lawpalyer logo

資料由法律人 LawPlayer整理提供·Singapore statutory provision · curated by LawPlayer

§ 173D — Self-incrimination and saving for advocates and solicitors

173D.—(1) A person is not excused from disclosing information to the Authority, or an investigator or authorised person mentioned in Subdivision (2) or (3), pursuant to a requirement made of the person under any provision of this Division, on the ground that the disclosure of the information might tend to incriminate the person.(2) Where a person claims, before making a statement disclosing information that the person is required to disclose under any provision of this Division to the Authority or to an investigator or authorised person mentioned in Subdivision (2) or (3), that the statement might tend to incriminate the person, that statement is not admissible in evidence against the person in criminal proceedings other than proceedings for an offence under section 173R(4).

(3) For the purposes of any proceedings for an offence under this Act, the making of a statement by an accused person made pursuant to a requirement mentioned in subsection (1), is not to be regarded under section 258(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 as caused by any inducement, threat or promise merely because the Authority, investigator or authorised person had earlier informed the accused person that the accused person was not excused from disclosing information on the ground that the disclosure of the information might tend to incriminate the accused person, if the Authority, investigator or authorised person (as the case may be) believed in good faith, when so informing the accused person, that —(a)

the accused person was concerned in an offence under this Act; or

(b)

a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists, that the accused person was concerned in an offence under this Act.

(4) Nothing in this Division —(a)

compels an advocate and solicitor or legal counsel to disclose or produce a privileged communication, or a book or other material containing a privileged communication, made by or to the advocate and solicitor or legal counsel in that capacity; or

(b)

authorises the taking of any such book or other material which is in the possession of an advocate and solicitor or legal counsel.

(5) Despite subsection (4), an advocate and solicitor or legal counsel —(a)

who is required under this Division to disclose or produce a privileged communication, or a book or other material containing a privileged communication, made by or to the advocate and solicitor or legal counsel in that capacity; and

(b)

who refuses to disclose or produce the privileged communication, book or other material,

must give the name and address (if he or she knows them) of the person to whom, or by or on behalf of whom, that privileged communication was made.

[Act 12 of 2024 wef 24/01/2025]

—(1) A person is not excused from disclosing information to the Authority, or an investigator or authorised person mentioned in Subdivision (2) or (3), pursuant to a requirement made of the person under any provision of this Division, on the ground that the disclosure of the information might tend to incriminate the person.

(2) Where a person claims, before making a statement disclosing information that the person is required to disclose under any provision of this Division to the Authority or to an investigator or authorised person mentioned in Subdivision (2) or (3), that the statement might tend to incriminate the person, that statement is not admissible in evidence against the person in criminal proceedings other than proceedings for an offence under section 173R(4).

(3) For the purposes of any proceedings for an offence under this Act, the making of a statement by an accused person made pursuant to a requirement mentioned in subsection (1), is not to be regarded under section 258(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 as caused by any inducement, threat or promise merely because the Authority, investigator or authorised person had earlier informed the accused person that the accused person was not excused from disclosing information on the ground that the disclosure of the information might tend to incriminate the accused person, if the Authority, investigator or authorised person (as the case may be) believed in good faith, when so informing the accused person, that —(a)

the accused person was concerned in an offence under this Act; or

(b)

a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists, that the accused person was concerned in an offence under this Act.

(4) Nothing in this Division —(a)

compels an advocate and solicitor or legal counsel to disclose or produce a privileged communication, or a book or other material containing a privileged communication, made by or to the advocate and solicitor or legal counsel in that capacity; or

(b)

authorises the taking of any such book or other material which is in the possession of an advocate and solicitor or legal counsel.

(5) Despite subsection (4), an advocate and solicitor or legal counsel —(a)

who is required under this Division to disclose or produce a privileged communication, or a book or other material containing a privileged communication, made by or to the advocate and solicitor or legal counsel in that capacity; and

(b)

who refuses to disclose or produce the privileged communication, book or other material,

must give the name and address (if he or she knows them) of the person to whom, or by or on behalf of whom, that privileged communication was made.

[Act 12 of 2024 wef 24/01/2025]

本頁資料來源:Singapore Statutes Online (AGC)·整理提供:法律人 LawPlayer· lawplayer.com