§ 42 — Reviewing Tribunal — grounds for cancellation

42.—(1) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel a Part 2 direction under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the requirements of section 6(1) were not satisfied;

(b)

the person that was given the direction was not a person to whom the direction may be given under section 7;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the direction.

(2) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel an access blocking order under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the online location specified in the access blocking order does not satisfy section 29(2);

(b)

the person that was given the order was not the provider of an internet access service;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the order.

(3) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel an app removal order under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the app specified in the app removal order does not satisfy section 30(2);

(b)

the person that was given the order was not the provider of an app distribution service;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the order.

(4) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel a service restriction order under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the person that was given the order was not the provider of a non-compliant online service;

(b)

the online service specified in the order was not a non‑compliant online service;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the order.

—(1) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel a Part 2 direction under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the requirements of section 6(1) were not satisfied;

(b)

the person that was given the direction was not a person to whom the direction may be given under section 7;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the direction.

(2) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel an access blocking order under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the online location specified in the access blocking order does not satisfy section 29(2);

(b)

the person that was given the order was not the provider of an internet access service;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the order.

(3) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel an app removal order under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the app specified in the app removal order does not satisfy section 30(2);

(b)

the person that was given the order was not the provider of an app distribution service;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the order.

(4) A Reviewing Tribunal may only cancel a service restriction order under section 41(3) on any of the following grounds:(a)

the person that was given the order was not the provider of a non-compliant online service;

(b)

the online service specified in the order was not a non‑compliant online service;

(c)

it is not reasonably practicable to comply with the order.