s 39 Parol evidence rule abolished
39.—(1) Despite sections 93 and 94 of the Evidence Act 1893, parol or extrinsic evidence establishing the existence of an express warranty is admissible in any action relating to a consumer transaction between a consumer and a supplier even though it adds to, varies or contradicts a written contract.
(2) Subsection (1) is not applicable to establish the existence of any express warranty in respect of goods or services intended for business use.[17
Read this section in the full act → · Open PART 4 →
Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Read the official text ↗
Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.
The Singapore legislation on this platform is subject to copyright of the Singapore Government and is used/reproduced for the purposes of this platform with the permission of the Attorney-General's Chambers. Users of this platform may check Singapore Statutes Online for the latest version of the Singapore legislation.
