The concentration by which Kesko Oy acquired sole control of Tuko Oy by purchase of shares is declared incompatible with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement.
資料由法律人 LawPlayer整理提供·EU law / curated by LawPlayer from EUR-Lex
97/277/EC: Commission Decision of 20 November 1996 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.784 - Kesko/Tuko) Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)
This Decision is addressed to:
Kesko Oy
Satamakatu 3
FIN-00160 Helsinki.
Done at Brussels, 20 November 1996.
For the Commission
Karel VAN MIERT
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ No L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 1; corrected version OJ No L 257, 21. 9. 1990, p. 13.
(2) OJ No C 130, 26. 4. 1997.
(3) See judgment of the Court of Justice of the EC in Case 56/65, Société Technique Minière v. Maschinenbau Ulm, [1966] ECR, p. 235.
(4) For example Case No IV/M.242 - Promodes/BRMC.
(5) According to the Rimi Store chain agreement, the Board can also fix prices for the basic selection.
(6) In the published version of this Decision, some information has been omitted or replaced by ranges, pursuant to Article 17 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets.
(7) According to statistics provided by AIM (1995).
(8) According to Kesko, the national market share of the Tarmo stores is [. . .] %.
(9) Annex witheld from public version for confidentiality reasons.
(10) 'Päivittäistavarakaupan kansainvälinen tehokkuusvertailu`, Helsinki 25 October 1991.
Cite this act
97/277/EC: Commission Decision of 20 November 1996 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.784 - Kesko/Tuko) Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (EUR-Lex). Retrieved via LawPlayer, https://lawplayer.com/eu/act/31997D0277
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU, provided the source is acknowledged.
本頁資料來源:EUR-Lex·整理提供:法律人 LawPlayer· lawplayer.com