My bookmarksSign up free

2003/722/EC: Commission Decision of 6 October 2003 on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as liquid-applied bridge deck waterproofing kits (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 3483)

2003/722/EC: Commission Decision of 6 October 2003 on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as liquid-applied bridge deck waterproofing kits (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 3483)

Directive 89/106/EEC Β· Decision Β· 4 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 Β· Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Β· Read the official text β†—

Article 1

The products and families of products set out in Annex I shall have their conformity attested by a procedure whereby, in addition to a factory production control system operated by the manufacturer, an approved certification body is involved in assessment and surveillance of the production control.

Article 2

The procedure for attesting conformity as set out in Annex II shall be indicated in the mandates for guidelines for European technical approvals.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 6 October 2003. For the Commission Erkki Liikanen Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12. (2) OJ L 220, 30.8.1993, p. 1.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEX ISupplementary provisions

Liquid-applied bridge deck waterproofing kits - For use exclusively in bridge decks ANNEX II Liquid-applied bridge deck waterproofing kits Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, EOTA is requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant guideline for European technical approvals: >TABLE> System 2+: See Directive 89/106/EEC, Annex III(2)(ii), first possibility including certification of factory production control by an approved body on the basis of initial inspection of factory and of factory production control as well as of continuous surveillance, assessment and approval of the factory production control. The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirement at all for such characteristic (see Article 2.1 of the CPD and, where applicable, clause 1.2.3 of the interpretative document). In those cases the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he or she does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), Β© European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next