My bookmarksSign up free

2010/205/: Commission Decision of 31 March 2010 concerning the reporting questionnaire relating to Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (notified under document C(2010) 1955) (Text with EEA relevance)

2010/205/: Commission Decision of 31 March 2010 concerning the reporting questionnaire relating to Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (notified under document C(2010) 1955) (Text with EEA relevance)

Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 · Decision · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

The Member States shall use the reporting questionnaire set up in Annex to this Decision as a basis for drawing up the report to be submitted to the Commission pursuant to Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX REPORTING QUESTIONNAIRE Additional information to be reported by Member States according to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC General notes: This questionnaire contains questions Member States are required to answer regarding the implementation of the E-PRTR Regulation during the last three reporting years . The responses to the questionnaire shall be made available by Member States in an electronic format . 1.   GENERAL DESCRIPTION Provide brief information on the process by which this report has been prepared, including information on the type of public authorities that have contributed . 2.   LEGAL MEASURES ESTABLISHING THE PRTR SYSTEM (ARTICLES 5, 20) List legislative, regulatory and other measures establishing the integrated pollutant release and transfer register . In particular, describe the measures adopted by Member States according to the provisions of Article 20 to ensure that the rules on penalties are effective, proportionate and dissuasive and what was the experience of their application. 3.   REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, IDENTIFICATION OF FACILITIES, COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND DATA TO BE REPORTED (ARTICLE 5) List legislative, regulatory and other measures which establish the reporting requirements for PRTR . In particular, describe the competent authorities designed to identify E-PRTR facilities and collect information on releases of pollutant from point sources. Please describe the reporting requirements and indicate the pathway of PRTR data collection in your country, listing the type of institutions involved and which part of the validation operations they are responsible for using the table below:   Institution Pathway Validation by this institution   Facility: …   Local Authorities: …   Regional authority: …   National authority: …   Ministry of the Environment: … 4.   PRTR REPORTING PRACTICE (ARTICLE 5) For each reporting cycle since the last reporting questionnaire, please indicate: (a) Deadlines for reporting to the competent authority; (b) Difficulties in meeting reporting deadlines, whether the various deadlines for reporting by facilities and for having the information publicly accessible on the register were met in practice; and if they were delayed, the reasons for this; (c) Proportion of electronic reporting compared to data delivered by operators on paper and description of reporting and tools available for both operators and competent authorities; (d) Main difficulties for operators and for competent authorities regarding reporting of PRTR data (please answer from the point of view of the authorities). 5.   DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ASSESSMENT (ARTICLE 9(1), (2) AND (3)) Describe the rules, procedures and measures ensuring the quality of the data reported under E-PRTR and what these revealed about the quality of the reported data . In particular, provide information on: (a) Assessment of the competent authorities on completeness, consistency and credibility of data provided by the operators; (b) Methodologies and procedures adopted by competent authorities, which resulted in submission of higher quality data. 6.   PUBLIC ACCESS TO PRTR DATA (ARTICLE 10(2)) Describe the way(s) in which public access to the information contained in the register is facilitated . In particular, provide information on: Where the information contained in the European PRTR register is not easily accessible to the public by direct electronic means, which measure has been taken to facilitate access to the register in publicly accessible locations. 7.   CONFIDENTIALITY (ARTICLE 7(2), 11) Where any information is kept confidential, give an indication of the types of information, the reason for and the frequency with which it has been withheld. In particular briefly outline: (a) Which type of data have been kept confidential; (b) The main reasons given for confidentiality claim; (c) The number of facilities per Annex-I-Activity with confidential data and the total number of reporting facility per Annex I-Activity. Please provide comments on practical experience and challenges encountered with respect to dealing with confidentiality claims in accordance with Article 4 of the Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, in particular with respect to information on releases and transfers as defined by Annex III.

Other acts of the same type
Council Decision (EU) 2015/372 of 8 October 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, and provisional application of a Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the government of the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of CroatiaCommission Decision (EU) 2015/658 of 8 October 2014 on the aid measure SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for support to the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (notified under document C(2014) 7142) (Text with EEA relevance)Council Decision (EU) 2019/703 of 8 October 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of CroatiaCouncil Decision (EU) 2023/1685 of 8 October 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, and provisional application of the Accession Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European UnionCommission Decision (EU) 2015/508 of 1 October 2014 on the alleged infrastructure aid implemented by Germany in favour of Propapier PM2 GmbH — State aid SA.36147 (C 30/10) (ex NN 45/10; ex CP 327/08) (notified under document C(2014) 6847) Text with EEA relevanceCommission Decision (EU) 2015/1071 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA 26190 (2012/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by Germany for Saarbrücken Airport and airlines using the airport (notified under document C(2014) 5062) (Only the English text is authentic)Text with EEA relevanceCommission Decision (EU) 2015/1072 of 1 October 2014 on the measures implemented by Germany in favour of Propapier PM2 GmbH — State aid SA.23827 (2013/C) (ex NN 46/12, ex N 582/07) (notified under document C(2014) 6837) (Only the German text is authentic)Text with EEA relevanceCommission Decision (EU) 2015/1344 of 1 October 2014 on State aid case SA.18857 (2012/C, ex 2011/NN) — Alleged aid to Västerås Airport and Ryanair Ltd (notified under document C(2014) 6832) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1584 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA.23098 (C 37/07) (ex NN 36/07) implemented by Italy in favour of Società di Gestione dell'Aeroporto di Alghero So.Ge.A.AL S.p.A. and various air carriers operating at Alghero airport (notified under document C(2014) 6838) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Decision (EU) 2016/151 of 1 October 2014 on the State aid SA.31550 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for Nürburgring (notified under document C(2014) 3634) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Decision (EU) 2016/152 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA 27339 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany for Zweibrücken airport and airlines using the airport (notified under document C(2014) 5063) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Decision (EU) 2016/286 of 1 October 2014 on State aid No SA.20867 (12/C) (ex 12/NN) implemented by Italy in favour of Carbosulcis S.p.A. (notified under document number C(2014) 6836) (Text with EEA relevance)

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next