2010/205/: Commission Decision of 31 March 2010 concerning the reporting questionnaire relating to Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (notified under document C(2010) 1955) (Text with EEA relevance)

Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 · Decision · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

The Member States shall use the reporting questionnaire set up in Annex to this Decision as a basis for drawing up the report to be submitted to the Commission pursuant to Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX REPORTING QUESTIONNAIRE Additional information to be reported by Member States according to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC General notes: This questionnaire contains questions Member States are required to answer regarding the implementation of the E-PRTR Regulation during the last three reporting years . The responses to the questionnaire shall be made available by Member States in an electronic format . 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Provide brief information on the process by which this report has been prepared, including information on the type of public authorities that have contributed . 2. LEGAL MEASURES ESTABLISHING THE PRTR SYSTEM (ARTICLES 5, 20) List legislative, regulatory and other measures establishing the integrated pollutant release and transfer register . In particular, describe the measures adopted by Member States according to the provisions of Article 20 to ensure that the rules on penalties are effective, proportionate and dissuasive and what was the experience of their application. 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, IDENTIFICATION OF FACILITIES, COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND DATA TO BE REPORTED (ARTICLE 5) List legislative, regulatory and other measures which establish the reporting requirements for PRTR . In particular, describe the competent authorities designed to identify E-PRTR facilities and collect information on releases of pollutant from point sources. Please describe the reporting requirements and indicate the pathway of PRTR data collection in your country, listing the type of institutions involved and which part of the validation operations they are responsible for using the table below: Institution Pathway Validation by this institution Facility: … Local Authorities: … Regional authority: … National authority: … Ministry of the Environment: … 4. PRTR REPORTING PRACTICE (ARTICLE 5) For each reporting cycle since the last reporting questionnaire, please indicate: (a) Deadlines for reporting to the competent authority; (b) Difficulties in meeting reporting deadlines, whether the various deadlines for reporting by facilities and for having the information publicly accessible on the register were met in practice; and if they were delayed, the reasons for this; (c) Proportion of electronic reporting compared to data delivered by operators on paper and description of reporting and tools available for both operators and competent authorities; (d) Main difficulties for operators and for competent authorities regarding reporting of PRTR data (please answer from the point of view of the authorities). 5. DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ASSESSMENT (ARTICLE 9(1), (2) AND (3)) Describe the rules, procedures and measures ensuring the quality of the data reported under E-PRTR and what these revealed about the quality of the reported data . In particular, provide information on: (a) Assessment of the competent authorities on completeness, consistency and credibility of data provided by the operators; (b) Methodologies and procedures adopted by competent authorities, which resulted in submission of higher quality data. 6. PUBLIC ACCESS TO PRTR DATA (ARTICLE 10(2)) Describe the way(s) in which public access to the information contained in the register is facilitated . In particular, provide information on: Where the information contained in the European PRTR register is not easily accessible to the public by direct electronic means, which measure has been taken to facilitate access to the register in publicly accessible locations. 7. CONFIDENTIALITY (ARTICLE 7(2), 11) Where any information is kept confidential, give an indication of the types of information, the reason for and the frequency with which it has been withheld. In particular briefly outline: (a) Which type of data have been kept confidential; (b) The main reasons given for confidentiality claim; (c) The number of facilities per Annex-I-Activity with confidential data and the total number of reporting facility per Annex I-Activity. Please provide comments on practical experience and challenges encountered with respect to dealing with confidentiality claims in accordance with Article 4 of the Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, in particular with respect to information on releases and transfers as defined by Annex III.

Other acts of the same type

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/248 of 15 October 2014 on the measures SA.23008 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Slovak Republic for Spoločná zdravotná poisťovňa, a. s. (SZP) and Všeobecná zdravotná poisťovňa, a. s. (VZP) (notified under document C(2014) 7277) Text with EEA relevance Commission Decision (EU) 2015/314 of 15 October 2014 on the State aid SA.35550 (13/C) (ex 13/NN) (ex 12/CP) implemented by Spain Scheme for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions (notified under document C(2014) 7280) Text with EEA relevance Commission Decision (EU) 2015/635 of 15 October 2014 on State aid SA.20580 (C 31/07) (ex NN 17/07) implemented by Ireland for Córas Iompair Éireann Bus Companies (Dublin Bus and Irish Bus) (notified under document number C(2014) 7275) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1826 of 15 October 2014 on the State aid SA.33797 — (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Slovakia for NCHZ (notified under document C(2014) 7359) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Decision (EU) 2016/287 of 15 October 2014 on State aid SA.26500 — 2012/C (ex 2011/NN, ex CP 227/2008) implemented by Germany for Flugplatz Altenburg-Nobitz GmbH and Ryanair Ltd (notified under document C(2014) 7369) (Text with EEA relevance)2014/713/EU: Commission Decision of 13 October 2014 on the establishment of the annual priority lists for the development of network codes and guidelines for 2015 Text with EEA relevance 2014/714/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 13 October 2014 to withdraw from the Official Journal of the European Union the reference of harmonised standard EN 1384:2012 ‘Helmets for equestrian activities’ under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2014) 7236)2014/720/EU: Council Decision of 13 October 2014 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee on Government Procurement on the accession of Montenegro to the Revised Agreement on Government Procurement 2014/721/EU: Council Decision of 13 October 2014 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee on Government Procurement on the accession of New Zealand to the Revised Agreement on Government Procurement Council Decision (EU) 2015/1277 of 13 October 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, and provisional application of the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union 2014/734/EU: Council Decision of 9 October 2014 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Stabilisation and Association Council established by the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, as regards the replacement of Protocol 4 to that Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, by a new protocol which, as regards the rules of origin, refers to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin 2014/735/EU: Council Decision of 9 October 2014 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Stabilisation and Association Council established by the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part, as regards the replacement of Protocol 3 to that Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, by a new protocol which, as regards the rules of origin, refers to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next

Browse all EU Legal ActsEvery instrument by type and year, full text free to read section by sectionEuropean Union legislation EU Legal Acts by type and yearGrouped by instrument type and year of enactment, so you can find others of the same kindBrowse by type and year European Union: what this database coversWhich datasets are here, which official source they come from, and how current they areEuropean Union overview