Article 1
Annex III to Decision 1999/93/EC is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
2011/246/EU: Commission Decision of 18 April 2011 amending Decision 1999/93/EC on the procedure for attesting the conformity of construction products pursuant to Article 20(2) of Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards doors, windows, shutters, blinds, gates and related building hardware (notified under document C(2011) 2587) Text with EEA relevance
Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗
Annex III to Decision 1999/93/EC is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEX ‘ANNEX III PRODUCT FAMILY DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, BLINDS, GATES AND RELATED BUILDING HARDWARE (1/1) 1. Systems of attestation of conformity For the product(s) and intended use(s) listed below, CEN/Cenelec are requested to specify the following system(s) of attestation of conformity in the relevant harmonised standard(s): Product(s) Intended use(s) Level(s) or class(es) Attestation of conformity system(s) Doors and gates (with or without related hardware) fire/smoke compartmentation and on escape routes — 1 other declared specific uses and/or uses subject to other specific requirements, in particular noise, energy, tightness and safety-in-use (i.e. NOT for fire/smoke compartmentation, NOT for escape routes) — 3 for internal communication only — 4 Windows (with or without related hardware) fire/smoke compartmentation and on escape routes — 1 any other — 3 Building hardware related to doors, gates and windows fire/smoke compartmentation and on escape routes — 1 any other — 3 Shutters and blinds (with or without related hardware) external use — 4 System 1: See point (i) of Section 2 of Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC, without audit-testing of samples. System 3: See point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC, second possibility. System 4: See point (ii) of Section 2 of Annex III to Directive 89/106/EEC, third possibility. The specification for the system should be such that it can be implemented even where the performance does not need to be determined for a certain characteristic, because at least one Member State has no legal requirements at all for such characteristic (see Article 2(1) of Directive 89/106/EEC and, where applicable, point 1.2.3 of the Interpretative Documents). In those cases, the verification of such a characteristic must not be imposed on the manufacturer if he does not wish to declare the performance of the product in that respect.’
Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.