My bookmarksSign up free

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1153/2014 of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 as regards the data to be collected, and the sampling, precision and quality requirements (Text with EEA relevance)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1153/2014 of 29 October 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 as regards the data to be collected, and the sampling, precision and quality requirements (Text with EEA relevance)

Regulation (EU) No 1153/2014 · Regulation · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

Annexes I, II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 are replaced by the texts set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX 1.    Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX I Variables Note to the table: The values “core” and “key” in the column “variable group” are explained in Annex III. The value “ID” means that the variable is an “identification variable” (no missing allowed). In the column “variable type” the value “QL” refers to “qualitative variable” of type yes/no, “QM” to “qualitative variable” with multiple categories as described in the table and “QT” refers to “quantitative variable”. CVT stands for continuing vocational training. IVT stands for initial vocational training. NACE refers to the classification of economic activity according to NACE Rev. 2. 1.    Variables to be collected from all enterprises: sample characteristics Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description COUNTRY ID   Country code ENTERPR ID   Enterprise ID REFYEAR ID   Reference year WEIGHT ID   Weighting factor. Two decimal positions — use “.” as decimal separator NACE_SP ID   Sampling plan economic activity category SIZE_SP ID   Sampling plan size group NSTRA_SP ID   Sampling plan — number of enterprises in the stratum defined by NACE_SP and SIZE_SP, i.e. the population N_SP ID   Sampling plan — number of sampled enterprises from the sample-frame in the stratum defined by NACE_SP and SIZE_SP SUB_SP ID   Sub-sample indicator, shows if enterprise belongs to sub-sample N_RESPST ID   Number of responding enterprises in the stratum defined by NACE_SP and SIZE_SP N_EMPREG ID   Number of persons employed according to the register RESPONSE ID   Response indicator (sampling unit type) PROC ID   Data collection mode IDLANGUA ID   Language of data collection IDREGION ID   Region identification NUTS — level 1 EXTRA1 ID   Extra variable 1 (see Annex III) EXTRA2 ID   Extra variable 2 (see Annex III) EXTRA3 ID   Extra variable 3 (see Annex III) 2.    Variables to be collected from all enterprises: background data Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description A1 Core QM Actual NACE CODE A2tot Core QT Total number of persons employed on 31 December of the reference year A2m   QT Total number of males employed on 31 December of the reference year A2f   QT Total number of females employed on 31 December of the reference year A4 Key QT Total number of hours worked in the reference year by persons employed A5 Key QT Total labour costs (direct + indirect) of all persons employed in the reference year 3.    Variables to be collected from all enterprises: CVT strategies Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description A8   QL Person or unit within the enterprise with responsibility for the organisation of CVT A9   QM Assessment of future skill needs of the enterprise       Yes but not regularly (mainly linked to changes in personnel)       Yes, it is part of the overall planning process in the enterprise       No A10   QM Reaction to future needs through       Continuing vocational training of current staff       Recruitment of new staff with the suitable qualifications, skills and competences       Recruitment of new staff combined with specific training       Internal reorganisation to better use existing skills and competences A12   QM Skills and competences important in the next few years (3 most important)       General IT skills       IT professional skills       Management skills       Team working skills       Customer handling skills       Problem solving skills       Office administration skills       Foreign language skills       Technical, practical or job-specific skills       Oral or written communication skills       Numeracy and/or literacy skills       None of these       Do not know A13   QL Planning of CVT in the enterprise leads to a written training plan or programme A14   QL Annual training budget, which includes provision for CVT A15   QL National, sector or other agreements between the social partners, which cover the provision of CVT A16a   QL Staff representatives/committees involved in the management process of CVT A16b   QM Aspects covered by staff representatives/committees       Objective setting of training       Establishing criteria for the selection of participants or specific target groups       Form/type of training (e.g. internal/external courses; other forms such as guided-on-the-job training)       Content of training       Budget for training       Selection of external training providers       Evaluation/assessment of training outcomes 4.    Variables to be collected from all enterprises: CVT characteristics Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description B1a Core QL Provision of internal CVT courses in the reference year B1b Core QL Provision of external CVT courses in the reference year B2a Core QL Provision of guided-on-the-job training in the reference year     QM Participation in guided-on-the-job training       Less than 10 % of all persons employed       From 10 % to less than 50 % of all persons employed       50 % or more of all persons employed B2b Core QL Provision of job rotation, exchanges, secondments or study visits in the reference year     QM Participation in job rotation, exchanges, secondments or study visits       Less than 10 % of all persons employed       From 10 % to less than 50 % of all persons employed       50 % or more of all persons employed B2c Core QL Participation in conferences/workshops in the reference year     QM Participation in conferences/workshops       Less than 10 % of all persons employed       From 10 % to less than 50 % of all persons employed       50 % or more of all persons employed B2d Core QL Participation in learning or quality circles in the reference year     QM Participation in learning or quality circles       Less than 10 % of all persons employed       From 10 % to less than 50 % of all persons employed       50 % or more of all persons employed B2e Core QL Planned training by self-directed learning/e-learning in the reference year     QM Participation in self-directed learning/e-learning       Less than 10 % of all persons employed       From 10 % to less than 50 % of all persons employed       50 % or more of all persons employed B3   QL Provision of CVT courses in the year before the reference year B4   QL Provision of other forms of CVT in the year before the reference year B5a   QL Existence of CVT contributions in the reference year     QT Amount of CVT contributions (in euros) B5b   QL Existence of CVT receipts in the reference year     QT Amount of CVT receipts (in euros) B6   QM Measures from which the enterprise benefits       Tax incentives (tax allowances, tax exemptions, tax credits, tax relief, tax deferrals)       Receipts from training funds (national, regional, sector)       EU subsidies (e.g. European Social Fund)       Government subsidies       Other sources       None of these Sections 5 and 6 shall be addressed to enterprises providing CVT courses in the reference year [(B1a or B1b) = yes]. Section 7 shall be addressed to all training enterprises in the reference year, i.e.: — enterprises providing CVT courses in 2015 [(B1a or B1b) = yes], or — enterprises providing other forms of CVT in 2015 [(B2a or B2b or B2c or B2d or B2e) = yes]. Section 8 shall be addressed to non-training enterprises only. 5.    Variables to be collected from enterprises which provided CVT courses: CVT participants, subjects and providers Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description C1tot Key QT Total number of participants in all CVT courses C2m   QT Number of CVT course participants — males C2f   QT Number of CVT course participants — females C3tot Key QT Paid working time (in hours) spent on all CVT courses C3i   QT Paid working time (in hours) for internal CVT courses C3e   QT Paid working time (in hours) for external CVT courses C4   QT Share of training hours spent on obligatory courses for health and safety at work C5   QM Subjects covered (3 most important)       General IT skills       IT professional skills       Management skills       Team working skills,       Customer handling skills       Problem solving skills       Office administration skills       Foreign language skills       Technical, practical or job-specific skills       Oral or written communication skills       Numeracy and/or literacy skills       None of these C6   QM Providers (external CVT courses) (3 most important)       Schools, colleges, universities and other higher education institutions       Public training institutions (financed or guided by the government; e.g. adult education centres)       Private training companies       Private companies of which the main activity is not training       Employers' associations, chambers of commerce, sector bodies       Trade unions       Other training providers 6.    Variables to be collected from enterprises which provided CVT courses: CVT costs Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description C7a   QL Existence of fees or payments for courses     QT CVT course costs — fees and payments for courses for employees (in euros) C7b   QL Existence of travel or subsistence payments     QT CVT course costs — travel and subsistence payments (in euros) C7c   QL Existence of labour costs of internal trainers     QT CVT course costs — labour costs of internal trainers (in euros) C7d   QL Existence of costs of training centre, rooms or teaching materials     QT CVT course costs — training centre, rooms and teaching materials for CVT courses (in euros) C7sub   QL Existence of “CVT costs sub-total” only (no sub-categories)   Key QT CVT costs sub-total (in euros) PAC Key QT Personal absence cost — to be calculated (PAC = C3tot × A5/A4 in euros) C7tot Key QT Total CVT costs — to be calculated (C7tot = C7sub + B5a – B5b in euros) 7.    Variables to be collected from enterprises which provided CVT courses or other forms of CVT: CVT quality, outcomes and difficulties Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description D2a   QM Assessment of the outcomes of CVT activities       Yes, for all activities       Yes, for some activities       No, proof of participation is sufficient D2b   QM Methods of assessment       Certification after written or practical test       Satisfaction survey amongst participants       Assessment of participants' behaviour or performance in relation to training objectives       Assessment/measurement of the impact of training on performance of relevant departments or the whole enterprise       Other D3   QM Factors limiting CVT provision in the reference year       No limiting factors: level of training provided was appropriate to the needs of the enterprise       Recruitment of individuals with the required qualifications, skills and competences       Difficulties in assessing training needs in the enterprise       Lack of suitable offers of CVT courses in the market       High costs of CVT courses       Higher focus on IVT provision than on CVT       Major efforts in CVT realised in recent years       Limited time available for staff to participate in CVT       Other reasons 8.    Variables to be collected from non-training enterprises: reasons for non-provision of CVT activities Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description E1   QM Reasons for not providing CVT in the reference year       The existing qualifications, skills and competences were appropriate to the current needs of the enterprise       Recruitment of individuals with the required qualifications, skills and competences was preferred       Difficulties in assessing training needs in the enterprise       Lack of suitable offers of CVT courses in the market       High costs of CVT courses       Higher focus on IVT provision than on CVT       Major efforts in CVT realised in recent years       No time available for staff to participate in CVT       Other reasons 9.    Variables to be collected from all enterprises: initial vocational training (IVT) Variable name Variable group Variable type Variable description F1 Core QL IVT participants usually employed in the enterprise F2   QM Reasons for providing IVT (if F1 = yes)       To qualify future employees according to the needs of the enterprise       To choose the best apprentices for future employment after completion of initial vocational training       To avoid possible mismatch with enterprise needs in case of external recruitment       To make use of the productive capacities of IVT participants already during their initial vocational training       Other reasons’ 2.    Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX II Sample 1.    Business registers referred to in Regulation (EC) No 177/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council  ( 1 ) shall be taken as the main source of the sampling frame. A nationally representative stratified probability sample of enterprises shall be taken from this frame. 2.    The sample shall be stratified by NACE Rev. 2 and size category according to the following minimum specifications: — 20 NACE Rev. 2 categories [B, C10-C12, C13-C15, C17-C18, C19-C23, C24-C25, C26-C28+C33, C29-C30, C16+C31-C32, D-E, F, G45, G46, G47, H, I, J, K64-K65, K66, L+M+N+R+S], — 3 enterprise size categories, according to their number of persons employed: (10-49) (50-249) (250 and more) for countries with fewer than 50 million inhabitants, — 6 enterprise size categories, according to their number of persons employed: (10-19) (20-49) (50-249) (250-499) (500-999) (1 000 and more) for Member States with 50 million inhabitants or more. 3.    A sample size shall be calculated to ensure a maximum half-length of 0,2 of the 95 % confidence interval for the estimated parameters, which are a proportion of “training enterprises” (after allowance for the non-response rate in the sample) for each of the 60 stratified elements identified above (120 stratified elements for Member States with 50 million inhabitants or more). 4.    The following formula may be used in determining the sample size: Where: r h = the anticipated response rate in the stratum cell, h c = maximum length of half the confidence interval te h = the anticipated proportion of training enterprises in the stratum cell, h N h = the total number of enterprises (training and non-training) in the stratum cell, h’ 3.    Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX III Imputation principles and record weighting Member States shall take all appropriate measures to reduce item and unit non-response. Prior to imputation countries shall make all reasonable efforts to use other data sources. Core variables, for which neither missing values shall be accepted nor imputation permitted, are: — A1, A2tot, B1a, B1b, B2a(QL), B2b(QL) B2c(QL), B2d(QL) B2e(QL), F1. Key variables, for which every effort should be made to avoid missing values and for which imputation is recommended, are: — A4, A5, C1tot, C3tot, C7sub(QT), PAC, C7tot. Imputation for item non-response shall be recommended within the following general limits: 1. When a record contains less than 50 % of variables presented then this record shall normally be considered as a unit non-response. 2. For a single NACE Rev. 2/size cell imputations shall not be allowed if more than 50 % of the responding enterprises have missing data for more than 25 % of the quantitative variables. 3. For a single NACE Rev. 2/size cell, no imputation shall be performed on a quantitative variable if the proportion of responding enterprises for that particular variable is less than 50 %. 4. For a single NACE Rev. 2/size cell, no imputation shall be performed on a qualitative variable if the proportion of responding enterprises for that particular variable is less than 80 %. Quantitative and qualitative variables are identified in Annex I. Rules for imputation are provided in the manual referred to in Article 8. Member States shall calculate and transmit a weighting factor — to be applied to each data record — together with the auxiliary variables, which may have been used in the calculation of this weighting factor. These auxiliary variables should be recorded as the variables EXTRA1, EXTRA2, EXTRA3 as necessary. The methodology adopted for establishing the weighting factors shall be detailed in the quality report.’ 4.    Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following: ‘ANNEX V Standard quality report Member States shall submit a standard quality report in accordance with the European Statistical System Standard Quality Report Structure. A copy of the national questionnaire shall be submitted together with the standard quality report. The standard quality criteria shall apply as follows: 1.   RELEVANCE Implementation of the survey and the degree to which statistics meet current and potential user needs. This covers a description of users and their individual needs and an evaluation to what degree these needs have been satisfied. 2.   ACCURACY 2.1.    Sampling errors This covers: — Description of the sample design and of the effective sample. — Description of the calculation of the final weighting factors including non-response model and auxiliary variables used, estimator used, e.g. Horvitz-Thompson estimator, variance of the estimates according to the sample strata, variance estimation software. In particular, a description of the auxiliary variables or information used should be reported in order to recalculate the final weighting factors at Eurostat since it is needed for variance estimation. — In case of non-response analysis, a description of the biases in the sample and results. Tables to be provided (broken down by NACE Rev. 2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan): — Number of enterprises in the sampling frame. — Number of enterprises in the gross sample and in the effective sample. Tables to be provided for the observed effective sample (broken down by NACE Rev. 2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan): — Coefficients of variation  ( 2 ) for the following key statistics. — Total number of persons employed, total number of enterprises that provided any form of CVT, ratio of the total number of enterprises that provided any form of CVT to the total number of enterprises. — Total number of enterprises that provided CVT courses, ratio of the total number of enterprises that provided CVT courses to the total number of enterprises. — Total number of persons employed in enterprises that provided any form of CVT, total number of participants in CVT courses, ratio of the total number of participants in CVT courses to the total number of persons employed, ratio of the total number of participants in CVT courses to the total number of persons employed in enterprises that provided CVT. — Total costs of CVT courses. — Total number of enterprises providing IVT, ratio of the total number of enterprises providing IVT to the total number of enterprises. 2.2.    Non-sampling errors 2.2.1.    Coverage errors This covers: — Description of the register used for sampling and its overall quality, information included in the register, and its updating frequency. — Errors due to the discrepancies between the sampling frame and the target population and sub-populations (over-coverage, under-coverage, misclassifications). — Methods used to obtain this information and notes on the processing of misclassifications. Tables to be provided for the observed effective sample (broken down by NACE Rev. 2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan): — Number of enterprises. — Ratio of the number of enterprises for which the observed strata equals the sampling strata. 2.2.2.    Measurement errors Where appropriate an assessment of errors that occurred at the stage of data collection due to: — The questionnaire design (results of pre-tests or laboratory methods; questioning strategies). — Reporting unit/respondent considering the data collection mode used (e.g. problems and strategies to find the appropriate respondent(s) in the enterprise, memory problems, errors when filling the forms, assistance to the respondent). This includes a description and assessment of measures taken to ensure the high quality of the information related to “participants” and to assure that “participant events” were not collected. — Existence/use of relevant information systems and administrative records in the enterprise, e.g. correspondence between the administrative and survey concept (reference period, availability of individual data). — Methods used to reduce this kind of errors, problems with the questionnaire as a whole or with single questions. 2.2.3.    Processing errors This covers a description of the data editing process such as processing system and tools used, errors due to coding, editing, weighting or tabulation, quality checks at macro/micro level and corrections/failed edits. 2.2.4.    Non-response errors This covers an assessment of unit non-response and item non-response and a description of the measures undertaken regarding “re-contacts” as well as: — Report on imputation procedures including methods used for imputation and/or re-weighting. — Methodological notes and results of non-response analysis or other methods to assess the effects of non-response. Tables to be provided for the observed effective sample (broken down by NACE Rev. 2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan): — Unit response rates  ( 3 ) . — Item response rates  ( 4 ) for the following with respect to all respondents: total number of hours worked for all respondents and total labour cost for all respondents. — Item response rates for the following with respect to enterprises offering CVT courses: — Total number of participants in CVT courses for enterprises offering CVT courses. — Total number of hours of all CVT courses for enterprises offering CVT courses, number of hours of internal CVT for enterprises offering CVT courses, number of hours of external CVT for enterprises offering CVT courses. — Total costs of CVT courses for enterprises offering CVT courses. 3.   TIMELINESS AND PUNCTUALITY This covers a table of dates when different phases of the project started and ended such as fieldwork (considering the different data collection modes), reminders and follow-up, data checking and editing, further validation and imputation, non-response survey (as appropriate) and estimations as well as data transmission to Eurostat and dissemination of national results. 4.   ACCESSIBILITY AND CLARITY This covers the type of results sent to enterprises, a dissemination scheme of results and a copy of any methodological documents about the statistics provided. 5.   COMPARABILITY This covers the deviations from the standard European questionnaire and definitions provided in the manual referred to in Article 8 and a description of links done with other statistical sources (use of certain data available in registers, survey linked to another national survey). 6.   COHERENCE This covers a comparison of statistics for the same phenomenon or item from other surveys or sources and an assessment of coherence with structural business statistics for the number of persons employed as a function of NACE Rev. 2 and size classes. Tables to be provided for the observed effective sample (broken down by NACE Rev. 2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan): — Number of persons employed from structural business statistics and number of persons employed from CVTS. — Percentage of differences (SBS — CVTS)/SBS. 7.   COST AND BURDEN This covers an analysis of the burden and benefit at national level through, for example, a consideration of average time for answering the questionnaire, problematic questions and variables, variables most/least useful in describing CVT at national level, estimated or actual satisfaction level of data users at national level, difference of burden between small and large enterprises and efforts made to reduce the burden.’ ( 1 )   Regulation (EC) No 177/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 establishing a common framework for business registers for statistical purposes ( OJ L 61, 5.3.2008, p. 6 ). ( 2 )   The coefficient of variation is the ratio of the square root of the variance of the estimator to the expected value. It is estimated by the ratio of the square root of the estimate of the sampling variance to the estimated value. The estimation of the sampling variance must take into account the sampling design and changes of strata. ( 3 )   The unit response rate is the ratio of the number of in scope respondents to the number of questionnaires sent to the population selected. ( 4 )   The item response rate for a variable is the ratio of the number of available data to the number of available and missing data (equal to the number of in scope respondents).

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next