The targets included in the performance plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, listed in the Annex, are inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.
資料由法律人 LawPlayer整理提供·EU law / curated by LawPlayer from EUR-Lex
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/347 of 2 March 2015 concerning the inconsistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (notified under document C(2015) 1263) Text with EEA relevance
The Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Austria, Slovenia and Slovakia as regards FABCE, Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands as regards FABEC, Greece, Italy, Cyprus and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, Bulgaria and Romania as regards Danube FAB, and Spain and Portugal as regards SW FAB, should take the necessary measures to ensure that their national supervisory authorities propose revised performance targets, in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.
The performance targets in the key performance area of capacity submitted by the Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Austria, Slovenia and Slovakia as regards FABCE, by Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands as regards FABEC, by Greece, Italy, Cyprus and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, by Bulgaria and Romania as regards Danube FAB and by Spain and Portugal as regards SW FAB should be revised downwards. As a minimum, those targets should be in accordance with the respective FAB reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan. Where the Network Operations Plan specifies remediation or mitigation measures, account should be taken of those measures when revising the performance targets.
The performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency expressed in en route determined unit costs submitted by Austria and Slovakia as regards FABCE, by Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands as regards FABEC and by Italy as regards Blue Med FAB should be revised downwards, to a level that is in line with the reduction of the average en route determined unit costs on Union level over the second reference period and, where that is not yet the case, over the combined period of the first and the second reference period. Those downwards revisions should include a reduction in en route determined costs over the second reference period and, for Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, a revision of the forecasted traffic expressed in service units.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic.
Schedules & Appendices
ANNEX
Performance targets in the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 found to be inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY
En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight
MEMBER STATE
FAB
FAB TARGET EN-ROUTE CAPACITY
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Czech Republic
FAB CE
0,32
0,31
0,31
0,30
Consistent (0,29)
Croatia
Hungary
Austria
Slovenia
Slovakia
Belgium/Luxembourg
FAB EC
0,48
0,49
0,48
0,47
Consistent (0,43)
Germany
France
Netherlands
[Switzerland]
Greece
Blue Med
0,35
0,36
0,37
0,37
0,38
Italy
Cyprus
Malta
Bulgaria
Danube
0,08
0,08
0,08
0,09
0,09
Romania
Spain
SW
0,52
0,52
0,52
0,52
0,52
Portugal
KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY
Legend
Key
Item
Units
(A)
Total En-route Determined Costs
(in nominal terms and in national currency)
(B)
Inflation rate
(%)
(C)
Inflation index
(100 = 2009)
(D)
Total En-route Determined Costs
(in real 2009 prices and in national currency)
(E)
Total En-route Services Units
(TSUs)
(F)
En-route Determined Unit Cost (DUC)
(in real 2009 prices and in national currency)
BLUE MED FAB
Charging Zone: Italy — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
696 150 348
712 171 934
731 453 130
750 864 934
765 870 274
(B)
1,0 %
1,1 %
1,3 %
1,5 %
1,6 %
(C)
111,3
112,5
114,0
115,7
117,5
(D)
625 518 979
632 952 539
641 746 263
649 041 739
651 586 847
(E)
9 014 000
9 447 000
9 824 000
10 209 000
10 630 000
(F)
69,39
67,00
65,32
63,58
61,30
FAB CE
Charging Zone: Austria — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
188 243 000
195 340 000
198 306 000
203 074 000
206 839 000
(B)
1,7 %
1,7 %
1,7 %
1,7 %
1,7 %
(C)
114,4
116,4
118,3
120,4
122,4
(D)
164 512 578
167 861 269
167 561 493
168 722 008
168 977 503
(E)
2 693 000
2 658 000
2 728 000
2 798 000
2 882 000
(F)
61,09
63,15
61,42
60,30
58,63
Charging Zone: Slovakia — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
61 695 383
66 471 778
69 789 826
73 508 613
74 662 243
(B)
1,6 %
1,8 %
2,0 %
2,1 %
2,2 %
(C)
112,9
115,0
117,3
119,7
122,3
(D)
54 631 715
57 814 800
59 507 010
61 395 324
61 041 573
(E)
1 114 110
1 168 000
1 219 000
1 268 000
1 330 604
(F)
49,04
49,50
48,82
48,42
45,88
FAB EC
Charging Zone: Belgium-Luxembourg — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
168 053 280
172 546 632
177 419 403
180 598 797
184 687 422
(B)
1,1 %
1,2 %
1,3 %
1,4 %
1,4 %
(C)
112,2
113,5
115,0
116,6
118,2
(D)
149 766 718
151 965 777
154 223 135
154 872 832
156 223 161
(E)
2 370 804
2 397 991
2 426 749
2 462 930
2 501 309
(F)
63,17
63,37
63,55
62,88
62,46
Charging Zone: France — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
1 290 640 175
1 296 576 851
1 328 676 965
1 340 098 296
1 343 820 915
(B)
1,2 %
1,3 %
1,4 %
1,5 %
1,6 %
(C)
109,8
111,3
112,9
114,6
116,4
(D)
1 174 993 349
1 165 249 826
1 177 263 728
1 169 490 307
1 154 043 494
(E)
18 487 000
18 604 000
18 714 000
18 876 000
19 064 000
(F)
63,56
62,63
62,91
61,96
60,54
Charging Zone: Germany — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
1 085 545 510
1 042 966 695
1 042 231 408
1 040 128 865
1 054 280 740
(B)
1,4 %
1,6 %
1,7 %
1,7 %
1,7 %
(C)
110,5
112,3
114,2
116,2
118,1
(D)
981 973 060
928 599 125
912 433 104
895 371 101
892 382 909
(E)
12 568 000
12 665 000
12 765 000
12 879 000
13 004 000
(F)
78,13
73,32
71,48
69,52
68,62
Charging Zone: Netherlands — Currency: EUR
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
(A)
186 172 831
185 355 981
189 152 594
195 873 996
200 293 234
(B)
1,0 %
1,2 %
1,4 %
1,5 %
1,5 %
(C)
111,2
112,5
114,2
115,9
117,6
(D)
167 474 497
164 697 439
165 685 043
169 053 642
170 296 296
(E)
2 806 192
2 825 835
2 845 616
2 874 072
2 902 813
(F)
59,68
58,28
58,22
58,82
58,67
Cite this act
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/347 of 2 March 2015 concerning the inconsistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (notified under document C(2015) 1263) Text with EEA relevance (EUR-Lex). Retrieved via LawPlayer, https://lawplayer.com/eu/act/32015D0347
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU, provided the source is acknowledged.
本頁資料來源:EUR-Lex·整理提供:法律人 LawPlayer· lawplayer.com