Source

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1115 of 7 July 2016 establishing a format for the submission by the European Chemicals Agency of information concerning the operation of the procedures pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals (notified under document C(2016) 4141)

Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1115 · Decision · 4 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

Open ↗

The format for submission by the European Chemicals Agency of the information required under Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 shall be a questionnaire as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

Open ↗

The first report to be submitted by the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 shall cover the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Article 3

Open ↗

This Decision is addressed to the European Chemicals Agency.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX QUESTIONNAIRE Section 1: General information 1. Organisation: 2. Period covered: Section 2: Information on the Agency 3. Human resources in the Agency (in full-time equivalent) working on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012: 4. Is the Agency staff also involved in the implementation of other EU/international chemical legislation/conventions/programme? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please specify which legislation and describe the issues/topics on which staff working on Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 collaborates with staff working on a different piece of legislation: 5. Is the Agency's workload in line with the predicted workload? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: Section 3: Support to exporters and importers 6. In which of the following activities has the Agency set support and communication activities in place in order to assist exporters and importers in complying with Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? ☐ Technical and scientific guidance ☐ Web pages on Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 and ePIC ☐ Internal messaging in ePIC ☐ Awareness-raising campaign ☐ Social media ☐ Visits to operator establishments ☐ Support to individual companies ☐ Workshops, webinars and similar training events ☐ IT user manuals, factsheets and Q&A (frequently asked questions) ☐ Others Additional information, if relevant: 7. Does the Agency consider that these support and communication activities have improved the compliance of exporters and importers with Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: 8. What is the nature of the most frequent requests for support coming from exporters and importers? ☐ Chemicals subject to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 and other scope-related issues ☐ Activation of reference identification numbers and related issues (e.g. export notification and explicit consent/waiver) ☐ Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on reporting ☐ ePIC functionality ☐ Others Additional information, including the number of requests received and an indication on the distribution of the questions across the topics. 9. Estimated amount of time spent on such support (expressed as a percentage of the total number of full-time equivalents): Section 4: Coordination between the Agency and the Commission/Designated National Authorities (DNAs) 10. Is the Agency satisfied with the collaboration with the Commission? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: 11. Areas in which collaboration could be improved, if any: ☐ Article 6(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on drafting of decision guidance documents and other technical documents related to the implementation of the Convention ☐ Preparation of notifications of final regulatory action to the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat ☐ Technical preparation of meetings (e.g. DNA meetings, Chemical Review Committee, Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention) ☐ Participation in meetings (e.g. DNA meetings, Chemical Review Committee, Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention) ☐ Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on providing technical and scientific input in order to ensure the effective implementation of the Regulation ☐ Providing technical and scientific input and assistance concerning the Commission's role as common DNA of the Union ☐ Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export in case of an emergency situation ☐ Article 14(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on decisions that the export can proceed in the absence of an explicit consent ☐ Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on exchange of information ☐ Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on technical assistance ☐ Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on updating annexes ☐ Other Additional information: 12. Is the Agency satisfied with the collaboration with the DNAs? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: 13. Areas in which collaboration could be improved, if any: ☐ Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on the timelines for processing export notifications ☐ Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export in case of an emergency situation ☐ Article 8(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on additional information to provide on request concerning the exported chemical ☐ Article 14(6) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on substances that cannot be exported unless certain conditions are fulfilled ☐ Article 14(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on decisions that the export can proceed in the absence of an explicit consent ☐ Other Additional information: Section 5: Export notifications forwarded to Parties to the Rotterdam Convention and other countries 14. How many export notifications and related tasks have been handled by the Agency per year (i.e. the year in which the export took place)? Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Export notifications handled Export notifications forwarded Acknowledgments of receipt received Export notifications forwarded a second time 15. What are the information requirements requested in the export notification form where exporters experience difficulties? ☐ Identity of the substance to be exported ☐ Identity of the mixture to be exported ☐ Identity of the article to be exported ☐ Information concerning the export ☐ Information on hazards and/or risks of the chemical and precautionary measures ☐ Summary of physico-chemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties ☐ Information on final regulatory action taken by the exporting country ☐ Additional information provided by the exporting Party ☐ Availability of CN codes or CUS codes ☐ Intended use of the chemical in the importing country ☐ Summary of and reasons for the final regulatory action and date of entry into force ☐ Others ☐ Not applicable Additional information: 16. What is the number of export notifications sent back to the exporter for the reasons mentioned in the table below? Reason/Number per year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Re-submission requested Rejected If relevant, please specify the most frequent reasons for requesting re-submission and for rejecting export notifications: Reasons for requesting re-submission of export notifications: Reasons for rejecting export notifications: 17. Has the Agency noticed that the DNAs have experienced difficulties in coping with the time frame to forward the notifications to the Agency? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, how many notifications were received late during the reporting period and which percentage of the total number of notifications did this represent: Year No of late notifications % of total yearly No of notifications Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Additional information: 18. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in coping with the time frame to process and forward the notifications to the importing (non-EU) country? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, how many notifications were processed late during the reporting period and which percentage of the total number of notifications did this represent: Year No of late notifications % of total yearly No of notifications Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export of a chemical relating to an emergency situation 19. Has the Agency experienced difficulties when processing an export notification submitted under the emergency situation procedure? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ No such export notification has been received Additional information: Article 8(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on available additional information concerning exported chemicals 20. Was the Agency requested to provide additional information concerning exported chemicals to importing parties and other countries? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, which type of information was requested: Section 6: Export notifications from Parties and other countries Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export notifications received by the Agency from the authorities in non-EU countries 21. How many export notifications did the Agency receive from non-EU countries in the reporting period? Notifications received Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 22. How many acknowledgements of receipt for export notifications from non-EU countries did the Agency send in the reporting period? Acknowledgements sent Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Section 7: Information on export and import of chemicals Reporting of Designated National Authorities to the Agency (Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012) 23. Did the Agency experience delays from Designated National Authorities in receiving the aggregated national reports on the quantity of the chemicals (as a substance and as contained in mixtures or in articles) exported to/imported from each Party or other country during the preceding year? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: 24. Other than the above, did the Agency experience any issues with the Designated National Authorities in relation to the reporting exercise under Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: Section 8: Obligations in relation to export of chemicals other than export notification Substances that cannot be exported unless certain conditions are fulfilled (Article 14(6) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012) 25. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in relation to its involvement in the explicit consent procedure (e.g. in validating the explicit consent metadata inserted by the Designated National Authorities)? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: DNAs decision (in consultation with the Commission supported by the Agency) that export may proceed 60 days after an explicit consent request was made (Article 14(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012) 26. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in processing export notifications subject to the procedure under Article 14(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 or in assisting the Commission in the implementation of this provision? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: Explicit consent reminders (Article 14(6) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012) 27. How many reminders for explicit consent requests did the Agency send pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 14(6) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? First reminder Second reminder Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Validity of explicit consent (Article 14(8) of Regulation (EU) no 649/2012) 28. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in handling cases where the export was allowed to proceed pursuant to the second subparagraph pending a reply to a new request for explicit consent pursuant to point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 14(8) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? ☐ Yes ☐ No Additional information: Section 9: Exchange of information Exchange of information 29. In the context of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012, has the Agency received any requests for providing information of scientific, technical, economic or legal nature concerning the chemicals subject to the regulation? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please provide more details: Reporting on the information transmitted 30. Did the Agency experience difficulties in collecting the information from the Commission and the Member States on the data transmitted? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please provide more details: 31. Did the Agency experience difficulties in compiling the report in accordance with Article 20(4) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please provide more details: Section 10: Technical assistance Cooperation 32. Has the Agency been involved in cooperation with developing countries, countries with economies in transition and non-governmental organisations to improve the proper management of chemicals and in particular to implement the Rotterdam Convention? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, what type of cooperation: ☐ Technical information ☐ Technical expertise for the identification of hazardous pesticides formulations ☐ Technical expertise for the preparation of notifications to the Secretariat ☐ Other If other, please specify. Please specify the countries benefiting from this cooperation: Additional information: Capacity building 33. Has the Agency participated in projects/international activities related to capacity building in chemicals management or supported non-governmental organisations involved in such activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please describe these activities: Section 11: Enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 Role of the Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement (‘the Forum’; Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012) 34. Is there a regular exchange of information within the Forum on coordination of enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please specify the topics discussed. Additional information: 35. Has the Forum coordinated enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 in this reporting period? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please describe these activities: 36. How could the activities of the Forum with regard to the enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 be improved? Involvement of the Agency in enforcement activities 37. Has the Agency been involved in any enforcement activities related to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 other than those handled by the Forum? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please describe these activities: Section 12: IT-related aspects The electronic system for implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 (ePIC) 38. How many external organisations/users are using ePIC for each of the following categories? — Industry: — Designated National Authorities: — Commission: — Customs: — National Enforcement Authorities: 39. Which new/enhanced features have been included in ePIC compared to the previous reporting period: Additional information: 40. How many releases of the system were delivered in the reporting period: 41. Please provide details on the availability of the system to external users: 42. High-level summary of feedback received by the Agency on ePIC from the following user communities: — Industry: — Designated National Authorities: — Commission: — National Enforcement Authorities: — Customs: 43. Please specify identified improvement needs for the IT system, if any: Data dissemination 44. Which data originating from implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 is made publicly available on the Agency's website: 45. Which new data has been made available since the last reporting period: 46. Has the Agency received any feedback on the data relating to implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 made available on its website? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, please provide a high-level summary of this feedback: Section 13: Additional comments 47. Please provide any other information or comments related to the operation of the procedures under Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 that you consider relevant within the framework of the reporting pursuant to Article 22 of that Regulation.

Other acts of the same type

2014/819/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 17 November 2014 concerning the rejection of a request to cancel a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [Jihočeská Niva (PGI)] (notified under document C(2014) 8391)Council and Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/54 of 17 November 2014 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community within the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, as regards the adoption of decisions of the Association Council on the Rules of Procedure of the Association Council and those of the Association Committee and of Sub-Committees, the establishment of two Sub-Committees, and the delegation of certain powers by the Association Council to the Association Committee in Trade configuration Council and Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/55 of 17 November 2014 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community within the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, as regards the adoption of decisions of the Association Council on the Rules of Procedure of the Association Council and those of the Association Committee and of Sub-Committees, the establishment of two Sub-Committees and the delegation of certain powers by the Association Council to the Association Committee in Trade configuration 2014/792/EU: Commission Decision of 13 November 2014 on the Early Warning System to be used by authorising officers of the Commission and by the executive agencies 2014/789/EU: Council Decision of 10 November 2014 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Additional Protocol to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union 2014/790/EU: Council Decision of 10 November 2014 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established under the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, as regards the amendment of Annex II to that Agreement on the coordination of social security schemes 2014/826/EU: Council Decision of 10 November 2014 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the International Maritime Organization during the 94th session of the Maritime Safety Committee on the adoption of amendments to the 2011 Enhanced Survey Programme Code Council Decision (EU) 2015/209 of 10 November 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Faroe Islands associating the Faroe Islands to Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)Council Decision 2014/776/CFSP of 7 November 2014 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran 2014/783/EU: Council Decision of 7 November 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms (Health programme)2014/784/EU: Council Decision of 7 November 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms (Budget Lines 02.03.01 and 12.02.01)2014/785/EU: Council Decision of 7 November 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms (consumer protection)

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next

Browse all EU Legal ActsEvery instrument by type and year, full text free to read section by sectionEuropean Union legislation EU Legal Acts by type and yearGrouped by instrument type and year of enactment, so you can find others of the same kindBrowse by type and year European Union: what this database coversWhich datasets are here, which official source they come from, and how current they areEuropean Union overview