My bookmarksSign up free

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/258 of 13 February 2017 concerning revised performance targets and appropriate measures included in the national or functional airspace block plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council that are not adequate in respect to the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period and setting out obligations for corrective measures (notified under document C(2017) 728) (Text with EEA relevance. )

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/258 of 13 February 2017 concerning revised performance targets and appropriate measures included in the national or functional airspace block plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council that are not adequate in respect to the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period and setting out obligations for corrective measures (notified under document C(2017) 728) (Text with EEA relevance. )

Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/258 · Decision · 5 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

The performance targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency, listed in Annex I, and the appropriate measures included in the revised FABEC performance plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, as incorporated into the Agreement, are not adequate in respect to the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.

Article 2

Switzerland, as regards FABEC, shall take corrective measures regarding its performance targets in the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency, taking account of the suggestion set out in Annex II.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Swiss Confederation.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEX ISupplementary provisions

ANNEX I Performance targets in the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the revised national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 that are not adequate in respect to the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight MEMBER STATE FAB FAB TARGET EN-ROUTE CAPACITY 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 [Belgium/Lux] FAB EC 0,48 0,49 0,48 0,47 Consistent (0,43) [France] [Germany] [The Netherlands] Switzerland KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY Legend Key Item Units (A) Total En-route Determined Costs (in nominal terms and in national currency) (B) Inflation rate (%) (C) Inflation index (100 = 2009) (D) Total En-route Determined Costs (in real 2009 prices and in national currency) (E) Total En-route Services Units (TSUs) (F) En-route Determined Unit Cost (DUC) (in real 2009 prices and in national currency) FAB EC Charging Zone: Switzerland — Currency: CHF   2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 158 188 309 156 222 383 157 901 505 157 939 446 159 353 943 (B) – 1,00 % 0,00 % 0,50 % 1,00 % 1,00 % (C) 99,1 99,1 99,6 100,6 101,6 (D) 159 633 416 157 649 529 158 551 235 157 019 140 156 856 827 (E) 1 452 683 1 470 066 1 490 591 1 512 889 1 537 031 (F) 109,89 107,24 106,37 103,79 102,05

ANNEX IISupplementary provisions

ANNEX II SUGGESTION FOR CORRECTIVE MEASURES The following suggestion for corrective actions in the area of cost-efficiency can be implemented in the short run, taking into account the interdependencies with the remaining key performance areas as well as investment capabilities. Suggestion for corrective measures: Traffic: In July 2015, compared to the information provided in the initial performance plan, Switzerland already revised upwards the traffic planned over RP2 (by + 3,5 % on average) bringing the planned traffic forecast between the low and the base-case STATFOR February 2015 scenario. However, based on actual 2015 traffic and the latest forecast provided by STATFOR (February 2016), it is suggested that the planned traffic be further revised upwards so as to reflect the latest available information. Adjusting the planned traffic for 2018 and 2019 would result, for example, in an en route determined unit cost trend over the second reference period of – 2,3 % per year which is closer to the Union-wide trend (– 3,3 % per year) and an en route determined unit cost trend over the combined period of the first and the second reference period of – 1,4 % per year which is closer to the Union-wide target (– 1,7 % per year).

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next