My bookmarksSign up free

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/765 of 13 April 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (notified under document C(2022) 2285) (Only the Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/765 of 13 April 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (notified under document C(2022) 2285) (Only the Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

Decision (EU) 2022/765 · Decision · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

The performance targets contained in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.

Supplementary provisions

Performance targets included in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX Performance targets included in the draft performance plan submitted by Finland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY Effectiveness of safety management Finland Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D Air navigation service provider concerned Safety management objective 2021 2022 2023 2024 ANS Finland Safety policy and objectives C C C C Safety risk management C C C D Safety assurance C C C C Safety promotion C C C C Safety culture C C C C KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory   2021 2022 2023 2024 Draft en route environment targets of Finland , expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory 0,88  % 0,88  % 0,88  % 0,88  % Reference values for Finland 0,88  % 0,88  % 0,88  % 0,88  % KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight   2021 2022 2023 2024 Draft en route capacity targets of Finland, in minutes of ATFM delay per flight 0,03 0,05 0,05 0,05 Reference values for Finland 0,03 0,05 0,05 0,05 KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services En route charging zone of Finland 2014 baseline value 2019 baseline value 2020 -2021 2022 2023 2024 Draft en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms at 2017 prices) 55,87 EUR 40,70 EUR 81,42 EUR 48,63 EUR 41,43 EUR 40,22 EUR

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next