Article 6
This Decision is addressed to: - Deutsche Bahn AG, Hauptverwaltung, Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 43-45, D-60327 Frankfurt am Main; - Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Belges, rue de France 85, B-1070 Brussels; - NV Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Hoofddirectie, Moreelsepark, Postbus 2025, NL-3500 HA Utrecht; - Transfracht, Deutsche Transportgesellschaft mbH, Gutleutstrasse 160-164, D-60327 Frankfurt am Main; - Intercontainer, rue de France 85, B-1070 Brussels. This Decision shall be enforceable pursuant to Article 192 of the EC Treaty. Done at Brussels, 29 March 1994. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 175, 23. 7. 1968, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 209, 21. 8. 1969, p. 11. (3) OJ No L 237, 24. 8. 1991, p. 25. (4) In the published version of the Decision, some information has hereinafter been omitted, pursuant to the provisions of Article 28 of Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68. (5) In particular Case 15/74 Centrafarm v. Sterling Drug, [1974] ECR, p. 1147. (6) In particular Case 85/76 Hoffmann La Roche v. Commission, [1979] ECR, p. 461. (7) Case 322/81, [1983] ECR, p. 3461. (8) See in particular S. Gilman and M. Graham, The case for a conference rate making authority in the inland sector, July 1990. (9) Case C-279/87 Tippex v. Commission [1990], ECR I, p. 261. (10) Notably in Joined Cases 6 and 7/73 Commercial Solvents v. Commission, [1974] ECR, p. 245 and Case 22/78 Hugin v. Commission, [1979] ECR, p. 1869. (11) See point 58. (12) Case 66/86, [1989] ECR, p. 803. (13) OJ No L 73, 26. 3. 1993, p. 38. (14) OJ No C 57, 27. 2. 1993, p. 5. (15) No figures are given for sea-borne containers, which at all events are more expensive. (16) In particular, Case C-41/90 Klaus Hoefner and Fritz Elser v. Macrotron [1991) ECR I, p. 1979. (17) Kombinierter Ladungsverkehr. (18) Indagine sull'organizzazione ed i costi portuali per la movimentazione di contenitori nei principali scali Europei. Genoa 1990. (19) See point 137. (20) In particular Case 311/84 CBEM v.CLT and IPB ('Telemarketing') [1985] ECR, p. 3271.