Article 4
This Decision is addressed to: Systemform GmbH Geithstraße 18 D-83209 PRIEN This Decision shall be enforceable pursuant to Article 192 of the EC Treaty. Done at Brussels, 4 December 1996. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission (1) OJ No 13, 21. 2. 1962, p. 204/62. (2) OJ No 127, 20. 8. 1963, p. 2268/63. (3) Annex 14 to letter of 30 November 1995 from Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton on behalf of Systemform GmbH. (4) Letter from Eurinvest to the Commission dated 5 February 1996. (5) Letter from Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton to the Commission on behalf of Systemform GmbH of 3 October 1995. (6) Annex 4 to letter from Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton to the Commission on behalf of Systemform GmbH of 30 November 1995. (7) In the published version of the Decision, some information has hereinafter been omitted, pursuant to the provisions of Article 21 (2) of Regulation No 17 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets. (8) Letter from Eurinvest to the Commission of 5 February 1996. (9) Annex 1 to letter from Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton to the Commission on behalf of Systemform of 10 April 1996. (10) Annex 6 to complaint. (11) The fact that high and low-volume equipment form separate markets was alleged in the original complaint, and agreed by Systemform in their letter to the Commission of 30 November 1995. Remaining analysis is based on product information from both Novalliance and Systemform. (12) OJ No L 173, 30. 6. 1983, p. 1. (13) [1966] ECR 299.