Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Austria. Done at Brussels, 5 June 1996. For the Commission Hans VAN DEN BROEK Member of the Commission (1) OJ No C 71, 9. 3. 1996, p. 9. (2) Case C 50/95 (ex N 317/95), OJ No C 71, 9. 3. 1996, p. 6. (3) OJ No C 213, 19. 8. 1992, p. 2. (4) Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on economic aid to the Republic of Hungary and the Polish People's Republic (OJ No L 375, 23. 12. 1989, p. 11). (5) Common position (EC) No 6/95 adopted by the Council on 22 May 1995 with a view to adopting a Council Regulation on the implementation of the European Communities investment partners Financial Instrument for the countries of Latin America, Asia, the Mediterranean region and South Africa (OJ No C 160, 26. 6. 1995, p. 8). (6) See point 25 (11) of Procedural and Substantive Rules in the Field of State Aid (Guidelines issued by the EFTA Surveillance Authority) (OJ No L 231, 3. 9. 1994, p. 57). (7) Case C-142/87, Belgium v. Commission ('Tubemeuse`) [1990] ECR I-959, paragraph 35. (8) OJ No C 68, 9. 3. 1996, p. 9. (9) Case C-142/87, Belgium v. Commission ('Tubemeuse`) [1990] ECR I-959, paragraphs 38 to 40. (10) OJ No C 31, 3. 2. 1979, p. 9. (11) COM(95) 42 final, p. 5. (12) SI (95) 1000, p. 14. (13) See for example Article 6 of the proposal for the conclusion of a Cooperation Agreement with Nepal, (OJ No C 338, 16. 12. 1995, p. 10), and Article 12 of the proposal for the conclusion of an Interregional Framework Cooperation Agreement with the Southern Cone Common Market and its Member Countries (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay), (OJ No C 14, 19. 1. 1996, p. 4). (14) OJ No L 107, 30. 4. 1996, p. 4. (15) OJ No C 3, 5. 1. 1985, p. 2. (16) OJ No C 29, 2. 2. 1996, p. 4.