Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic. Done at Brussels, 18 June 1997. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 192, 24. 7. 1990, p. 10. (2) OJ L 74, 22. 3. 1996, p. 13. (3) OJ C 257, 4. 9. 1996, p. 3. (4) OJ C 213, 6. 8. 1993, p. 1. (5) OJ C 379, 31. 12. 1994, p. 4. (6) OJ L 268, 19. 10. 1994, p. 15. (7) OJ L 165, 19. 6. 1992, p. 27. (8) Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case 1/86 Commission v. Belgium [1987] ECR 2797. (9) For an entity to benefit from the derogation, there must be de facto a sufficient degree of competition (Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-392/93 British Telecommunications [1996] ECR I-1631). (10) Public network services in Europe 1995, CIT research, p. 88. (11) Op. cit. p. 303. (12) Tarifica study implemented for the European Commission DG XIII. (13) A direct comparison of the telephony tariffs of OTE with the Community average (which is not a weighted average) would not be appropriate, given that the tariff structures of the 15 Community TOs are still widely divergent and in addition, given that they are currently in the process of rebalancing tariffs. (14) OJ L 133, 24. 5. 1997, p. 19. (15) OJ L 321, 30. 12. 1995, p. 6. (16) OJ C 275, 20. 10. 1995, p. 2. (17) Case C-259/94 Commission v. Hellenic Republic [1995] ECR, I-1947.