Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Ireland. Done at Brussels, 17 February 2003. For the Commission Mario Monti Member of the Commission (1) OJ C 308, 1.11.2001, p. 2. (2) OJ C 2, 6.1.1998, p. 1. (3) OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3. (4) See footnote 1. (5) Report of Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) to ECOFIN Council, SN 1401/99, 23.11.1999. (6) See footnote 2. (7) See footnote 1. (8) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1. (9) Judgments of the Court of 14 October 1987 in Case 248/84 Germany v. Commission [1987] ECR 4013, at paragraphs 17-18; of 5 October 1994 in Case C-47/91 Italy v. Commission [1994] ECR I-4635, at paragraphs 20-21; of 17 June 1999 in Case C-75/97 Belgium v. Commission [1999] ECR I-3671, at paragraph 48; of 19 October 2000, Joined Cases C-15/98 and C-105/99, Italy and Sardegna Lines v. Commission [2000] ECR I-8855, at paragraph 51. (10) See footnote 3. (11) Commission Communication on the method for the application of Article 92(3)(a) and (c) to regional aid: OJ C 212, 12.8.1988, p. 2. (12) Point 6, first indent, of the 1988 Communication on regional aid. (13) See for example Commission Decisions 1996/616/EC, OJ L 274, 26.10.1996, p. 26 and 2002/411/EC, OJ L 144, 1.6.2002, p. 49. (14) Point 6, first indent, of the 1988 Communication on regional aid. (15) OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p. 9; see heading 2. (16) See for example Article 2 of Commission Decision on the Fiscal Regime in the Azores, SG (2002) 233143. (17) OJ C 334, 12.12.1995, p. 4. (18) See for example case C-169/1995, Spain v. Commission ECR [1997] I 135, paragraph 47. (19) See footnote 8. (20) Case C-265/85, Van den Bergh en Jurgens BV v. Commission [1987] ECR 1155, at paragraph 44. (21) Moniteur belge, 13.1.1983 (Dossier No 1982-12-30/69). (22) Written question No 1735/90, OJ C 63, 11.3.1991, p. 37.