My bookmarksSign up free

2004/50/EC: Commission Decision of 17 September 2003 on the… Article 2

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Done at Brussels, 17 September 2003. For the Commission Mario Monti Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1. (2) OJ C 69, 22.3.2003, p. 9. (3) See footnote 2. (4) See Commission Decision of 28 March 2001 relating to State aid C 18/2001 - United Kingdom, Climate Change Levy, (OJ C 185, 30.6.2001, p. 22), and in particular p. 35 and 36 on the exemption for electricity from some energy sources. (5) OJ C 37, 3.2.2001, p. 3. (6) OJ L 283, 27.10.2001, p. 33. (7) OJ L 205, 2.8.2002, p. 1. (8) Fisc 311 Rev 1 ADD of 9.12.2002. (9) It cannot be excluded that suppliers do not pass on the entire benefit of the exemption and keep a small part of it through their price negotiations with electricity generators using CMM. This is nevertheless supposed to be minimal. In all previous cases concerning exemptions or reductions from eco-taxes on electricity charged to suppliers, the Commission has considered that the real beneficiaries of the aid are the producers of electricity. (10) [2001] ECR I-2099. (11) NN 27/2000 - Germany, EEG law, OJ C 164, 10.7.2002, p. 5. (12) For the same reasoning see Commission Decision on State aid N74/B/2002 - Finland; OJ C 59, 14.3.2003, p. 23, and in particular point 3.2.2 of the decision. (13) See footnote 8.

Read the full instrument →

Other provisions in 2004/50/EC: Commission Decision of 17 September 2003 on the…

Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗ · Data as of 2026-07-04

CitationArticle 2 of 2004/50/EC: Commission Decision of 17 September 2003 on the… (LawPlayer, data as of 2026-07-04)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU, provided the source is acknowledged.

What to look at next