My bookmarksSign up free

2004/254/EC: Commission Decision of 24 January 2001… Article 2

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to: Metso Corporation Fabianinkatu 9A PO Box 220 FIN - 00101 Helsinki. Done at Brussels, 24 January 2001. For the Commission Mario Monti Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 1; corrected version in OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13. (2) OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p. 1. (3) OJ C 76, 25.3.2004. (4) See case IV/M.1379-Valmet/Rauma, 8 February 1999. (5) Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk. (6) The accurate definitions for larger and smaller equipment as provided by the parties are detailed in Annex I to this document. (7) The HP700 has physical characteristics similar to that of the HP800, except that its nominal power is 560 kW instead of 600 kW. (8) Strictly speaking, the Z18 cone crusher cannot be compared with the parties' high capacity cone crushers since its nominal power rating is significantly lower (330 kW). (9) OJ L 207, 23.7.1998, p. 1. (10) OJ L 331, 7.12.1998, p. 1. (11) In view of the low market volumes in most EEA Member States, market shares for A& C products have been calculated as an average of units sold between 1997 and 1999. (12) Excluding Chinese and Russian producers.

Read the full instrument →

Other provisions in 2004/254/EC: Commission Decision of 24 January 2001…

Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗ · Data as of 2026-07-04

CitationArticle 2 of 2004/254/EC: Commission Decision of 24 January 2001… (LawPlayer, data as of 2026-07-04)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU, provided the source is acknowledged.

What to look at next