ANNEX VISupplementary provisions
ANNEX VI CONTENT OF THE EVALUATION REPORT Evaluation reports shall at least contain the following information: I. General analysis of control, inspection and enforcement activities carried out The Member States concerned shall report the following information by sea basin according to Annexes I to V: — Results of the risk assessment, with description of risks and threats identified by the concerned Member State for the fisheries covered by the specific control and inspection programmes (providing information on the review/update process where appropriate); — Summary table of the fleet segments identified and their risk level; — Detailed content of the risk management strategy. II. Detailed analysis of control, inspection and enforcement activities carried out The Member States concerned shall report the following information by sea basin according to Annexes I to V. Table 1 Summary data of inspections at sea Patrol days [days] No of total inspections at sea No of total suspected serious infringements No of inspections at sea on fishing vessels in the highest risk fleet segment categories No of inspections at sea on fishing vessels in the second highest risk fleet segment categories No of inspections at sea on fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in the highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in the second highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest risk fleet segment categories Total serious infringement rate ( *1 ) average [%] Serious infringement rate ( *1 ) for fishing vessels in the highest fleet segment risk categories [%] Serious infringement rate ( *1 ) for fishing vessels in the second highest fleet segment risk categories [%] Serious infringement rate ( *1 ) for fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest fleet segment risk categories [%] Table 2 Summary data of surveillance at sea Number of aerial surveillance (hours) No of total sightings from aerial surveillance No of total sightings from patrol vessels No of total suspected serious infringements No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in the highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in the second highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest risk fleet segment categories Table 3 Summary data of inspection activities at landing (inspections in ports and before first sale) Inspection men/days [optional] No of total inspections at landing No of total suspected serious infringements No of inspections on fishing vessels in the highest risk fleet segment categories No of inspections on fishing vessels in the second highest risk fleet segment categories No of inspections on fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in the highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in the second highest risk fleet segment categories No of suspected serious infringements for fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest risk fleet segment categories Serious infringement rate ( *2 ) average (total) Serious infringement rate ( *2 ) for fishing vessels in the highest risk fleet segment categories Serious infringement rate ( *2 ) for fishing vessels in the second highest risk fleet segment categories Serious infringement rate ( *2 ) for fishing vessels in others than the highest and second highest fleet segment risk categories [%] Table 4 Summary data of inspection activities ashore on operators (excluding the inspections in ports and before first sale reported in Table 3) Inspection men/days ashore [optional] No of total inspections ashore No of total suspected serious infringements Serious infringement rate ( *3 ) III. Control of the landing obligation Member States shall provide specific details on the resources, instruments and means provided for the control of the landing obligation, and the results of the control. In particular, at least the following information should be provided: 1. Total number of vessels with control observer on board; 2. Number of vessels equipped with close-circuit television CCTV; 3. Number of sea inspections carried out with last haul analysis; 4. Means of control used other than those listed in points 1 to 3, specifying which other means of control are used (e.g. aerial surveillance by aircrafts, REM, drone); 5. Total number of infringements of the landing obligation, specifying the number of those related to non-compliance with provisions in relevant discard plans. IV. Periodical Information on detected infringements Table 5 Format for the communication of the information to be provided according to Article 11 for each inspection with suspected infringement to be included in the report: Element name Code Description and content Identification of inspection II ISO alpha2 country code + 9 digits, e.g. DK201900001 Date of inspection DA YYYY-MM-DD Type of inspection or control IT Sea, landing, transport, first sale, storage, marketing, transfer, control transfer, caging, transhipment, release, document (to be indicated) Identification of each fishing vessel, vehicle or operator ID Union fleet register number and name of the fishing vessel, ICCAT registration No (if applicable) Traps or vehicle identification, and/or company name of the operator, including farm installations. Fishing gear type GE Gear code based on FAO's International Standard Statistical Classification of the Fishing Gear Type of suspected infringement TS Description of the infringement with indication of the provision(s) concerned. If applicable, indicate type of infringement detected, using the following codes: — For serious infringements: — Code 1 to 12 in reference to the number (left column) in the Annex XXX of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011, — Code ‘13’, ‘14’ and ‘15’ in reference to Article 90(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the Control Regulation respectively, — Code ‘a’ to ‘p’ in reference to the Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) 2016/1627 of the European Parliament and the Council ( 1 ) , — For infringements that do not fall under EU regulation Code 99. Infringements related to legislation adopted by RFMOs and transposed into EU law shall be identified by the relevant provision and Regulation that has been violated. Amount of fish concerned and related to the infringement, by species AF Indicate the quantities concerned of each one of the species on board or (for live BFT) in the cage (for BFT: weight and numbers). State of play follow up FU Indicate state of play: PENDING, APPEAL PENDING, CONFIRMED or DISMISSED Fine (when available) SF Fine in EUR Confiscation SC CATCH/GEAR/OTHER for physical confiscation. Amount confiscated in case of value of catch/gear in EUR, e.g. 10 000 ; Other SO In case of withdrawal of license/authorisation, indicate LI or AU + number of days, e.g. AU30 Points (when available) SP Number of points assigned in accordance with Article 126(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011, e.g. 12; Remarks RM In case of no action taken, following detection of a serious infringement, explanation why in free text. V. Analysis of target benchmarks expressed in terms of improved compliance levels If the Member State applies alternative target benchmarks as referred to in Article 7(2) of this Decision, the following information shall be reported: Table 6 Achievement of improved compliance levels Level of risk [Very high/high/medium/low] Description of the activity threat/risk/fleet segment — Level of the threat/risk at the beginning of the year, expressed in compliance level — Target improvement of the compliance level — Level of the threat/risk at the end of the year, expressed in compliance level — No of inspections per threat/risk — No of serious infringements detected per threat/risk, including serious infringements rate and trend (by comparison with two previous years) — Proportion of inspections on fishing vessels/operators resulting in one or more serious infringements — Ex post analysis, including evaluation of the deterrent effect and explanation in case the target compliance level has not been reached VI. Analysis of other inspection and control activities: transhipment, aerial surveillance, importation/exportation VII. Actions such as training or information sessions designed to have an impact on compliance by fishing vessels and operators VIII. Proposal(s) for improving effectiveness of control, inspection and enforcement activities (for each member state concerned) ( *1 ) The infringement rate shall be intended as the ratio between the No of suspected infringement and the No inspections, expressed in % ( *2 ) The infringement rate shall be intended as the ratio between the No of suspected infringement and the No inspections, expressed in % ( *3 ) The infringement rate shall be intended as the ratio between the No of suspected infringement and the No inspections, expressed in % ( 1 ) Regulation (EU) 2016/1627 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 on a multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 ( OJ L 252, 16.9.2016, p. 1 ).