My bookmarksSign up free
← Arbitration Act 2001

Arbitration Act 2001 s 52C

s 52C Effect of award involving IPR

52C.—(1) This section applies if an award deciding an IPR dispute is made in arbitral proceedings.[23/2019] (2) The fact that a person is a third‑party licensee or third‑party holder of a security interest in respect of the IPR does not of itself make the person a person claiming through or under a party to the arbitral proceedings for the purposes of section 44(1).[23/2019] (3) However, subsection (2) does not affect any right or liability between a third‑party licensee or third‑party holder of a security interest and a party to the arbitral proceedings whether —(a) arising in contract; or (b) arising by operation of law.[23/2019] (4) In this section —“third‑party holder of a security interest”, in relation to an IPR in dispute in arbitral proceedings, means a person who —(a) is a holder of a security interest in respect of the IPR granted by a party to the arbitral proceedings; but (b) is not a party to the arbitral proceedings; “third‑party licensee”, in relation to an IPR in dispute in arbitral proceedings, means a person who —(a) is a licensee (whether or not an exclusive licensee) of the IPR under a licence granted by a party to the arbitral proceedings; but (b) is not a party to the arbitral proceedings.[23/2019]

Read this section in the full act → · Open PART 9A →

Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Read the official text ↗

Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.

The Singapore legislation on this platform is subject to copyright of the Singapore Government and is used/reproduced for the purposes of this platform with the permission of the Attorney-General's Chambers. Users of this platform may check Singapore Statutes Online for the latest version of the Singapore legislation.

What to look at next