My bookmarksSign up free
← Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992

Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 s 70

s 70 Offence of prejudicing investigation

70.—(1) Where, in relation to an investigation into drug dealing or criminal conduct (as the case may be), an order under section 36 has been made or has been applied for and has not been refused or a warrant under section 40 has been issued, a person who, knowing or suspecting that the investigation is taking place, makes any disclosure which is likely to prejudice the investigation shall be guilty of an offence.[21/2014] (2) In proceedings against a person for an offence under this section, it is a defence to prove that —(a) the person did not know or suspect that the disclosure was likely to prejudice the investigation; or (b) the person had lawful authority or reasonable excuse for making the disclosure. (3) Any person who commits an offence under this section shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $30,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both.[49

Read this section in the full act → · Open PART 7 →

Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Read the official text ↗

Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.

The Singapore legislation on this platform is subject to copyright of the Singapore Government and is used/reproduced for the purposes of this platform with the permission of the Attorney-General's Chambers. Users of this platform may check Singapore Statutes Online for the latest version of the Singapore legislation.

What to look at next