熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊
Companies Act 1967

Companies Act 1967 s 208

s 208 Auditors and other persons to enjoy qualified privilege in certain circumstances

208.—(1) An auditor shall not, in the absence of malice on the auditor’s part, be liable to any action for defamation at the suit of any person in respect of any statement which the auditor makes in the course of the auditor’s duties as such, whether the statement is made orally or in writing.(2) A person shall not, in the absence of malice on the person’s part, be liable to any action for defamation at the suit of any person in respect of the publication of any document prepared by an auditor in the course of the auditor’s duties and required by this Act to be lodged with the Registrar. (3) This section does not limit or affect any other right, privilege or immunity that an auditor or other person has as defendant in an action for defamation. —(1) An auditor shall not, in the absence of malice on the auditor’s part, be liable to any action for defamation at the suit of any person in respect of any statement which the auditor makes in the course of the auditor’s duties as such, whether the statement is made orally or in writing. (2) A person shall not, in the absence of malice on the person’s part, be liable to any action for defamation at the suit of any person in respect of the publication of any document prepared by an auditor in the course of the auditor’s duties and required by this Act to be lodged with the Registrar. (3) This section does not limit or affect any other right, privilege or immunity that an auditor or other person has as defendant in an action for defamation.

Read this section in the full act → · Open its part →

Read the official text ↗

Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.