s 107 Amendment of Defamation Act 1957
107.—(1) In the Defamation Act 1957, after section 18, insert — “Enhanced damages when defendant fails to comply with request to publish reply statement to online defamation 18A.—(1) In any action for defamation in relation to a statement published at an online location, if it is proved that —(a) the claimant has made a reasonable request that the defendant publish a reasonable statement by way of explanation or contradiction to the alleged defamatory statement (referred to in this section as a reply statement); and (b) the defendant has refused or neglected to publish a reasonable reply statement, or has published it in a manner that is not adequate or reasonable having regard to all the circumstances, the court may award enhanced damages to the claimant as the court thinks is just and equitable in the circumstances. (2) The award of enhanced damages that a court may award under subsection (1) —(a) is in addition to any general and special damages that may be awarded; (b) is distinct from punitive damages or aggravated damages, and the principles governing the award of those damages need not apply to an award of enhanced damages; and (c) may in the court’s discretion be awarded in addition to or in lieu of any punitive or aggravated damages. (3) In this section, “online location” means any internet domain, website, webpage, chatroom, chat group, channel, group, forum, social media account page or any other location, that can be accessed by means of the Internet. (4) The Minister may make regulations —(a) to prescribe the maximum limit of enhanced damages that a court may award under subsection (1) and such regulations may make provisions of a saving or transitional nature; and (b) to clarify the application of the Limitation Act 1959 to an action for a claim for enhanced damages under this Act including prescribing a period of limitation for that action.”. (2) For a period of 2 years after the date of commencement of this section, the Minister may, by order in the Gazette, make provisions of a saving or transitional nature consequent on the enactment of this section that the Minister may consider necessary or expedient. —(1) In the Defamation Act 1957, after section 18, insert — “Enhanced damages when defendant fails to comply with request to publish reply statement to online defamation 18A.—(1) In any action for defamation in relation to a statement published at an online location, if it is proved that —(a) the claimant has made a reasonable request that the defendant publish a reasonable statement by way of explanation or contradiction to the alleged defamatory statement (referred to in this section as a reply statement); and (b) the defendant has refused or neglected to publish a reasonable reply statement, or has published it in a manner that is not adequate or reasonable having regard to all the circumstances, the court may award enhanced damages to the claimant as the court thinks is just and equitable in the circumstances. (2) The award of enhanced damages that a court may award under subsection (1) —(a) is in addition to any general and special damages that may be awarded; (b) is distinct from punitive damages or aggravated damages, and the principles governing the award of those damages need not apply to an award of enhanced damages; and (c) may in the court’s discretion be awarded in addition to or in lieu of any punitive or aggravated damages. (3) In this section, “online location” means any internet domain, website, webpage, chatroom, chat group, channel, group, forum, social media account page or any other location, that can be accessed by means of the Internet. (4) The Minister may make regulations —(a) to prescribe the maximum limit of enhanced damages that a court may award under subsection (1) and such regulations may make provisions of a saving or transitional nature; and (b) to clarify the application of the Limitation Act 1959 to an action for a claim for enhanced damages under this Act including prescribing a period of limitation for that action.”. —(1) In any action for defamation in relation to a statement published at an online location, if it is proved that —(a) the claimant has made a reasonable request that the defendant publish a reasonable statement by way of explanation or contradiction to the alleged defamatory statement (referred to in this section as a reply statement); and (b) the defendant has refused or neglected to publish a reasonable reply statement, or has published it in a manner that is not adequate or reasonable having regard to all the circumstances, the court may award enhanced damages to the claimant as the court thinks is just and equitable in the circumstances. (2) The award of enhanced damages that a court may award under subsection (1) —(a) is in addition to any general and special damages that may be awarded; (b) is distinct from punitive damages or aggravated damages, and the principles governing the award of those damages need not apply to an award of enhanced damages; and (c) may in the court’s discretion be awarded in addition to or in lieu of any punitive or aggravated damages. (3) In this section, “online location” means any internet domain, website, webpage, chatroom, chat group, channel, group, forum, social media account page or any other location, that can be accessed by means of the Internet. (4) The Minister may make regulations —(a) to prescribe the maximum limit of enhanced damages that a court may award under subsection (1) and such regulations may make provisions of a saving or transitional nature; and (b) to clarify the application of the Limitation Act 1959 to an action for a claim for enhanced damages under this Act including prescribing a period of limitation for that action.”. (2) For a period of 2 years after the date of commencement of this section, the Minister may, by order in the Gazette, make provisions of a saving or transitional nature consequent on the enactment of this section that the Minister may consider necessary or expedient.