熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊
Personal Data Protection Act 2012

Personal Data Protection Act 2012 s 48B

s 48B Prohibition on use of dictionary attacks and address‑harvesting software

48B.—(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), a person must not send, cause to be sent or authorise the sending of an applicable message.[40/2020] (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an employee (P) who sends, causes to be sent or authorises the sending of an applicable message in good faith —(a) in the course of P’s employment; or (b) in accordance with instructions given to P by or on behalf of P’s employer in the course of P’s employment.[40/2020] (3) However, subsection (2) does not apply to a person (P) who, at the time the applicable message was sent, was an officer or a partner of the sender and it is proved that —(a) P knew or ought reasonably to have known that the telephone number is an applicable telephone number; and (b) the applicable message was sent with P’s consent or connivance, or the sending of the applicable message was attributable to any neglect on P’s part.[40/2020] (4) In this section —“corporation” has the meaning given by section 52(7); “officer” —(a) in relation to a corporation, has the meaning given by section 52(7); or (b) in relation to an unincorporated association (other than a partnership), has the meaning given by section 52A(7); “partner”, in relation to a partnership, has the meaning given by section 52A(7).[40/2020] —(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), a person must not send, cause to be sent or authorise the sending of an applicable message.[40/2020] (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an employee (P) who sends, causes to be sent or authorises the sending of an applicable message in good faith —(a) in the course of P’s employment; or (b) in accordance with instructions given to P by or on behalf of P’s employer in the course of P’s employment.[40/2020] (3) However, subsection (2) does not apply to a person (P) who, at the time the applicable message was sent, was an officer or a partner of the sender and it is proved that —(a) P knew or ought reasonably to have known that the telephone number is an applicable telephone number; and (b) the applicable message was sent with P’s consent or connivance, or the sending of the applicable message was attributable to any neglect on P’s part.[40/2020] (4) In this section —“corporation” has the meaning given by section 52(7); “officer” —(a) in relation to a corporation, has the meaning given by section 52(7); or (b) in relation to an unincorporated association (other than a partnership), has the meaning given by section 52A(7); “partner”, in relation to a partnership, has the meaning given by section 52A(7).[40/2020]

Read this section in the full act → · Open its part →

Read the official text ↗

Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.