My bookmarksSign up free
Source

96/134/EC: Commission Decision of 16 January 1996 amending Decision 91/448/EEC concerning guidelines for classification referred to in Article 4 of Council Directive 90/219/EEC on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (Text with EEA relevance)

96/134/EC: Commission Decision of 16 January 1996 amending Decision 91/448/EEC concerning guidelines for classification referred to in Article 4 of Council Directive 90/219/EEC on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (Text with EEA relevance)

Decision 91/448/EEC · Decision · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

Open ↗

The Annex to Decision 91/448/EEC is replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

Open ↗

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 16 January 1996. For the Commission Ritt BJERREGAARD Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 117, 8. 5. 1990, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 217, 18. 11. 1994, p. 29. (3) OJ No L 239, 28. 8. 1991, p. 23.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

Open ↗

Guidelines for the classification of genetically modified micro-organisms into Group I according to Article 4 (3) of Directive 90/219/EEC For classification of GMMs into Group I, the following guidelines should be used for the further interpretation of the criteria established by Annex II of Directive 90/219/EEC, and for the further development by competent authorities of more detailed guidelines aimed at specific cases: 1. Criteria (i) - (iii) refer to immunocompetent humans and healthy animals or plants. 2. As regards criterion (i) of Annex II, the following guidelines are given: (a) in deciding whether the recipient or parental micro-organism is likely to cause disease to animals or plants consideration should be given to the environment likely to be exposed to the recipient or parental micro-organism; (b) non-virulent strains of acknowledged pathogenic species could be considered as unlikely to cause disease and as satisfying criterion (i) in Annex II, provided that: (i) the non-virulent strain has an established record of safety in the laboratory and/or industry with no adverse effects on human, animal or plant health; and/or (ii) the strain is stably deficient in genetic material that determines virulence, or has stable mutations known to sufficiently reduce virulence. When it is not essential to remove all virulence determinants from a pathogen, particular attention should be paid to any toxin genes, plasmid- or phageborne virulence determinants and harmful adventitious agents. On such occasions a case by case evaluation will be needed. 3. As regards criterion (ii) of Annex II, the following guidelines are given: (a) The vector/insert should not contain genes expressing an active protein or transcript (e. g. virulence determinants, toxins, etc.) at a level and in a form which endow the genetically modified micro-organism with a phenotype likely to cause disease to humans, animals or plants. In any case, when the vector/insert contains sequences which are involved in the expression of harmful traits in certain micro-organisms, but which do not endow the GMM with a phenotype likely to cause disease to humans, animals or plants, or likely to cause adverse effects on the environment, then the vector/insert should not be self-transmissible and should be poorly mobilizable. (b) In the case of Type B operations, special consideration should be given to the following: - vectors should not be self-transmissible or contain functional transposing sequences; and should be poorly mobilizable, - in deciding whether the vector/insert is likely to endow the genetically modified micro-organism with a phenotype likely to cause disease to humans, animals or plants or to cause adverse effects in the environment, it is important to ensure that the vector/insert is well characterized or limited in size as much as possible to the genetic sequences required to perform the intended function. 4. As regards criterion (iii) of Annex II, the following guidelines are given: (a) in deciding whether the gentically modified micro-organism is likely to cause adverse effects on the environment or disease to animals or plants, consideration should be given to the environment likely to be exposed to the GMMs. (b) in the case of type B operations, in addition to criterion (iii), consideration should be given to the following: - the genetically modified micro-organism should not transfer any resistance markers to micro-organisms, if such transfer compromise disease treatment; - the genetically modified micro-organism should be as safe in the industrial setting as the recipient or parental micro-organism, or have characteristics that limit survival and gene transfer. (c) other GMMs which could be included in Group I if they are without adverse effects on the environment and meet the conditions in Annex II (i) are those that are constructed entirely from a single prokaryotic recipient (including its indigenous plasmids, transposons and viruses), or from a single eukaryotic recipient (including its chloroplasts, mitochondria, plasmids, but excluding viruses), or consist entirely of genetic sequences from different species that exchange these sequences by known physiological processes. Before deciding if these GMMs are to be included in Group I it should be considered whether they are excluded from the Directive under the provisions of Annex I B (4), taking into account that self-cloning means the removal of nucleic acid from a cell of an organism, followed by reinsertion of all or part of that nucleic acid - with or without further enzymic chemical or mechanical steps - into the same cell type (or cell-line) or into cells of phylogenetically closely related species which can naturally exchange genetic material with the donor species.

Other acts of the same type
2011/27/EU: Council Decision of 12 July 2010 on the signing and provisional application of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes2012/192/EU: Council Decision of 12 July 2010 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Arrangement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation on the participation by those States in the work of the committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers as regards the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis2010/381/: Commission Decision of 8 July 2010 on emergency measures applicable to consignments of aquaculture products imported from India and intended for human consumption (notified under document C(2010) 4563) (Text with EEA relevance)Decision No 388/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 providing macrofinancial assistance to Ukraine2010/612/EU: Commission Decision of 6 July 2010 on measure C 48/07 (ex NN 60/07) implemented by Poland for WRJ and WRJ-Serwis (notified under document C(2010) 4476) Text with EEA relevance2011/4/EU: Commission Decision of 6 July 2010 on State aid C 34/08 (ex N 170/08) which Germany is planning to implement in favour of Deutsche Solar AG (notified under document C(2010) 4489) Text with EEA relevance2013/516/EU: Commission Decision of 6 July 2010 on the measure C 40/07 (ex NN 48/07) implemented by Romania for ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. (formerly Petrotub Roman S.A.) (notified under document C(2010) 4492) Text with EEA relevance2010/376/: Commission Decision of 2 July 2010 on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for certain products in the sleep environment of children pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council2010/370/: Commission Decision of 1 July 2010 on the allocation to Spain of additional days at sea within ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa excluding the Gulf of Cadiz (notified under document C(2010) 4330)2010/373/: Commission Decision of 1 July 2010 amending Decision 2004/452/EC laying down a list of bodies whose researchers may access confidential data for scientific purposes (notified under document C(2010) 4385) (Text with EEA relevance )2010/368/: Commission Decision of 30 June 2010 amending Decision 2006/771/EC on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (notified under document C(2010) 4313) (Text with EEA relevance )2010/365/: Council Decision of 29 June 2010 on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next