My bookmarksSign up free

2009/450/EC: Commission Decision of 8 June 2009 on the detailed interpretation of the aviation activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2009) 4293) (Text with EEA relevance)

2009/450/EC: Commission Decision of 8 June 2009 on the detailed interpretation of the aviation activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2009) 4293) (Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 2003/87/EC · Decision · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

The detailed interpretation of aviation activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC is set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX Guidelines on the detailed interpretation of the aviation activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC 1.   DEFINITION OF AVIATION ACTIVITIES 1. The term ‘flight’ means one flight sector that is a flight or one of a series of flights which commences at a parking place of the aircraft and terminates at a parking place of the aircraft. 2. The term ‘aerodrome’ means a defined area on land or water, including buildings, installations and equipment, intended to be used either wholly or in part for the arrival, departure and surface movement of aircraft. 3. If an aircraft operator performs an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC, it falls under the Community scheme independently of whether it is on the list of aircraft operators published by the Commission pursuant to Article 18a(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC. 2.   INTERPRETATION OF THE EXEMPTIONS 4. Under the category of activity ‘Aviation’, Annex I to the Directive 2003/87/EC lists which type of flights are exempted from the Community scheme. 2.1.    Exemption under subparagraph (a) 5. This exemption shall be interpreted according to the exclusive purpose of the flight. 6. Immediate family comprises exclusively the spouse, any partner considered as equivalent to the spouse, the children and the parents. 7. Government ministers are the members of the government as listed in the national official journal of the country concerned. Members of regional or local governments of a country do not qualify for exemption under this subparagraph. 8. An official mission means a mission in which the person concerned is acting in an official capacity. 9. Flights for the positioning or ferrying of the aircraft are not covered by this exemption. 10. Flights that Eurocontrol’s Central Route Charges Office has identified for route charges exemption applicability (hereinafter CRCO exemption code) as ‘S’ are presumed to be flights performed exclusively for the transport, on official mission, of a reigning monarch and his immediate family, heads of state, heads of government and government ministers substantiated by an appropriate status indicator in the flight plan. 2.2.    Exemptions under subparagraph (b) 2.2.1.    Military flights 11. Military flights mean flights directly related to the conduct of military activities. 12. Military flights performed by civil registered aircraft are not covered by this exemption. Similarly, civil flights performed by military aircraft are not exempted under subparagraph (b). 13. Flights with the CRCO exemption code ‘M’ or ‘X’ are presumed to be exempted military flights. 2.2.2.    Customs and police flights 14. Customs and police flights performed by both civil registered and military aircraft are exempted. 15. Flights with the CRCO exemption code ‘P’ are presumed to be exempted customs and police flights. 2.3.    Exemptions under subparagraph (c) 16. In relation to the below categories of flight, flights for the positioning or ferrying of the aircraft and the flights carrying exclusively equipment and personnel directly involved in providing the related services are covered by the exemption. Furthermore, these exemptions do not distinguish between flights performed through the use of public and private resources. 2.3.1.    Search and rescue flights 17. Flights related to search and rescue mean flights offering search and rescue services. Search and rescue service means the performance of distress monitoring, communication, coordination and search and rescue functions, initial medical assistance or medical evacuation, through the use of public and private resources, including cooperating aircraft, vessels and other craft and installations. 18. Flights with the CRCO exemption code ‘R’ and flights identified with STS/SAR in field 18 of the flight plan are presumed to be exempted search and rescue flights. 2.3.2.    Firefighting flights 19. Firefighting flights mean flights performed exclusively to provide aerial firefighting services, which means the use of aircraft and other aerial resources to combat wildfires. 20. Flights identified with STS/FFR in field 18 of the flight plan are presumed to be exempted firefighting flights. 2.3.3.    Humanitarian flights 21. Humanitarian flights mean flights operated exclusively for humanitarian purposes which carry relief personnel and relief supplies such as food, clothing, shelter, medical and other items during or after an emergency and/or disaster and/or are used to evacuate persons from a place where their life or health is threatened by such emergency and/or disaster to a safe haven in the same State or another State willing to receive such persons. 22. Flights with the CRCO exemption code ‘H’ and flights identified with STS/HUM in field 18 of the flight plan are presumed to be exempted humanitarian flights. 2.3.4.    Emergency medical service flights 23. Emergency medical service flights mean flights the exclusive purpose of which is to facilitate emergency medical assistance, where immediate and rapid transportation is essential, by carrying medical personnel, medical supplies, including equipment, blood, organs, drugs, or ill or injured persons and other persons directly involved. 24. Flights identified with STS/MEDEVAC or STS/HOSP in field 18 of the flight plan are presumed to be exempted emergency medical service flights. 2.4.    Exemption under subparagraph (f) 25. Flights with the CRCO exemption code ‘T’ and flights identified with RMK/‘Training flight’ in field 18 of the flight plan are presumed to be exempted under subparagraph (f). 2.5.    Exemptions under subparagraph (g) 26. In relation to the below categories of flight, flights for the positioning or ferrying of the aircraft are not covered. 2.5.1.    Flights performed exclusively for the purpose of scientific research 27. This category exempts flights the only purpose of which is to carry out scientific research. The scientific research must be partially or totally performed in-flight for the exemption to apply. The transport of scientists or research equipment is not in itself sufficient for a flight to be exempt. 2.5.2.    Flights performed exclusively for the purpose of checking, testing or certifying aircraft or equipment whether airborne or ground-based 28. Flights with the CRCO exemption code ‘N’ and flights identified with STS/FLTCK in field 18 of the flight plan are presumed to be exempted under subparagraph (g). 2.6.    Exemption under subparagraph (i) (public service obligation flights) 29. The exemption of public service obligation (PSO) flights within outermost regions shall be interpreted as applying to the regions listed in Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty and comprises exclusively PSO flights within one outermost region and flights between two outermost regions. 2.7.    Exemption under subparagraph (j) ( de minimis rule) 30. All commercial air transport operators must hold an air operator’s certificate (AOC) under Part I of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention. Operators without such a certificate are not ‘commercial air transport operators’ 31. For the application of the de minimis rule, the characteristic of being commercial is linked to the operator and not to the flights in question. That means in particular that the flights provided by a commercial operator shall be taken into account for deciding whether that operator falls above or below the exemption thresholds even if those flights are not provided for remuneration. 32. Only flights which depart from or arrive in an aerodrome situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies shall be taken into account for deciding whether the aircraft operator falls above or below the exemption thresholds of the de minimis rule. Flights exempted under subparagraphs (a)-(j) shall not be taken into account for the same purposes. 33. Flights performed by a commercial aircraft operator operating fewer than 243 flights per period for three consecutive four-month periods are exempted. The four-month periods are: January to April; May to August; September to December. The local time of departure of the flight determines in which four-month period that flight shall be taken into account for deciding whether the aircraft operator falls above or below the exemption thresholds of the de minimis rule. 34. A commercial operator operating 243 flights per period or more is included in the Community scheme for the whole calendar year in which the threshold of 243 flights is reached or exceeded. 35. A commercial operator operating flights with total annual emissions equal or higher than 10 000 tonnes per year is included in the Community scheme for the calendar year in which the threshold of 10 000 tonnes is reached or exceeded.

Other acts of the same type
2010/660/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2009/023 PT/Qimonda from Portugal)2010/661/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2009/031 DK/Linak from Denmark)2010/662/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/001 DK/Nordjylland from Denmark)2010/663/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/002 ES/Cataluña automoción)2010/664/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/003 ES/Galicia Textiles from Spain)2010/665/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/011 NL/NXP Semiconductors from the Netherlands)Decision No 938/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 providing macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova2010/625/EU: Commission Decision of 19 October 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data in Andorra (notified under document C(2010) 7084) Text with EEA relevance2010/655/EU: Council Decision of 19 October 2010 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Additional Protocol to the Cooperation Agreement for the Protection of the Coasts and Waters of the North-East Atlantic against PollutionCouncil Decision 2010/619/CFSP of 15 October 2010 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVOCouncil Implementing Decision of 15 October 2010 authorising the Italian Republic to continue to apply a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax2010/624/EU: Decision of the European Central Bank of 14 October 2010 concerning the administration of the borrowing and lending operations concluded by the Union under the European financial stabilisation mechanism (ECB/2010/17)

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next