My bookmarksSign up free
Source

2011/418/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 14 July 2011 amending Decision 2005/7/EC authorising a method for grading pig carcasses in Cyprus (notified under document C(2011) 4996)

2011/418/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 14 July 2011 amending Decision 2005/7/EC authorising a method for grading pig carcasses in Cyprus (notified under document C(2011) 4996)

Decision 2005/7/EC · Decision · 4 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

Open ↗

Decision 2005/7/EC is amended as follows: 1. Article 1 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 1 The use of the following methods is authorised for grading pig carcasses pursuant to point 1 of Section B.IV of Annex V to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007  ( *1 ) in Cyprus: — the “Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part I of the Annex, — the “Ultra FOM 300” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part II of the Annex. As regards the apparatus “Ultra FOM 300”, referred to in the second indent of the first subparagraph, after the end of the measurement procedure it must be possible to verify on the carcass that the apparatus measured the values of measurements X 1 and X 2 on the site provided for in the Annex, Part II, point 3. The corresponding marking of the measurement site must be made at the same time as the measurement procedure. ( *1 )    OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1 .’;" 2. the Annex is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX ‘ANNEX METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASSES IN CYPRUS PART I Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4) 1. The rules provided for in this Part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)”. 2. The apparatus shall be equipped with a probe of 5,95 millimetres diameter (and of 6,3 millimetres at the blade of the top of the probe) containing a photodiode (Siemens LED of the type LYU 260-EO) and photodetector of the type 58 MR and having an operating distance of between 0 and 120 millimetres. The results of the measurements shall be converted into estimated lean meat content by means of the HGP 4 itself or a computer linked to it. 3. The lean meat content of the carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula: where: Ŷ = the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass, X 1 = the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 6 centimetres off the midline of the split carcass, between the third and fourth last ribs, X 2 = the thickness of the dorsal muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as X 1 . This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 55 and 120 kilograms. PART II Ultra FOM 300 1. The rules provided for in this Part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “Ultra FOM 300”. 2. The apparatus shall be equipped with a 3,5 MHz ultrasound probe, 5 centimetres in length, featuring 64 ultrasound transducers. The ultrasound signal shall be digitalised; stored and processed by a microprocessor (type SHARC ADSP-21060L). The results of the measurements shall be converted into estimated lean meat content by the Ultra FOM 300 apparatus itself. 3. The lean meat content of carcasses shall be calculated according to the following formula: where: Ŷ = the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass, X 1 = the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 6 centimetres off the midline of the split carcass, between the third and fourth last ribs, X 2 = the thickness of the dorsal muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as X 1 . This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 55 and 120 kilograms.’

Other acts of the same type
Decision No P1 of 12 June 2009 on the interpretation of Articles 50(4), 58 and 87(5) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the award of invalidity, old-age and survivors’ benefits (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No S1 of 12 June 2009 concerning the European Health Insurance Card (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No S2 of 12 June 2009 concerning the technical specifications of the European Health Insurance Card (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No S3 of 12 June 2009 defining the benefits covered by Articles 19(1) and 27(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 25(A)(3) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland AgreementDecision No U1 of 12 June 2009 concerning Article 54(3) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to increases in unemployment benefit for dependent members of the family (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No U2 of 12 June 2009 concerning the scope of Article 65(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right to unemployment benefits of wholly unemployed persons other than frontier workers who were resident in the territory of a Member State other than the competent Member State during their last period of employment or self-employment (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No U3 of 12 June 2009 concerning the scope of the concept of partial unemployment applicable to the unemployed persons referred to in Article 65(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No S4 of 2 October 2009 concerning refund procedures for the implementation of Articles 35 and 41 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)Decision No S5 of 2 October 2009 on interpretation of the concept of benefits in kind as defined in Article 1(va) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the event of sickness or maternity pursuant to Articles 17, 19, 20, 22, 24(1), 25, 26, 27(1, 3, 4 and 5), 28, 34 and 36(1 and 2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and on calculation of the amounts to be refunded under Articles 62, 63 and 64 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EC/Switzerland Agreement)2009/452/EC: Commission Decision of 11 June 2009 terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of sodium metal originating in the United States of America2009/453/EC: Commission Decision of 11 June 2009 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning on imports of sodium metal originating in the United States of America2009/454/EC: Commission Decision of 11 June 2009 amending Decision 2008/938/EC on the list of the beneficiary countries which qualify for the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance, provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 (notified under document number C(2009) 4383)

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next