Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1056 of 30 June 2015 concerning the inconsistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (notified under document C(2015) 4407) (Text with EEA relevance)
Data as of 2026-07-04 Β· Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Β· Read the official text β
The performance targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the FABEC performance plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, as incorporated into the Agreement, listed in the Annex, are inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.
Switzerland, as regards FABEC, should take the necessary measures to ensure that its national supervisory authority proposes revised performance targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency, in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.
The performance targets in the key performance area of capacity submitted by Switzerland as regards FABEC should be revised downwards. As a minimum, those targets should be in accordance with the respective FAB reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan. The revision of those performance targets should take account of the remediation or mitigation measures designed to ensure that the relevant FAB reference values are respected, specified in the Network Operations Plan.
The performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency expressed in en route determined unit costs submitted by Switzerland as regards FABEC should be revised downwards to a level that is in line with the reduction of the average en route determined unit costs on Union level over the second reference period and over the combined period of the first and the second reference period. That downwards revision should include a reduction in en route determined costs over the second reference period and a revision of the forecasted traffic expressed in service units.
This Decision is addressed to the Swiss Confederation.
ANNEX Performance targets in the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) NoΒ 549/2004 found to be inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight MEMBER STATE FAB FAB TARGET EN ROUTE CAPACITY 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (Belgium/Lux) FAB EC 0,48 0,49 0,48 0,47 Consistent (0,43) (France) (Germany) (The Netherlands) Switzerland KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY Legend: Key Item Units (A) Total en route Determined Costs (in nominal terms and in national currency) (B) Inflation rate (%) (C) Inflation index (100Β = 2009) (D) Total en route Determined Costs (in real 2009 prices and in national currency) (E) Total en route Services Units (TSUs) (F) En route Determined Unit Cost (DUC) (in real 2009 prices and in national currency) FAB EC Charging Zone: Switzerland β Currency: CHF Β 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 155Β 368Β 493 156Β 819Β 377 158Β 799Β 337 159Β 144Β 368 160Β 894Β 397 (B) 0,5 % 1,0 % 1,0 % 1,0 % 1,0 % (C) 100,8 101,8 102,8 103,9 104,9 (D) 154Β 139Β 443 154Β 038Β 465 154Β 438Β 925 153Β 242Β 061 153Β 393Β 253 (E) 1Β 418Β 755 1Β 428Β 660 1Β 440Β 060 1Β 454Β 424 1Β 470Β 383 (F) 108,64 107,82 107,24 105,36 104,32
Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), Β© European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.