Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1056 of 30 June 2015 concerning the inconsistency of certain targets included in the national or functional airspace block plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (notified under document C(2015) 4407) (Text with EEA relevance)

• CELEX: Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1056
• Articles: 6

Article 1

The performance targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the FABEC performance plan submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, as incorporated into the Agreement, listed in the Annex, are inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.

Article 2

Switzerland, as regards FABEC, should take the necessary measures to ensure that its national supervisory authority proposes revised performance targets concerning the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency, in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.

Article 3

The performance targets in the key performance area of capacity submitted by Switzerland as regards FABEC should be revised downwards. As a minimum, those targets should be in accordance with the respective FAB reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan. The revision of those performance targets should take account of the remediation or mitigation measures designed to ensure that the relevant FAB reference values are respected, specified in the Network Operations Plan.

Article 4

The performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency expressed in en route determined unit costs submitted by Switzerland as regards FABEC should be revised downwards to a level that is in line with the reduction of the average en route determined unit costs on Union level over the second reference period and over the combined period of the first and the second reference period. That downwards revision should include a reduction in en route determined costs over the second reference period and a revision of the forecasted traffic expressed in service units.

Article 5

This Decision is addressed to the Swiss Confederation.

Schedules & Appendices

ANNEX

ANNEX

Performance targets in the key performance areas of capacity and cost-efficiency included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Switzerland pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 found to be inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight

MEMBER STATE

FAB

FAB TARGET EN ROUTE CAPACITY

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

(Belgium/Lux)

FAB EC

0,48

0,49

0,48

0,47

Consistent (0,43)

(France)

(Germany)

(The Netherlands)

Switzerland

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Legend:

Key

Item

Units

(A)

Total en route Determined Costs

(in nominal terms and in national currency)

(B)

Inflation rate

(%)

(C)

Inflation index

(100 = 2009)

(D)

Total en route Determined Costs

(in real 2009 prices and in national currency)

(E)

Total en route Services Units

(TSUs)

(F)

En route Determined Unit Cost (DUC)

(in real 2009 prices and in national currency)

FAB EC

Charging Zone: Switzerland — Currency: CHF

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

(A)

155 368 493

156 819 377

158 799 337

159 144 368

160 894 397

(B)

0,5 %

1,0 %

1,0 %

1,0 %

1,0 %

(C)

100,8

101,8

102,8

103,9

104,9

(D)

154 139 443

154 038 465

154 438 925

153 242 061

153 393 253

(E)

1 418 755

1 428 660

1 440 060

1 454 424

1 470 383

(F)

108,64

107,82

107,24

105,36

104,32