My bookmarksSign up free
Source

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1799 of 7 October 2016 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the mapping of credit assessments of external credit assessment institutions for credit risk in accordance with Articles 136(1) and 136(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1799 of 7 October 2016 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the mapping of credit assessments of external credit assessment institutions for credit risk in accordance with Articles 136(1) and 136(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance)

Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1799 · Regulation · 20 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

TITLE I — QUANTITATIVE FACTORS, QUALITATIVE FACTORS AND BENCHMARK
CHAPTER 1 — Quantitative factors

Quantitative factors of the mapping of a rating category

Article 1

Open ↗

The quantitative factors referred to in point (a) of Article 136(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall be the short run and long run default rates associated with items assigned the same rating category, as set out in Articles 2 to 6.

Items used for the calculation of the quantitative factors

Article 2

Open ↗

The calculation of the default rates referred to in Article 1 for each rating category shall be performed based solely on items assigned the same rating category by the external credit assessment institution (ECAI) for which the mapping is being performed, where the items meet all of the following requirements: (a) they belong to the ‘corporate ratings’ referred to in point (a) of Article 3 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2, and they are assigned on an issuer basis; (b) they are assigned either of the following: (i) a solicited credit rating; (ii) an unsolicited credit rating that meets the requirements of Article 138 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.

Section 1 — Calculation of the quantitative factors of a rating category where a sufficient number of credit ratings is available

Determination of whether a sufficient number of credit ratings is available

Article 3

Open ↗

1.   For the purpose of the short run default rate calculation, the number of items assigned the same rating category by the ECAI for which the mapping is being performed shall be deemed sufficiently numerous, where the items meet all of the following requirements: (a) they are sufficient with respect to the perceived risk profile of the rating category, considering as an indicator, the number of items representing the inverse of the long run default rate benchmark of the rating category, as referred to in point (a) of Article 14; (b) they are representative of the most recent pool of items assigned the same rating category. 2.   For the purpose of the long run default rate calculation, the number of items assigned the same rating category by the ECAI for which the mapping is being performed shall be deemed sufficiently numerous where at minimum the most recent 10 short run default rates as referred to in paragraph 1 are available.

Short run default rates of a rating category where a sufficient number of credit ratings is available

Article 4

Open ↗

1.   Where a sufficient number of credit ratings is available according to Article 3(1), the short run default rates referred to in Article 1 shall be calculated in the manner described in paragraphs 2 to 5. 2.   The short run default rates of a rating category shall be calculated over a 3-year time horizon as a ratio where: (a) the denominator represents the number of items assigned the same rating category present at the beginning of the time horizon; (b) the numerator represents the number of items referred to in point (a) that have defaulted prior to the end of the time horizon. 3.   Items withdrawn prior to the end of the time horizon and not defaulted shall only contribute to the denominator of the short run default rates referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2 with a weight equal to 50 %. Any item for which there is evidence that it has been withdrawn prior to the occurrence of a default shall be considered to be a defaulted item. 4.   Items shall be considered to be defaulted items to be included in the numerator specified in point (b) of paragraph 2 where any of the following types of event has occurred: (a) a bankruptcy filing or legal receivership that will likely cause a miss or delay in future contractually required debt service payments; (b) a missed or delayed disbursement of a contractually required interest or principal payment, unless payments are made within a contractually allowed grace period; (c) a distressed exchange if the offer implies the investor will receive less value than the promise of the original securities; (d) the rated entity is under a significant form of regulatory supervision owing to its financial condition. 5.   The short run default rates shall be calculated for each available pool of items assigned the same rating category on semi-annual periods, which are based on 1 January and 1 July of each year.

Long run default rate of a rating category where a sufficient number of credit ratings is available

Article 5

Open ↗

1.   Where a sufficient number of credit ratings is available in accordance with Article 3, the long run default rate referred to in Article 1 shall be calculated according to paragraphs 2 to 4. 2.   The long run default rate shall be calculated as the weighted average of at least the most recent 20 short run default rates calculated according to Article 4(1). If the available short run default rates span a longer period and they are relevant, the short run default rates for that longer period shall be used. Where less than 20 short run default rates calculated according to Article 4(1) are available the remaining short run default rates shall be estimated to span the 20 short run default rates. 3.   For the purpose of producing the weighted average referred to in paragraph 2, the short run default rates calculated according to Article 4 shall include the most recent recessionary period. This recessionary period shall span a semester or more of the negative growth rates of the Gross Domestic Products in the main geographical areas of reference of the rated items. 4.   For the purpose of producing the weighted average referred to in paragraph 2, the following shall apply: (a) the short run default rates calculated according to Article 4(1) shall be weighted based on the number of items specified in point (a) of Article 4(2); (b) the estimated short run default rates shall be weighted based on estimates of the number of items assigned the same rating category present at the beginning of the time horizon. The weights shall ensure an adequate representation of recessionary and non-recessionary years in a full economic cycle.

Section 2 — Calculation of the quantitative factors of a rating category where a sufficient number of credit ratings is not available

Items used and long run default rate of a rating category where a sufficient number of credit ratings is not available

Article 6

Open ↗

Where a sufficient number of credit ratings as referred to in Article 3 is not available, the calculation of the long run default rate specified in Article 1 shall be performed according to both the following: (a) it shall be based on the estimate provided by the ECAI of the long run default rate associated with all items assigned the same rating category, pursuant to point (a) of Article 136(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; (b) the estimate referred to in point (a) shall be complemented with the number of defaulted and non-defaulted items assigned the rating category by the ECAI for which the mapping is being performed.

CHAPTER 2 — Qualitative factors

Qualitative factors of the mapping of a rating category

Article 7

Open ↗

The qualitative factors referred to in point (b) of Article 136(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall be: (a) the definition of default considered by the ECAI, as referred to in Article 8; (b) the time horizon of a rating category considered by the ECAI, as referred to in Article 9; (c) the meaning of a rating category and its relative position within the rating scale established by the ECAI, as referred to in Article 10; (d) the creditworthiness of the items assigned the same rating category, as referred to in Article 11; (e) the estimate provided by the ECAI of the long run default rate associated with all items assigned the same rating category, pursuant to point (a) of Article 136(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as set out in Article 12; (f) the relationship established by the ECAI (‘internal mapping’), where available, between, on the one hand, the rating category which is being mapped, and, on the other hand, other rating categories produced by the same ECAI, where a mapping for the latter categories has already been set out according to this Regulation, as referred to in Article 13; (g) any other relevant information that can describe the degree of risk expressed by a rating category.

Definition of default used by the ECAI

Article 8

Open ↗

The type of events considered by the ECAI for the purposes of establishing whether an item is in default situation shall be compared to those specified in Article 4(4) by using all available information. Where the comparison indicates that not all such types of default events have been considered by the ECAI, the quantitative factors referred to in Article 1 shall be adjusted accordingly.

Time horizon of a rating category

Article 9

Open ↗

The time horizon considered by the ECAI for assigning a rating category shall provide a relevant indication of whether the level of risk of that rating category is sustainable over the time horizon specified in Article 4(2).

Meaning and relative position of a rating category

Article 10

Open ↗

1.   The meaning of a rating category established by the ECAI shall be set according to the characteristics of the capacity of financial commitments as reflected in the items assigned such rating category being honoured, and more in particular by its degree of sensitivity to the economic environment and its degree of proximity to the default situation. 2.   The meaning of a rating category shall be compared to the one established for each credit quality step, as set out in Article 15. 3.   The meaning of a rating category shall be considered in combination with its relative position within the rating scale established by the ECAI.

Creditworthiness of items assigned the same rating category

Article 11

Open ↗

1.   The creditworthiness of items assigned the same rating category shall be determined by considering at least their size and the degree of sector and geographical diversification of their business activity. 2.   Different measures of creditworthiness assigned to items of the same rating category may be used, to the extent appropriate, to complement the information provided by the quantitative factors referred to in Article 1 where they are reliable and relevant for the mapping.

Estimate provided by the ECAI of the long run default rate associated with all items assigned the same rating category

Article 12

Open ↗

The estimate provided by the ECAI of the long run default rate associated with all items assigned the same rating category shall be taken into account for the purpose of the mapping as long as it has been adequately justified.

Internal mapping of a rating category established by the ECAI

Article 13

Open ↗

The corresponding credit quality step of other rating categories produced by the same ECAI for which an internal mapping exists according to point (f) of Article 7 shall be used as a relevant indication of the level of risk of the rating category which is being mapped.

CHAPTER 3 — Benchmark and related references

Benchmark

Article 14

Open ↗

The benchmark referred to in point (c) of Article 136(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, shall be distinguished in: (a) a long-run default rate benchmark for each credit quality step as set out in Table 1 of Annex I; (b) a short-run default rate benchmark for each credit quality step as set out in Table 2 of Annex I.

Reference meaning of the rating category per credit quality step

Article 15

Open ↗

The reference meaning of a rating category that corresponds to each credit quality step is set out in Annex II.

TITLE II — MAPPING TABLES

Mapping tables

Article 16

Open ↗

The correspondence of the rating categories of each ECAI with the credit quality steps set out in Section 2 of Chapter 2 of Title II of Part Three of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 is that set out in Annex III.

TITLE III — FINAL PROVISION

Entry into force

Article 17

Open ↗

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .

Supplementary provisions

ANNEX ISupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX I Benchmarks for the purposes of Article 14 Table 1 Long-run benchmark (3-year time horizon) Credit Quality Step Long run benchmark Mid value Lower bound Upper bound 1 0,10 % 0,00 % 0,16 % 2 0,25 % 0,17 % 0,54 % 3 1,00 % 0,55 % 2,39 % 4 7,50 % 2,40 % 10,99 % 5 20,00 % 11,00 % 26,49 % 6 34,00 % 26,50 % 100,00 % Table 2 Short run benchmarks (3-year time horizon) Credit Quality Step Short run benchmarks Monitoring level Trigger level 1 0,80 % 1,20 % 2 1,00 % 1,30 % 3 2,40 % 3,00 % 4 11,00 % 12,40 % 5 28,60 % 35,00 % 6 not applicable not applicable

ANNEX IISupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX II Reference meaning of the rating category per credit quality step for the purposes of Article 15 Credit Quality Step Meaning of the rating category 1 The rated entity has extremely/very strong capacity to meet its financial commitments and is subject to minimal/very low credit risk. 2 The rated entity has strong capacity to meet its financial commitments and is subject to low credit risk but is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than rated entities in CQS 1. 3 The rated entity has adequate capacity to meet its financial commitments and is subject to moderate credit risk. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the rated entity to meet its financial commitments. 4 The rated entity has the capacity to meet its financial commitments but is subject to substantial credit risk. It faces major ongoing uncertainties and exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, which could lead to the rated entity's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments. 5 The rated entity has the capacity to meet its financial commitments but is subject to high credit risk. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the rated entity's capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments. 6 The rated entity is currently vulnerable or highly vulnerable and is subject to very high credit risk, including in or very near to default. It is dependent upon favourable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet its financial commitments.

ANNEX IIISupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX III Mapping tables for the purposes of Article 16 Credit quality step 1 2 3 4 5 6 AM Best Europe-Rating Services Ltd Long-term issuer credit ratings scale aaa, aa+, aa, aa- a+, a, a- bbb+, bbb, bbb- bb+, bb, bb- b+, b, b- ccc+, ccc, ccc-, cc, c, rs Long-term debt ratings scale aaa, aa+, aa, aa- a+, a, a- bbb+, bbb, bbb- bb+, bb, bb- b+, b, b- ccc+, ccc, ccc-, cc, c, d Financial strength ratings scale A++, A+ A, A- B++, B+ B, B- C++, C+ C, C-, D, E, F, S Short-term ratings scale AMB-1+ AMB-1- AMB-2, AMB-3 AMB- 4     ARC Ratings S.A. Medium and long-term issuers rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Medium and long-term issues rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Short-term issuers rating scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Short-term issues rating scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     ASSEKURATA Assekuranz Rating-Agentur GmbH Long-term credit rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC/C, D Short-term corporate rating scale A++ A   B, C, D     Axesor SA Global rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D, E BCRA — Credit Rating Agency AD Bank long-term ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B C, D Insurance long-term ratings scale iAAA, iAA iA iBBB iBB iB iC, iD Corporate long-term ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Municipality long-term ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Issue long-term ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Bank short-term ratings scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Corporate short-term ratings scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Municipality short-term ratings scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Issue short-term rating scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Banque de France Global long-term issuer credit ratings scale 3++ 3+, 3 4+ 4, 5+ 5, 6 7, 8, 9, P Capital Intelligence Ltd International long-term issuer rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B C, RS, SD, D International long-term issue rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D International short-term issuer rating scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     International short-term issue rating scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Cerved Rating Agency S.p.A. Corporate long-term rating scale A1.1, A1.2, A1.3 A2.1, A2.2, A3.1 B1.1, B1.2 B2.1, B2.2 C1.1 C1.2, C2.1 Creditreform Ratings AG Long-term rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B C, D CRIF S.p.A. Global long-term rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, D1, D2 Dagong Europe Credit Rating Long-term credit rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Short-term credit rating scale A-1   A-2, A-3 B, C, D     DBRS Ratings Limited Long-term obligations rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Commercial paper and short-term debt rating scale R-1 H, R-1 M R-1 L R-2, R-3 R-4, R-5, D     Claims paying ability rating scale IC-1 IC-2 IC-3 IC-4 IC-5 D European Rating Agency, a.s. Long-term rating scale   AAA, AA, A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Short-term rating scale   S1 S2 S3, S4, NS     EuroRating Sp. z o.o. Global long-term rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Euler Hermes Rating GmbH Global long-term rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, SD, D FERI EuroRating Services AG FERI EuroRating rating scale AAA, AA A   BBB, BB B CCC, CC, D Fitch Ratings Long-term issuer credit ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, RD, D Corporate finance obligations — Long-term ratings scale AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C Long-term international IFS ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C Short-term rating scale F1+ F1 F2, F3 B, C, RD, D     Short-term IFS ratings scale F1+ F1 F2, F3 B, C     GBB-Rating Gesellschaft für Bonitätsbeurteilung GmbH Global long-term rating scale AAA, AA   A, BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D ICAP Group S.A Global long-term rating scale   AA, A BB, B C, D E, F G, H Japan Credit Rating Agency Ltd Long-term issuer ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, LD, D Long-term issue ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Short-term issuer ratings scale J-1+ J-1 J-2 J-3, NJ, LD, D     Short-term issue credit ratings scale J-1+ J-1 J-2 J-3, NJ, D     Kroll Bond Rating Agency Long-term credit rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Short-term credit rating scale K1+ K1 K2, K3 B, C, D     Moody's Investors Service Global long-term rating scale Aaa, Aa A Baa Ba B Caa, Ca, C Bond fund rating scale Aaa-bf, Aa-bf A-bf Baa-bf Ba-bf B-bf Caa-bf, Ca-bf, C-bf Global short-term rating scale P-1 P-2 P-3 NP     Standard & Poor's Ratings Services Long-term issuer credit ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, R, SD/D Long-term issue credit ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D Insurer financial strength ratings scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, SD/D, R Fund credit quality ratings scale AAAf, AAf Af BBBf BBf Bf CCCf Mid Market Evaluation ratings scale   MM1 MM2 MM3, MM4 MM5, MM6 MM7, MM8, MMD Short-term issuer credit ratings scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, R, SD/D     Short-term issue credit ratings scale A-1+ A-1 A-2, A-3 B, C, D     Scope Ratings AG Global long-term rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC,C, D Global short-term rating scale S-1+ S-1 S-2 S-3, S-4     Spread Research International long-term rating scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd Sovereign rating band scale AAA, AA A BBB BB B CCC, CC, C, D

Other acts of the same type
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1450 of 3 September 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the approval periods of the active substances acrinathrin and prochloraz (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1451 of 3 September 2021 concerning the non-approval of dimethyl sulphide as a basic substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1452 of 3 September 2021 renewing the approval of the active substance potassium hydrogen carbonate as a low-risk substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1434 of 2 September 2021 terminating a review of Council Implementing Regulations (EU) No 443/2011 and (EU) No 444/2011 extending the definitive countervailing and anti-dumping duty on imports of biodiesel consigned from CanadaCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1431 of 1 September 2021 concerning the authorisation of muramidase produced by Trichoderma reesei DSM 32338 as a feed additive for weaned piglets (holder of the authorisation DSM Nutritional Products Ltd, represented in the Union by DSM Nutritional Products Sp. z o.o.) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1432 of 1 September 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain pre- and post-stressing wires and wire strands of non-alloy steel (PSC wires and strands) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1457 of 1 September 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Szegedi tükörponty’ (PGI))Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1424 of 31 August 2021 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of a preparation of Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 998/2010 (holder of authorisation Lactosan GmbH & Co KG) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1425 of 31 August 2021 concerning the authorisation of manganese chelate of lysine and glutamic acid as feed additive for all animal species (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1426 of 31 August 2021 concerning the authorisation of serine protease produced by Bacillus licheniformis DSM 19670 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation: DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., represented in the Union by DSM Nutritional Products Sp. z o.o.) (Text with EEA relevance)Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1928 of 31 August 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/760 as regards the management and quantities of certain tariff quotas for Argentina and correcting that Regulation as regards its transitional provisionsCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1420 of 30 August 2021 operating deductions from fishing quotas available for certain stocks in 2021 on account of overfishing in the previous years

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next