My bookmarksSign up free

Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1344 of 9 August 2021 establishing criteria to define the period of time for which persons posing a threat to security may be banned from the Commission’s premises

Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1344 of 9 August 2021 establishing criteria to define the period of time for which persons posing a threat to security may be banned from the Commission’s premises

Decision (EU) 2021/1344 · Decision · 5 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Subject matter and scope

Article 1

1.   This Decision sets out criteria to define the period of time for which persons posing a threat to security may be banned from the Commission’s premises pursuant to Article 12(1), point (b) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/443. 2.   This Decision shall apply to all Commission departments and in all Commission premises. Commission staff working in Union Delegations shall be subject to the security rules for the European External Action Service  ( 4 ) . 3.   This Decision shall not apply to suspension proceedings pursuant to Article 23 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community  ( 5 ) .

Scope of the ban

Article 2

1.   The ban referred to in Article 1(1) may apply to one, several or all Commission premises. 2.   Where the Commission shares premises with other EU institutions, agencies and bodies, the Commission shall communicate the decision to ban access to Commission parts of the premises to the latter.

Period of ban

Article 3

1.   The period of the ban referred to in Article 1(1) shall be based on the estimated duration, likelihood and seriousness of the threat to security. 2.   The criteria for assessing the seriousness of the threat to security shall include: (a) the degree of harm to which it could lead, as regards the life, bodily integrity, well-being or health of persons, and potential damage to assets and information; (b) whether the threat is linked to commitment of a criminal offence; (c) whether the threat is based on negligence, gross negligence or intent; (d) whether the behaviour of the person posing the threat is violent, aggressive or repetitive; (e) the extent of potential financial loss to the Commission; (f) the extent of potential reputational damage to the Commission. 3.   Where the duration of the threat cannot be estimated with sufficient certainty and the threat is very serious, the person posing the threat may be banned until further notice. That applies, in particular, where the threat has one of the following characteristics: (a) it consists of involvement in terrorist or espionage activities and networks; (b) it could lead to loss of life, serious injury or harm, or significant damage to property, compromise sensitive or classified information, or disrupt the Commission’s IT systems or essential operational capacities; (c) it consists of violent, aggressive or repetitive behaviour, having the effect of seriously disrupting the functioning of Commission services.

Review of bans

Article 4

The Commission shall review any decision taken pursuant to Article 12(1), point (b) of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/443 on request of the person concerned, provided the latter demonstrates new substantial elements that allow a re-examination of the ban. The Commission shall base its review on the criteria that led to the initial ban.

Article 5

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .

Other acts of the same type
Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/490 of 26 February 2026 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in UkraineCouncil Decision (EU) 2026/499 of 26 February 2026 renewing the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other partCommission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/401 of 24 February 2026 laying down rules for the application of Council Directive 92/43/EEC as regards the list of sites of Community importance and repealing Implementing Decisions (EU) 2024/428, (EU) 2025/238, (EU) 2025/239, (EU) 2025/240, (EU) 2025/242, (EU) 2025/244, (EU) 2025/251, (EU) 2025/256 and (EU) 2025/257 (notified under document C(2026) 992)Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/406 of 24 February 2026 recognising that the report submitted by the United Kingdom under Article 31(3) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council contains accurate data for the purposes of measuring the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of winter wheat, oilseed rape and sugar beet in that countryCommission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/458 of 24 February 2026 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2207 concerning certain emergency measures relating to sheep pox and goat pox in Greece (notified under number C(2026) 1319)Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/461 of 24 February 2026 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/2256 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of Newcastle disease in Poland (notified under document C(2026) 1317)Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/462 of 24 February 2026 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/1160 concerning certain emergency measures relating to sheep pox and goat pox in Bulgaria (notified under document C(2026) 1318)Council Decision (EU) 2026/487 of 24 February 2026 appointing an alternate member, proposed by Romania, of the Committee of the RegionsCouncil Decision (EU) 2026/494 of 24 February 2026 appointing two members and four alternate members, proposed by the Republic of Estonia, of the Committee of the RegionsCouncil Implementing Decision of 23 February 2026 on the appointment of the fifth full-time member of the Executive Board of the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of TerrorismCommission Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/390 of 23 February 2026 concerning the extension of the action taken by the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management permitting the making available on the market and use of the biocidal product Vectobac WG in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2026) 980)Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/432 of 23 February 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/1484 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Russia

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next