SECTION 1 — Joint clinical assessments
Health technologies subject to joint clinical assessments
1. The following health technologies shall be subject to joint clinical assessments:
(a)
medicinal products as referred to in Article 3(1) and Article 3(2), point (a), of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, for which the application for a marketing authorisation is submitted in accordance with that Regulation after the relevant dates set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, and for which that application is in compliance with Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC;
(b)
medicinal products authorised in the Union for which a joint clinical assessment report has been published, in cases where an authorisation is granted pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/83/EC for a variation to an existing marketing authorisation which corresponds to a new therapeutic indication;
(c)
medical devices classified as class IIb or III pursuant to Article 51 of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 for which the relevant expert panels have provided a scientific opinion in the framework of the clinical evaluation consultation procedure pursuant to Article 54 of that Regulation, and subject to selection pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Article;
(d)
in vitro diagnostic medical devices classified as class D pursuant to Article 47 of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 for which the relevant expert panels have provided their views in the framework of the procedure pursuant to Article 48(6) of that Regulation, and subject to selection pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Article.
2. The dates referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), shall be as follows:
(a)
12 January 2025, for medicinal products with new active substances for which the applicant declares in its application for authorisation submitted to the European Medicines Agency that it contains a new active substance for which the therapeutic indication is the treatment of cancer and medicinal products which are regulated as advanced therapy medicinal products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 15 ) ;
(b)
13 January 2028, for medicinal products which are designated as orphan medicinal products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 16 ) ;
(c)
13 January 2030, for medicinal products referred to in paragraph 1 other than those referred to in points (a) and (b) of this paragraph.
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, the Commission, upon a recommendation from the Coordination Group, shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act establishing that medicinal products referred to in that paragraph shall be subject to joint clinical assessment at a date earlier than the dates set out in that paragraph, provided that the medicinal product, in particular according to Article 22, has the potential to address an unmet medical need or a public health emergency or has a significant impact on healthcare systems.
4. After 12 January 2025, the Commission, after seeking a recommendation from the Coordination Group, shall adopt a decision, by means of an implementing act and at least every two years, selecting the medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices referred to in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), for joint clinical assessment based on one or more of the following criteria:
(a)
unmet medical needs;
(b)
first in class;
(c)
potential impact on patients, public health or healthcare systems;
(d)
incorporation of software using artificial intelligence, machine learning technologies or algorithms;
(e)
significant cross-border dimension;
(f)
major Union-wide added value.
5. The implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 33(2).
Initiation of joint clinical assessments
1. The Coordination Group shall carry out joint clinical assessments on health technologies on the basis of its annual work programme.
2. The Coordination Group shall initiate joint clinical assessments of health technologies by designating the subgroup on joint clinical assessments to oversee the conduct of the joint clinical assessment on behalf of the Coordination Group.
3. The joint clinical assessment shall be conducted in accordance with the procedure established by the Coordination Group according to the requirements set out in this Article, in Article 3(7), point (e), and in Articles 4, 9, 10, 11 and 12, as well as the requirements to be established pursuant to Articles 15, 25 and 26.
4. The designated subgroup shall appoint, from among its members, an assessor and a co-assessor from different Member States to conduct the joint clinical assessment. The appointments shall take into account the scientific expertise necessary for the assessment. If the health technology has been the subject of a joint scientific consultation in accordance with Articles 16 to 21, the assessor and the co-assessor shall be different from those appointed pursuant to Article 18(3) for the preparation of the joint scientific consultation outcome document.
5. Notwithstanding paragraph 4, where, in exceptional circumstances, the necessary specific expertise is otherwise not available, the same assessor or co-assessor, or both, involved in the joint scientific consultation may be appointed to conduct the joint clinical assessment. Such an appointment shall be justified and subject to approval by the Coordination Group and shall be documented in the joint clinical assessment report.
6. The designated subgroup shall initiate a scoping process in which it identifies the relevant parameters for the assessment scope. The assessment scope shall be inclusive and reflect Member States’ needs in terms of parameters and of the information, data, analysis and other evidence to be submitted by the health technology developer. The assessment scope shall include in particular all relevant parameters for the assessment in terms of:
(a)
the patient population;
(b)
the intervention or interventions;
(c)
the comparator or comparators;
(d)
the health outcomes.
The scoping process shall also take into account information provided by the health technology developer and input received from patients, clinical experts and other relevant experts.
7. The Coordination Group shall inform the Commission of the assessment scope of the joint clinical assessment.
Joint clinical assessment reports and the dossier of the health technology developer
1. A joint clinical assessment shall result in a joint clinical assessment report that shall be accompanied by a summary report. Those reports shall not contain any value judgement or conclusions on the overall clinical added value of the assessed health technology and shall be limited to a description of the scientific analysis:
(a)
of the relative effects of the health technology as assessed on the health outcomes against the chosen parameters which are based on the assessment scope as set out pursuant to Article 8(6);
(b)
of the degree of certainty of the relative effects, taking into account the strengths and limitations of the available evidence.
2. The reports referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on a dossier that contains complete and up-to-date information, data, analyses and other evidence submitted by the health technology developer to assess the parameters included in the assessment scope.
3. The dossier shall meet the following requirements:
(a)
the submitted evidence is complete with regard to the available studies and data that could inform the assessment;
(b)
the data has been analysed using appropriate methods to answer all research questions of the assessment;
(c)
the presentation of the data is well structured and transparent, thereby allowing for an appropriate assessment within the limited timeframes available;
(d)
it includes the underlying documentation in respect of the submitted information, thereby allowing the assessor and co-assessor to verify the accuracy of that information.
4. The dossier for medicinal products shall include the information set out in Annex I. The dossier for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices shall include the information set out in Annex II.
5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 32, to amend Annex I as regards the information required in the dossier for medicinal products, and to amend Annex II as regards the information required in the dossier for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
Obligations of health technology developers and consequences of non-compliance
1. The Commission shall inform the health technology developer of the assessment scope and request the submission of the dossier (first request). That request shall include the deadline for submission as well as the dossier template pursuant to Article 26(1), point (a), and refer to the requirements for the dossier in accordance with Article 9(2), (3) and (4). For medicinal products, the deadline for submission shall be at the latest 45 days prior to the envisaged date of the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004.
2. The health technology developer shall submit the dossier to the Commission in accordance with the submission request made pursuant to paragraph 1.
3. The health technology developer shall not submit any information, data, analyses or other evidence at the national level that has been already submitted at Union level. That requirement shall not affect requests for additional information on medicinal products that fall within the scope of early access programmes at Member State level that aim to provide patient access to medicinal products in situations of high unmet medical needs before a centralised marketing authorisation has been granted.
4. Where the Commission confirms the timely submission of the dossier pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article and that the dossier meets the requirements laid down in Article 9(2), (3) and (4), the Commission shall make the dossier available to the members of the Coordination Group in a timely manner via the IT platform referred to in Article 30 and inform the health technology developer thereof.
5. Where the Commission finds that the dossier fails to meet the requirements laid down in Article 9(2), (3) and (4), it shall request the missing information, data, analyses and other evidence from the health technology developer (second request). In such a case, the health technology developer shall submit the requested information, data, analyses and other evidence in accordance with the timeframe established pursuant to Article 15.
6. Where, after the second request referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article, the Commission deems that a dossier was not submitted in a timely manner by the health technology developer, or attests that it fails to meet the requirements laid down in Article 9(2), (3) and (4), the Coordination Group shall discontinue the joint clinical assessment. If the assessment is discontinued, the Commission shall make a statement on the IT platform referred to in Article 30, justifying the reasons for the discontinuation and shall inform the health technology developer accordingly. In the case of discontinuation of the joint clinical assessment, Article 13(1), point (d), shall not apply.
7. Where the joint clinical assessment has been discontinued and the Coordination Group, pursuant to Article 13(1), point (e), subsequently receives information, data, analyses and other evidence that formed part of the submission request referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the Coordination Group may re-initiate a joint clinical assessment in accordance with the procedure set out in this Section at the latest six months after the submission deadline referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, once the Commission has confirmed that requirements laid down in Article 9(2), (3) and (4) have been fulfilled.
8. Without prejudice to paragraph 7, where a joint clinical assessment has been re-initiated, the Commission may request the health technology developer to submit updates of previously provided information, data, analyses and other evidence.
Assessment process for joint clinical assessments
1. On the basis of the dossier submitted by the health technology developer and the assessment scope as set out pursuant to Article 8(6), the assessor, with the assistance of the co-assessor, shall prepare the draft joint clinical assessment and summary reports. The Coordination Group shall endorse the draft reports in accordance with the timeframe set out pursuant to Article 3(7), point (e). Those timeframes shall be:
(a)
for medicinal products, no later than 30 days following the adoption of a Commission decision granting a marketing authorisation;
(b)
for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, in accordance with the procedures for joint clinical assessments adopted pursuant to Article 3(7), point (e), and Article 15(1), point (b).
2. Where the assessor, with the assistance of the co-assessor, at any time during the preparation of the draft reports, considers that further specifications or clarifications or additional information, data, analyses or other evidence are necessary in order to carry out the assessment, the Commission shall request the health technology developer to provide such information, data, analyses or other evidence. The assessor and the co-assessor may also have recourse to databases and other sources of clinical information, such as patient registries, where it is deemed necessary. Where new clinical data becomes available during the assessment process, the health technology developer concerned shall proactively inform the Coordination Group.
3. The members of the designated subgroup shall provide their comments on the draft reports.
4. The subgroup shall ensure that patients, clinical experts and other relevant experts are involved in the assessment process by being given the opportunity to provide input on the draft reports. Such input shall be provided within the framework and the timeframe set out pursuant to Article 15(1), point (c), and Article 25(1), point (b), and the procedure adopted by the Coordination Group, and shall be made available in a timely manner to the Coordination Group via the IT platform referred to in Article 30.
5. The draft reports shall be provided to the health technology developer. The health technology developer shall signal any purely technical or factual inaccuracies in accordance with the timeframes established pursuant to Article 15. The health technology developer shall also signal any information it considers to be confidential and justify its commercially sensitive nature. The health technology developer shall not provide any comments on the results of the draft assessment.
6. Following receipt and consideration of comments provided in accordance with this Article, the assessor, with the assistance of the co-assessor, shall prepare revised draft reports, and submit those revised draft reports to the Coordination Group via the IT platform referred to in Article 30.
Finalisation of the joint clinical assessments
1. Upon receipt of the revised draft joint clinical assessment and summary reports, the Coordination Group shall review those reports.
2. The Coordination Group shall, within the timeframe set out pursuant to Article 3(7), point (e), and pursuant to Article 15(1), point (c), endeavour to endorse the revised draft reports by consensus. By way of derogation from Article 3(4), where a consensus cannot be reached, divergent scientific opinions, including the scientific grounds on which those opinions are based, shall be incorporated in the reports and the reports shall be deemed endorsed.
3. The Coordination Group shall submit the endorsed reports to the Commission for procedural review pursuant to Article 28, point (d). Where the Commission, within 10 working days of receipt of the endorsed reports, concludes that those reports do not comply with the procedural rules laid down pursuant to this Regulation or that they depart from the requirements adopted by the Coordination Group pursuant to this Regulation, it shall inform the Coordination Group of the reasons for its conclusion and request a review of the reports. The Coordination Group shall review the reports from a procedural point of view, take any necessary corrective actions, and re-endorse the reports in accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 2 of this Article.
4. The Commission shall publish, in a timely manner, the procedurally compliant reports endorsed or re-endorsed by the Coordination Group on the publicly accessible webpage of the IT platform referred to in Article 30(1), point (a), and shall inform the health technology developer of the publication.
5. If the Commission concludes that the re-endorsed reports still do not comply with the procedural rules referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, it shall, in a timely manner, make available those reports and its procedural review on the secure intranet of the IT platform referred to in Article 30(1), point (b), for the consideration of Member States and inform the health technology developer accordingly. The Coordination Group shall include summary reports of those reports as part of its annual report adopted pursuant to Article 6(4) and published on the IT platform as laid down in Article 30(3), point (g).
Member States’ rights and obligations
1. When carrying out a national HTA on a health technology for which joint clinical assessment reports have been published or in respect of which a joint clinical assessment has been initiated, Member States shall:
(a)
give due consideration to the published joint clinical assessment reports and all other information available on the IT platform referred to in Article 30, including the statement of discontinuation pursuant to Article 10(6), concerning that joint clinical assessment in their HTAs at Member State level; this shall not affect Member States’ competence to draw their conclusions on the overall clinical added value of a health technology in the context of their specific healthcare system and to consider the parts of those reports relevant in that context;
(b)
annex the dossier submitted by the health technology developer in accordance with Article 10(2) to the documentation of the HTA at Member State level;
(c)
annex the published joint clinical assessment report to the HTA report at Member State level;
(d)
not request at the national level information, data, analyses or other evidence that has been submitted by the health technology developer at Union level in accordance with Article 10(1) or (5);
(e)
immediately share through the IT platform referred to in Article 30 any information, data, analyses and other evidence with the Coordination Group that they receive from the health technology developer at Member State level and which form part of the submission request made pursuant to Article 10(1).
2. Member States shall provide the Coordination Group through the IT platform referred to in Article 30 with information on the national HTA in respect of a health technology which has been subject to a joint clinical assessment within 30 days from the date of its completion. In particular, Member States shall provide information on how joint clinical assessment reports have been considered when carrying out a national HTA. The Commission shall, based on information from Member States, summarise the uptake of the joint clinical assessment reports in HTAs at Member State level and publish a report on that overview on the IT platform referred to in Article 30 at the end of each year to facilitate the exchange of information between Member States.
Updates of joint clinical assessments
1. The Coordination Group shall carry out updates of joint clinical assessments where the initial joint clinical assessment report specified the need for an update when additional evidence for further assessment becomes available.
2. The Coordination Group may carry out updates of joint clinical assessments where requested by one or more of its members and new clinical evidence is available. When preparing the annual work programme the Coordination Group may review and decide on the need for updates of joint clinical assessments.
3. Updates shall be carried out in accordance with the same requirements set out pursuant to this Regulation for a joint clinical assessment and the procedural rules established pursuant to Article 15(1).
4. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States may carry out national updates of assessments on health technologies that have been subject to a joint clinical assessment. The members of the Coordination Group shall inform the Coordination Group before such updates are initiated. Where the need for the update concerns more than one Member State, the members concerned may request the Coordination Group to conduct a joint update pursuant to paragraph 2.
5. Once concluded, national updates shall be shared with the members of the Coordination Group via the IT platform referred to in Article 30.
Adoption of detailed procedural rules for joint clinical assessments
1. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, detailed procedural rules for:
(a)
cooperation, in particular by exchange of information, with the European Medicines Agency on the preparation and update of joint clinical assessments of medicinal products;
(b)
cooperation, in particular by exchange of information, with the notified bodies and expert panels on the preparation and update of joint clinical assessments of medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices;
(c)
interaction, including timing thereof, with and between the Coordination Group, its subgroups and the health technology developers, patients, clinical experts and other relevant experts during joint clinical assessments and updates.
2. Implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 33(2).
SECTION 2 — Joint scientific consultations
Principles of joint scientific consultations
1. The Coordination Group shall carry out joint scientific consultations in order to exchange information with health technology developers on their development plans for a given health technology. Those consultations shall facilitate the generation of evidence that meets the likely evidence requirements of a subsequent joint clinical assessment on that health technology. The joint scientific consultation shall include a meeting with the health technology developer and result in an outcome document that outlines the scientific recommendation made. Joint scientific consultations shall in particular concern all relevant clinical study design aspects, or clinical investigation design aspects, including comparators, interventions, health outcomes and patient populations. When carrying out joint scientific consultations on health technologies other than medicinal products, the specificities of those health technologies shall be taken into account.
2. A health technology shall be eligible for joint scientific consultations pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article where it is likely to be the subject of joint clinical assessment pursuant to Article 7(1) and where the clinical studies and clinical investigations are still in the planning stage.
3. The joint scientific consultation outcome document shall not give rise to any legal effects on Member States, the Coordination Group or the health technology developer. Joint scientific consultations shall not prejudice the joint clinical assessment which may be carried out on the same health technology.
4. Where a Member State carries out a national scientific consultation on a health technology that has been the subject of a joint scientific consultation, in order to complement it or to address context-specific issues related to national HTA system, the member of the Coordination Group concerned shall inform the Coordination Group thereof via the IT platform referred to in Article 30.
5. Joint scientific consultations on medicinal products may take place in parallel with the scientific advice from the European Medicines Agency pursuant to Article 57(1), point (n), of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Such parallel consultations shall involve the exchange of information and have synchronised timing, while preserving the separation of the respective remits of the Coordination Group and the European Medicines Agency. Joint scientific consultations on medical devices may take place in parallel with the consultation of the expert panels pursuant to Article 61(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/745.
Requests for joint scientific consultations
1. For health technologies referred to in Article 16(2), health technology developers may request a joint scientific consultation.
2. Health technology developers of medicinal products may request that the joint scientific consultation take place in parallel with the process of receiving scientific advice from the European Medicines Agency. In such a case, the health technology developer shall make the request for scientific advice to the European Medicines Agency when submitting the request for the joint scientific consultation. Health technology developers of medical devices may request that the joint scientific consultation take place in parallel with the consultation of an expert panel. In such a case, when submitting the request for the joint scientific consultation, the health technology developer may make the request for a consultation with the expert panel, where appropriate.
3. The Coordination Group shall publish the dates of request periods and state the planned number of joint scientific consultations for each of those request periods on the IT platform referred to in Article 30. At the end of each request period, where the number of eligible requests exceeds the number of planned joint scientific consultations, the Coordination Group shall select the health technologies that are to be subject to joint scientific consultations, ensuring the equal treatment of requests concerning health technologies with similar intended indications. The criteria for selecting from eligible requests for medicinal products and medical devices shall be:
(a)
unmet medical needs;
(b)
first in class;
(c)
potential impact on patients, public health, or healthcare systems;
(d)
significant cross-border dimension;
(e)
major Union-wide added value; or
(f)
Union clinical research priorities.
4. Within 15 working days after the end of each request period, the Coordination Group shall inform the requesting health technology developer whether it will engage in the joint scientific consultation. Where the Coordination Group refuses the request, it shall inform the health technology developer thereof and explain the reasons, having regard to the criteria laid down in paragraph 3.
Preparation of the joint scientific consultations outcome document
1. Following the acceptance of a request for a joint scientific consultation in accordance with Article 17, the Coordination Group shall initiate the joint scientific consultation by designating a subgroup for the joint scientific consultation. The joint scientific consultation shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements and procedures established pursuant to Article 3(7), point (f), and Articles 20 and 21.
2. The health technology developer shall submit up-to-date documentation containing the information necessary for the joint scientific consultation, in accordance with the requirements set out pursuant to Article 21, point (b), in the timeframe set out pursuant to Article 3(7), point (f).
3. The designated subgroup shall appoint from among its members an assessor and a co-assessor from different Member States to conduct the joint scientific consultation. The appointments shall take into account the scientific expertise necessary for the consultation.
4. The assessor, with the assistance of the co-assessor, shall prepare the draft joint scientific consultation outcome document in accordance with the requirements set out in this Article and in accordance with the guidance documents and procedural rules established pursuant to Article 3(7), points (d) and (f), and Article 20. For medicinal products, in accordance with international standards of evidence-based medicine, directly comparative clinical studies which are randomised, blinded and include a control group shall be advised whenever appropriate.
5. The members of the designated subgroup shall have the opportunity to provide their comments during the preparation of the draft joint scientific consultation outcome document. Members of the designated subgroup may, as appropriate, provide additional recommendations specific to their individual Member State.
6. The designated subgroup shall ensure that patients, clinical experts and other relevant experts are given an opportunity to provide input during the preparation of the draft joint scientific consultation outcome document.
7. The designated subgroup shall organise a face-to-face or virtual meeting for an exchange of views with the health technology developer and patients, clinical experts and other relevant experts.
8. Where the joint scientific consultation is carried out in parallel with the preparation of a scientific advice given by the European Medicines Agency or the consultation of an expert panel, representatives of the European Medicines Agency or of the expert panel, respectively, shall be invited to participate in the meeting, to facilitate coordination as appropriate.
9. Following receipt and consideration of any comments and input provided in accordance with this Article, the assessor, with the assistance of the co-assessor, shall finalise the draft joint scientific consultation outcome document.
10. The assessor, with the assistance of the co-assessor, shall take into account comments received during the preparation of the joint scientific consultation outcome document and submit its final draft, including any recommendations specific to individual Member States, to the Coordination Group.
Approval of joint scientific consultation outcome documents
1. The finalised draft joint scientific consultation outcome document shall be subject to the approval of the Coordination Group within the timeframe set out pursuant to Article 3(7), point (f).
2. The Commission shall send the joint scientific consultation outcome document to the requesting health technology developer at the latest 10 working days after it has been finalised.
3. The Coordination Group shall include anonymised, aggregated, non-confidential summary information on the joint scientific consultations, including on comments received during their preparation, in its annual reports and on the publicly accessible webpage of the IT platform referred to in Article 30(1), point (a).
Adoption of detailed procedural rules for joint scientific consultations
1. After consulting the Coordination Group, the Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, detailed procedural rules for:
(a)
submission of requests from health technology developers;
(b)
the selection and consultation of stakeholder organisations and patients, clinical experts and other relevant experts in joint scientific consultation;
(c)
cooperation, in particular by exchange of information, with the European Medicines Agency on joint scientific consultations on medicinal products where a health technology developer requests the consultation to be carried out in parallel with a process for scientific advice from the European Medicines Agency;
(d)
cooperation, in particular by exchange of information, with the expert panels on the joint scientific consultations on medical devices where a health technology developer requests the consultation to be carried out in parallel with the consultation of those expert panels.
2. Implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 33(2).
Format and templates of submission and outcome documents for joint scientific consultations
The Coordination Group shall establish in compliance with the procedural rules referred to in Article 20(1), point (a), the format and templates of:
(a)
requests from health technology developers for joint scientific consultations;
(b)
dossiers of information, data, analyses and other evidence to be submitted by health technology developers for joint scientific consultations;
(c)
joint scientific consultation outcome documents.
SECTION 3 — Emerging health technologies
Identification of emerging health technologies
1. The Coordination Group shall ensure the preparation of reports on emerging health technologies expected to have a major impact on patients, public health or healthcare systems. Those reports shall in particular address the estimated clinical impact and the potential organisational and financial consequences of emerging health technologies for national healthcare systems.
2. The preparation of the reports referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on existing scientific reports or initiatives on emerging health technologies and information from relevant sources including:
(a)
clinical study registers and scientific reports;
(b)
the European Medicines Agency in relation to upcoming submissions of applications for marketing authorisation for medicinal products referred to in Article 7(1);
(c)
the Medical Device Coordination Group;
(d)
health technology developers on the health technologies they are developing;
(e)
members of the stakeholder network referred to in Article 29.
3. The Coordination Group may consult stakeholder organisations which are not members of the stakeholder network referred to in Article 29 and other relevant experts, as appropriate.
SECTION 4 — Voluntary cooperation on health technology assessment
Voluntary cooperation
1. The Commission shall support the cooperation and the exchange of scientific information among Member States on:
(a)
non-clinical assessments on health technologies;
(b)
collaborative assessments on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices;
(c)
HTAs on health technologies other than medicinal products, medical devices or in vitro diagnostic medical devices;
(d)
the provision of additional evidence necessary to support HTAs, in particular in relation to health technologies for compassionate use and obsolete health technologies;
(e)
clinical assessments of health technologies referred to in Article 7 for which a joint clinical assessment is not yet initiated and of health technologies not referred to in that Article, in particular health technologies for which the report on emerging health technologies referred to in Article 22 has concluded that they are expected to have a major impact on patients, public health or healthcare systems.
2. The Coordination Group shall be used to facilitate the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1.
3. The cooperation referred to in paragraph 1, points (b) and (c), of this Article may be carried out using the procedural rules established in accordance with Article 3(7) and Articles 15 and 25 and using the format and templates established in accordance with Article 26.
4. The cooperation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be included in the annual work programmes of the Coordination Group and the results of the cooperation shall be included in its annual reports and on the IT platform referred to in Article 30.
5. Member States, through their designated member in the Coordination Group, may share national assessment reports on a health technology not referred to in Article 7, in particular on health technologies for which the report on emerging health technologies referred to in Article 22 has concluded that they are expected to have a major impact on patients, public health or healthcare systems, to the Coordination Group through the IT platform referred to in Article 30.
6. Member States may use methodological guidance developed pursuant to Article 3(7), point (d), for the purpose of national assessments.
Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
