My bookmarksSign up free

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2423 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (notified under document C(2022) 8716) (Only the Swedish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2423 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (notified under document C(2022) 8716) (Only the Swedish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

Decision (EU) 2022/2423 · Decision · 3 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

The performance targets, included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.

Supplementary provisions

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY Effectiveness of safety management Sweden Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation , ranging from EASA level A to D Air navigation service provider concerned Safety management objective 2022 2023 2024 LFV Safety policy and objectives C C C Safety risk management D D D Safety assurance C C C Safety promotion C C C Safety culture C C C KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory Sweden 2022 2023 2024 Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory 1,05  % 1,05  % 1,05  % KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight Sweden 2022 2023 2024 Targets in the key performance area of capacity , expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight 0,07 0,08 0,08 KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services En route charging zone of Sweden 2014 baseline value 2019 baseline value 2020 -2021 2022 2023 2024 Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) 604,02 SEK 537,87 SEK 1 361,88 SEK 774,65 SEK 650,98 SEK 587,62 SEK 62,70 EUR 55,84 EUR 141,38 EUR 80,42 EUR 67,58 EUR 61,00 EUR

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next