熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊
Evidence Act 1893

Evidence Act 1893 s 128

s 128 Professional communications

128.—(1) No advocate or solicitor is at any time permitted, unless with his or her client’s express consent, to disclose any communication made to him or her in the course and for the purpose of his or her employment as such advocate or solicitor by or on behalf of his or her client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he or she has become acquainted in the course and for the purpose of his or her professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him or her to his or her client in the course and for the purpose of such employment.(2) Nothing in this section protects from disclosure —(a) any such communication made in furtherance of any illegal purpose; (b) any fact observed by any advocate or solicitor in the course of his or her employment as such showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his or her employment. (3) It is immaterial whether the attention of such advocate or solicitor was or was not directed to such fact by or on behalf of his or her client. Explanation.—The obligation stated in this section continues after the employment has ceased. Illustrations (a) A, a client, says to B, a solicitor: “I have committed forgery and I wish you to defend me”. As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not a criminal purpose this communication is protected from disclosure. (b) A, a client, says to B, a solicitor: “I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of a forged deed on which I request you to sue”. This communication being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose is not protected from disclosure. (c) A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, a solicitor, to defend A. In the course of the proceedings B observes that an entry has been made in A’s account book, charging A with the sum said to have been embezzled, which entry was not in the book at the commencement of his or her employment. This being a fact observed by B in the course of his or her employment, showing that a fraud has been committed since the commencement of the proceedings, it is not protected from disclosure. —(1) No advocate or solicitor is at any time permitted, unless with his or her client’s express consent, to disclose any communication made to him or her in the course and for the purpose of his or her employment as such advocate or solicitor by or on behalf of his or her client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he or she has become acquainted in the course and for the purpose of his or her professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him or her to his or her client in the course and for the purpose of such employment. (2) Nothing in this section protects from disclosure —(a) any such communication made in furtherance of any illegal purpose; (b) any fact observed by any advocate or solicitor in the course of his or her employment as such showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his or her employment. (3) It is immaterial whether the attention of such advocate or solicitor was or was not directed to such fact by or on behalf of his or her client. Explanation.—The obligation stated in this section continues after the employment has ceased. Illustrations (a) A, a client, says to B, a solicitor: “I have committed forgery and I wish you to defend me”. As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not a criminal purpose this communication is protected from disclosure. (b) A, a client, says to B, a solicitor: “I wish to obtain possession of property by the use of a forged deed on which I request you to sue”. This communication being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose is not protected from disclosure. (c) A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, a solicitor, to defend A. In the course of the proceedings B observes that an entry has been made in A’s account book, charging A with the sum said to have been embezzled, which entry was not in the book at the commencement of his or her employment. This being a fact observed by B in the course of his or her employment, showing that a fraud has been committed since the commencement of the proceedings, it is not protected from disclosure.

Read this section in the full act → · Open its part →

Read the official text ↗

Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.