Evidence Act 1893 s 42

s 42 Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial

42. The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial is a relevant fact when the question is whether the court ought to take cognizance of the suit or to hold the trial.

Read this section in the full act → · Open PART 1 →

Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Read the official text ↗

Source: Singapore Statutes Online (Attorney-General's Chambers), © Government of Singapore.

The Singapore legislation on this platform is subject to copyright of the Singapore Government and is used/reproduced for the purposes of this platform with the permission of the Attorney-General's Chambers. Users of this platform may check Singapore Statutes Online for the latest version of the Singapore legislation.

What to look at next

Evidence Act 1893, full textChapter navigation and full text, so you can read this section in contextSingapore legislation Singapore Acts by type and yearGrouped by instrument type and year of enactment, so you can find others of the same kindBrowse by type and year PART 1 — RELEVANCY OF FACTS — read this in contextThe surrounding text of the act in order, so you can see what comes before and afterChapters and sections