My bookmarksSign up free

95/437/ECSC: Commission Decision of 1 February 1995 concerning a German proposal to grant State aid to Georgsmarienhütte GmbH (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

95/437/ECSC: Commission Decision of 1 February 1995 concerning a German proposal to grant State aid to Georgsmarienhütte GmbH (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

Decision · 4 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

1. The Commission has established that the investment costs for the electric arc furnace and the de-dusting installation, the construction works and the contribution to costs for the construction of the current-supply facility, amounting to DM 62,7 million, are not to be considered research and development (R & D) costs. 2. The Commission has established that State aid amounting to DM 20,675 million is not compatible with the common market for steel and prohibited by point (c) of Article 4 of the ECSC Treaty.

Article 2

1. The Commission has acknowledged a total of DM 60,972 million as being R & D costs within the meaning of Article 2 of Decision No 3855/91/ECSC of 27 November 1991 establishing Community rules for aid to the steel industry, and it considers that an aid intensity of 25 % gross is compatible with the common market for steel. 2. The Commission concludes that State aid amounting to DM 15,243 million is compatible with the common market for steel.

Article 3

Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of the notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany. Done at Brussels, 1 February 1995. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission (1) OJ No C 83, 11. 4. 1986, p. 2. (1) OJ No C 83, 11. 4. 1986, p. 5. (1) OJ No C 83, 11. 4. 1986, p. 5. (1) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1991, p. 57. (2) OJ No C 71, 9. 3. 1994, p. 5. (1) OJ No C 83, 11. 4. 1986, p. 2. (2) OJ No C 83, 11. 4. 1986, p. 5.

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next