Evidence Act 1950 s 167
s 167 No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence
The improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any decision in any case
if it appears to the court before which the objection is raised that, independently of the evidence objected to and admitted, there was sufficient evidence to justify the decision, or that, if the rejected evidence had been received, it ought not to have varied the decision.
__________________________________
LAWS OF MALAYSIA
Malay text (authoritative)
Tiada perbicaraan baharu bagi penerimaan atau penolakan keterangan dengan cara tidak wajar
Penerimaan atau penolakan keterangan dengan cara tidak wajar tidak dengan sendirinya menjadi alasan bagi perbicaraan baharu atau pengakasan mana-mana keputusan dalam mana-mana kes jika didapati oleh mahkamah yang di hadapannya bantahan itu dibuat bahawa tanpa bersandarkan keterangan yang dibantah dan diakui itu, ada keterangan yang cukup bagi mewajarkan keputusan itu, atau bahawa, jika keterangan yang ditolak itu telah diterima, ia tidak sepatutnya mengubah keputusan itu.
UNDANG-UNDANG MALAYSIA
Read this section in the full act → · Open Chapter XI →
Find Act 56 on lom.agc.gov.my ↗
Text as at 1 May 2017 (LOM reprint); amendments made after that date may not be incorporated.
Source: Laws of Malaysia, Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia (lom.agc.gov.my). Not a copy of the Gazette printed by the Government Printer (Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 61).
