Evidence Act 1950 s 44

s 44 Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment or incompetency of court may be proved

Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section 40, 41 or 42, and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a court not competent to deliver it or was obtained by fraud or collusion. Opinions of Third Persons when Relevant

Malay text (authoritative)

Fraud atau pakatan sulit dalam mendapatkan penghakiman atau ketidakwibawaan mahkamah boleh dibuktikan

Mana-mana pihak dalam sesuatu guaman atau prosiding lain boleh menunjukkan bahawa apa-apa penghakiman, perintah atau dekri yang berkaitan di bawah seksyen 40, 41 atau 42 dan yang telah dibuktikan oleh pihak menentang, telah diumumkan oleh mahkamah yang tidak berwibawa untuk mengumumkannya atau telah didapati dengan cara fraud atau pakatan sulit. Bila Pendapat Orang Ketiga Berkaitan

Read this section in the full act → · Open Chapter II →

Find Act 56 on lom.agc.gov.my ↗

Text as at 1 May 2017 (LOM reprint); amendments made after that date may not be incorporated.

Source: Laws of Malaysia, Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia (lom.agc.gov.my). Not a copy of the Gazette printed by the Government Printer (Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 61).

What to look at next

Evidence Act 1950, full textChapter navigation and full text, so you can read this section in contextMalaysia legislation Malaysia Acts by type and yearGrouped by instrument type and year of enactment, so you can find others of the same kindBrowse by type and year Chapter II — Relevancy of facts — read this in contextThe surrounding text of the act in order, so you can see what comes before and afterChapters and sections