Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing, Anti-Restricted Activity Financing and Proceeeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 s 64
Where a person is, by reason of section 63, treated as if he had been convicted of a serious offence, a court may make a forfeiture order under this Part if the court is satisfied— (a) on the evidence adduced before it that, on the balance of probabilities, the person has absconded; and (b) having regard to all the evidence before the court, that such evidence if unrebutted would warrant his conviction for the offence.
Perintah pelucuthakan jika seseorang melarikan diri
Jika seseorang, oleh sebab seksyen 63, dianggap seolah-olah dia telah disabitkan atas suatu kesalahan berat, mahkamah boleh membuat suatu perintah pelucuthakan di bawah Bahagian ini jika mahkamah itu berpuas hati— (a) berdasarkan keterangan yang dikemukakan di hadapannya bahawa, berdasarkan imbangan kebarangkalian, orang itu telah melarikan diri; dan (b) setelah mengambil kira segala keterangan di hadapan mahkamah itu, bahawa keterangan itu jika tidak disangkal akan menyebabkan dia disabitkan atas kesalahan itu.
Source: Laws of Malaysia, Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia (lom.agc.gov.my). Not a copy of the Gazette printed by the Government Printer (Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 61).