熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊

Crime and Courts Act 2013 Part 2 — Director General: designation under section 9

4–52 provisions

Advisory panel

4

(1) The Secretary of State must appoint an advisory panel (to enable recommendations to be made as to the operational powers which the Director General should have)— (a) whenever there is an appointment of a Director General; and (b) at any other time when the Secretary of State considers that it is appropriate to do so. (2) But that duty is subject to regulations under paragraph 5. (3) An advisory panel is to consist of— (a) a person to chair the panel, who must not be a civil servant; and (b) an appropriate number of other members (the “expert members”) who, when taken together, have appropriate knowledge of the following matters— (i) the training of constables in England and Wales police forces; (ii) the training of officers of Revenue and Customs and general customs officials to exercise powers in relation to customs matters; (iii) the training of immigration officers; (iv) the training of NCA officers. (4) The expert members of the advisory panel must— (a) consider the question of the adequacy of the Director General's training, and (b) give the panel's chair such information in respect of their consideration of that question as the chair may require. (5) The panel's chair must then— (a) consider the information given by the expert members, (b) decide the question of the adequacy of the Director General's training, and (c) produce a report containing recommendations as to the operational powers which the Director General should have. (6) The report must not recommend that the Director General should have a particular operational power unless the panel's chair has decided that the Director General has received adequate training in respect of that power. (7) That process for producing a report is to be conducted in accordance with the terms of appointment of the advisory panel (which may include terms about the particular operational powers in respect of which the question of the adequacy of the Director General's training is to be considered). (8) A reference in this paragraph to the question of the adequacy of the Director General's training is a reference to— (a) which operational powers the Director General has received adequate training in respect of, and (b) which operational powers the Director General has not received adequate training in respect of. (9) In this paragraph— “ adequate training ”, in relation to a particular operational power, means training that is adequate to enable that power to be properly exercised; “ appropriate ” means appropriate in the Secretary of State's view; “ report ” means a report for the purposes of section 9 containing recommendations as to the operational powers which the Director General should have.

No advisory panel

5

(1) The Secretary of State may, by regulations, make provision about the circumstances in which the Director General may be designated as a person having operational powers otherwise than on recommendations made in accordance with paragraph 4. (2) Regulations under this paragraph may, in particular, provide that the Secretary of State must designate the Director General as a person having particular operational powers if specified conditions are met. (3) Those conditions may, in particular, relate to training received by a person before appointment as the Director General. (4) In this paragraph “ specified ” means specified in regulations under this paragraph.

Back to Crime and Courts Act 2013 — full text

Provisions on this page are reproduced verbatim from official open data. See the attribution line.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (legislation.gov.uk).