s 267 Application to continue proceedings as derivative proceedings
(1) This section applies where— (a) a company has raised proceedings, and (b) the proceedings are in respect of an act or omission which could be the basis for derivative proceedings. (2) A member of the company may apply to the court to be substituted for the company in the proceedings, and for the proceedings to continue in consequence as derivative proceedings, on the ground that— (a) the manner in which the company commenced or continued the proceedings amounts to an abuse of the process of the court, (b) the company has failed to prosecute the proceedings diligently, and (c) it is appropriate for the member to be substituted for the company in the proceedings. (3) If it appears to the court that the application and the evidence produced by the applicant in support of it do not disclose a prima facie case for granting it, the court— (a) must refuse the application, and (b) may make any consequential order it considers appropriate. (4) If the application is not refused under subsection (3)— (a) the applicant must serve the application on the company, (b) the court— (i) may make an order requiring evidence to be produced by the company, and (ii) may adjourn the proceedings on the application to enable the evidence to be obtained, and (c) the company is entitled to take part in the further proceedings on the application. (5) On hearing the application, the court may— (a) grant the application on such terms as it thinks fit, (b) refuse the application, or (c) adjourn the proceedings on the application and make such order as to further procedure as it thinks fit.