熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊
Armed Forces Act 2006

Armed Forces Act 2006 s 160

s 160 Decisions of Court Martial: finding and sentence

(A1) The finding of the Court Martial on a charge must be determined by votes of the members of the Court Martial other than the judge advocate (the “lay members”) and— (a) where there are three lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than two of them agree; (b) where there are four lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than three of them agree; (c) where there are five lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than four of them agree; (d) where there are six lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than five of them agree. (1) Subject to subsection (4), any sentence passed by the Court Martial must be determined by a majority of the votes of the members of the court. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) In the case of an equality of votes on the sentence, the judge advocate has a casting vote.

Read this section in the full act → · Open its part →

Read the official text ↗

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.