熱門推薦罰單破解實戰交通警察名師 25 年經驗,親授警察臨檢、檢舉魔人、科技執法、車禍糾紛的執法邏輯看課程介紹
購物車我的課程我的書籤免費註冊
The Justification of Practices Involving Ionising Radiation Regulations 2004

The Justification of Practices Involving Ionising Radiation Regulations 2004 reg 21G

reg 21G Consent

(1) A person proposing to subject an individual to an exposure as part of an imaging practice must first provide a reasonable level of information about the proposed exposure to, and obtain prior consent for the exposure from, the individual to be exposed. (2) The requirement in paragraph (1) to obtain prior consent does not apply to law enforcement authorities. (3) In this regulation, “law enforcement authority” means any authority responsible for preventing, detecting, investigating, combating and punishing criminal offences, including, but not limited to, the police, any prosecutor, any judicial authority and any prison authority. (4) In paragraph (3), “prison authority” includes— (a) a governor of a prison; (b) an officer of a prison; (c) a person working at a prison who is authorised by the governor of the prison to exercise powers of search; (d) a director of a contracted out prison; (e) a prisoner custody officer of a contracted out prison; (f) a worker at a contracted out prison who is authorised by the director of the contracted out prison to carry out restricted activities. (5) Expressions used in paragraph (4)(d) to (f) have the meanings given in Part IV of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 .

Read this section in the full act → · Open its part →

Read the official text ↗

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.