Sch 10 para 5 Relationships between parties in the maintenance process
(1) Each railway undertaking or infrastructure manager must ensure that the freight wagons it operates, before their departure, have a certified entity in charge of maintenance and that the use of the wagon corresponds to the scope of the certificate. (2) All parties involved in the maintenance process must exchange relevant information about maintenance in accordance with the criteria listed in paragraphs 27 and 28. (3) Following contractual arrangements, a railway undertaking may request information for operational purposes on the maintenance of a freight wagon. The entity in charge of the maintenance of the freight wagon must respond to such requests either directly or through other contracting parties. (4) Following contractual arrangements, an entity in charge of maintenance may request information on the operation of a freight wagon. The railway undertaking or the infrastructure manager must respond to such requests either directly or through other contracting parties. (5) All contracting parties must exchange information on safety-related malfunctions, accidents, incidents, near-misses and other dangerous occurrences as well as on any possible restriction on the use of freight wagons. (6) The certificates of entities in charge of maintenance are to be accepted as proof of the ability of a railway undertaking or infrastructure manager to meet the requirements governing maintenance and the control of contractors and suppliers specified in Part 3, points in B.1, B.2, B.3 and C.1 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2010 of 9th December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining railway safety certificates as it has effect in Great Britain, and in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10th December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation as it has effect in Great Britain, unless the national safety authority can demonstrate the existence of a substantial safety risk. (7) If a contracting party, in particular a railway undertaking, has a justifiable reason to believe that a particular entity in charge of maintenance does not comply with the requirements of regulation 18A, or with paragraph 55B of the Schedule to the Channel Tunnel (Safety) (Amendment) Order 2013, or with the certification requirements of this Schedule, it must promptly inform the certification body thereof. The certification body must take appropriate action to check if the claim of non-compliance is justified and must inform the parties involved, including the competent national safety authority if relevant, of the results of its investigation. (8) When there is a change of entity in charge of maintenance, the registration holder must inform in due time the registration entity, as defined in the Interoperability Regulations, so that the latter may update the National Vehicle Register. (9) The former entity in charge of maintenance must deliver the maintenance documentation to either the registration holder or the new entity in charge of maintenance. (10) The former entity in charge of maintenance is relieved of its responsibilities when it is removed from the National Vehicle Register. If on the date of de-registration of the former entity in charge of maintenance any new entity has not acknowledged its acceptance of entity in charge of maintenance status, the registration of the vehicle is suspended.