Article 1
The aids for the private storage and maturing of armagnac and calvados, notified to the Commission by letter dated 29 September 1983, are incompatible with the common market and France may not implement them.
85/379/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1985 concerning an aid scheme for potable spirits producers in France (Only the French text is authentic)
85/379/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1985 concerning an aid scheme for potable spirits producers in France (Only the French text is authentic)
Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗
Article 2
France shall take the measures necessary to comply with this Decision within one month of its notification and shall inform the Commission thereof within the same period.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the French Republic. Done at Brussels, 22 May 1985. For the Commission Peter SUTHERLAND Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 54, 5.3.1979, p. 1.(2)OJ No L 89, 29.3.1985, p. 1.
Article 92
(1) of the EEC Treaty, which provides that such aids are incompatible with the common market. The exceptions to this principle do not apply in this case in view of the features of the plannried aids and the fact that they do not seek to satisfy the conditions for application of those exceptions.
Article 92
(3) of the EEC Treaty specifies which aids may be considered compatible with the common market. Such compatibility is determined in the light of objectives pursued in the interest of the Community and not in that of a single Member State. In order to safeguard the proper functioning of the common market, and having regard to the principle embodied in Article 3 (f) of the EEC Treaty, the exceptions to the incompatibility of aids provided for in Article 92 (3) of the EEC Treaty must be construed narrowly when any aid is scrutinized. In particular, they may be invoked only where the Commission is satifsfied that, without the aid, market forces alone would be insufficient to guide the recipients towards patterns of behaviour that would serve one of the said objectives. To apply the said exceptions in the case of aid that did not serve such an objective or where aid is not necessary for that purpose would be to place the industries or firms of certain Member States at an unfair advantage. Their financial position would be bolstered as a result, whereas trading conditions between Member States would be affected and competition distorted without any justification on grounds of the common interest within the meaning of Article 92 (3). The proposed assistance for the storage and maturing of armagnac and calvados spirits would relieve the recipients of certain costs inherent in those operations. In fact, the operations are intended to enable them to sell later a better quality product at a higher price. This means that the producer foregoes an immediate income and pays certains costs, which are covered, however, by a higher return at some point in the future. Both in France and in other Member States, however, spirits competing with armagnac and calvados undergo similar treatment without their producers qualifying for assistance to cover part of the cost. To agree to such aid being granted to armagnac and calvados producers alone would, under the circumstances, be tantamount to inflicting on their competitors a disadvantage which might be reflected in an unwarranted drop in their sales. The aid is operating aid involving no restructuring, redeployment or innovation. V In view of the above, the prohibition provided for in Article 92 (1) cannot be waived under paragraph 2 of that Article, given that the exceptions provided for in that paragraph are clearly not applicable in the present case. Nor do the aids for the private storage and maturing of armagnac and calvados satisfy the conditions for the application of one of the exceptions provided for in Article 92 (3) of the EEC Treaty. With regard to the exceptions contained in subparagraphs (a) and (c) of Article 92 (3) for aids to promote the development of certain areas, the Armagnac and Calvados areas are not ones where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment within the meaning of subparagraph (a). The operating aids planned by the French Government are not likely to contribute to the development of certain economic areas within the meaning of subparagraph (c). As regards the exceptions provided for in subparagraph (b) of Article 92 (3), it is obvious that the aids in question are not intended to support a project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the French economy. Lastly, as to the exception in subparagraph (c) of Article 92 (3) regarding aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities, the aids in question, being intended to cover certain operating costs, cannot have a development effect within the meaning of that exception. Moreover, the fact that a substantial proportion of the products which are to qualify for assistance is exported to other Member States makes it impossible to take the view that trading conditions would not be affected to an extent contrary to the common interest. Consequently, the planned aids do not satisfy the conditions necessary for application of one of the exceptions in Article 92 (3) of the EEC Treaty, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Other acts of the same type
2013/278/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/023 IT/Antonio Merloni SpA from Italy)Decision No 529/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on accounting rules on greenhouse gas emissions and removals resulting from activities relating to land use, land-use change and forestry and on information concerning actions relating to those activities2013/224/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 17 May 2013 authorising a laboratory in Croatia to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines (notified under document C(2013) 2783) Text with EEA relevance2013/225/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 17 May 2013 amending Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU concerning a financial contribution by the Union to certain Member States to support voluntary surveillance studies on honeybee colony losses, as regards extending the deadline for those Member States’ programmes on those studies (notified under document C(2013) 2785)2013/286/EU: Council Decision of 17 May 2013 designating the European Capital of Culture for the year 2017 in Denmark and in Cyprus and the European Capital of Culture for the year 2018 in MaltaCouncil Implementing Decision 2013/219/CFSP of 16 May 2013 implementing Decision 2011/486/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan2013/221/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 16 May 2013 establishing the financial contribution by the Union to the expenditure incurred in the context of the emergency vaccination plans against bluetongue in Belgium in 2007 and 2008 (notified under document C(2013) 2799)2013/222/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 16 May 2013 establishing the financial contribution by the Union to the expenditure incurred in the context of the emergency measures taken to combat avian influenza in Spain in 2009 (notified under document C(2013) 2779)2014/297/EU: Commission Decision of 15 May 2013 on State aid SA.33728(12/C) which Denmark is planning to implement for the financing of a new multiarena in Copenhagen (notified under document C(2013) 2740) Text with EEA relevance2013/237/EU: Council Implementing Decision of 14 May 2013 authorising the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland to apply special measures derogating from Article 5 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax2013/263/EU: Council Decision of 13 May 2013 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Russian Federation on drug precursors2013/267/EU: Council Decision of 13 May 2013 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 65th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee as regards amendments to the Condition Assessment Scheme and at the 92nd session of the Maritime Safety Committee as regards amendments to the International Safety Management Code as well as amendments to Chapter III of the SOLAS Convention and to the High Speed Craft Codes 1994 and 2000 concerning enclosed space entry and rescue drills
Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
What to look at next
Browse all EU Legal ActsEvery instrument by type and year, full text free to read section by sectionEuropean Union legislationEU Legal Acts by type and yearGrouped by instrument type and year of enactment, so you can find others of the same kindBrowse by type and yearEuropean Union: what this database coversWhich datasets are here, which official source they come from, and how current they areEuropean Union overview