94/19/EC: Commission Decision of 21 December 1993 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 86 of the EC Treaty (IV/34.689 - Sea Containers v. Stena Sealink - Interim measures) (Only the English text is authentic)

• Articles: 2

Article 1

The application made by Sea Containers Ltd requesting the Commission to order interim measures against Stena Sealink Line and Stena Sealink Ports is rejected.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to:

Sea Containers Limited,

Sea Containers House,

20 Upper Ground,

London SE1 9PF,

United Kingdom.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 1993.

For the Commission

Karel VAN MIERT

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No 13, 21. 2. 1962, p. 204/62.

(2) OJ No 127, 20. 8. 1963, p. 2268/63.

(3) (1980) ECR 119, p. 131 (paragraph 18).

(4) Case 85/76, Hoffmann La Roche v. Commission (1979) ECR 461, p. 541 (paragraph 91). See also the orders of the President of the Court of First Instance in Cases T-24/92 R and T-28/92 R, Langnese-Iglo and Schoeller v. Commission (1992) ECR, pp. II-1839 and T-7/93 R and T-9/93 R (same parties), (1993) ECR, pp. II-131.

(5) See recital 55 above.

(6) See among others the judgments of the Court in: Cases 6 and 7/73, Commercial Solvents v. Commission, (1974) ECR, p. 223; Case 311/84, Télémarketing, (1985) ECR, p. 3261; Case C-18/88 RTT v. GB-Inno, (1991) ECR, pp. I-5941; Case C-260/89, Elliniki Radiophonia Teleorassi, (1991) ECR, pp. I-2925; Cases T-69, T-70 and T-76/89, RTE, BBC and ITP v. Commission, (1991) ECR, pp. II-485, 535, 575, and Commision Decisions: 76/185/EEC - National Carbonizing Company, OJ No L 35, 10. 2. 1976, p. 6; 88/589/EEC - London European - Sabena, OJ No L 317, 24. 11. 1988, p. 47; 92/213/EEC - British Midland v. Aer Lingus, OJ No L 96, 10. 4. 1992, p. 34; B& I v. Sealink, 11. 6. (1992) 5 CMLR 255; EC Bulletin, No 6 - 1992, point 1.3.30.

(7) See footnote 1, on page 16.