This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.
Done at Brussels, 11 December 2002.
For the Commission
Loyola de Palacio
Vice-President of the Commission
(1) OJ C 98, 23.04.2002, p. 8.
(2) OJ L 273, 25.10.1994, p. 22.
(3) OJ L 128, 21.05.1999, p. 1.
(4) OJ C 176, 19.6.1996, p. 5.
(5) This plan was submitted to the Commission with letters dated 3 and 6 July 1998.
(6) OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.
(7) See in particular case C-480/98, points 20-21, European Court Reports 2000, Page I-8717.
(8) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.
(9) It concerns debts, which have to be paid to suppliers and other third parties (airport charges, social security etc.).
(10) It concerns financial debts (banks) or possibly debts related to the financing of the fleet.
(11) See paragraph 75 and followings.
(12) And also before exceptional items.
(13) See paragraph 78: net result could amount par management estimations to + EUR 18 million and following Deloitte analysis to losses from - EUR 3 million to - EUR 50 million. Possible additional exceptional income of EUR 112 million and charge of EUR 23 million could also arise.
(14) Caption Liabilities C 2 of OA's balance sheet.
(15) Captions B: Provisions for liabilities and charges + C: Creditors + D: Accruals and deferred income on Caption A: Net Equity in the liabilities of OA's balance sheet.
(16) As calculated in the preceding footnote: EUR 575 million at the end of 2000, EUR 825 million at the end of 2001.
(17) Pages 55 and 56 of the draft report of 3 July 1998 and page 74 of the report of 21 July 1999.
(18) Appendix 2 of the Greek memorandum forwarded on 11 April 2002.
(19) OJ L 193, 18.7.1983, p. 1.
(20) OJ L 283, 27.10.2001, p. 28.
(21) Greek Law 2238/1994, in particular Article 95 and encyclia of IKA No 42/1999 for the settlement of obligations.
(22) In the Annex 15.
(23) In Annexes 41-44.
(24) OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8.
(25) Indeed, seven major actions were described under the heading - reorganisation of the cost structure of the company - in the 1998 decision.
(26) OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2.
(27) Paragraph (5)(a) of section 2.1 specifies that a firm is in difficulty in the case of a limited company, where more than half of its registered capital has disappeared and more than one quarter of that capital has been lost over the preceding 12 months.
(28) Article 1 commitment (c).
(29) Article 1 commitment (b).
(30) The so-called Stardust Marine case. See in particular paragraph 55.
(31) Greek development Law 1846/1951, Article 11.
(32) Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior de Espana V. Ayuntamiento de Valencia (1994) ECR 1-877, paragraph 13.
(33) Case C-256/97 D.M. Transports.
(34) It must be reminded that for the social security the period covers eight years.
(35) According to Law 2676/1999 IKA has the right (not the obligation) to reach a settlement agreement for late payments or debts.
(36) Case C-256/97 D.M. Transports, point 24.
(37) Opinion of the Advocate-general Mischo, Case C-480/98, Magefesa, points 32 to 43, Rep I-8717.
(38) OJ C 350, 10.12.1994, p. 5.
(39) See inter-alia Case C 68/99 Italy, Mesures urgentes pour l'administration extraordinaire des grandes entreprises en dificulté, approved on 16 May 2000, points 70 to 73; Case C 57/97 Spain, Spanish corporate tax laws, approved on 31 October 2000, points 24 to 28; Case C 61/2000 France, Provisions pour les implantations d'entreprises à l'étranger en franchise d'impôt, approved on 21 November 2001, points 32 and 33.