By way of derogation from Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, where the differentiation of the refund is the result solely of a refund not having been fixed for Switzerland or Liechtenstein proof that the customs import formalities have been completed shall not be a condition for payment of the refund in respect of the goods covered by Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, which are listed in Tables I and II to Protocol 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 ( 6 ) .
資料由法律人 LawPlayer整理提供·EU law / curated by LawPlayer from EUR-Lex
Commission Regulation (EC) No 284/2005 of 18 February 2005 laying down derogations from Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 as regards products in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty exported to third countries other than Switzerland and Liechtenstein
The fact that no export refund has been fixed in respect of the export to Switzerland or Liechtenstein of the goods covered by Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, which are listed in Tables I and II to Protocol 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 shall not be taken into account in determining the lowest rate of refund within the meaning of Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
It shall apply from 1 February 2005.
Cite this act
Commission Regulation (EC) No 284/2005 of 18 February 2005 laying down derogations from Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 as regards products in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty exported to third countries other than Switzerland and Liechtenstein (EUR-Lex). Retrieved via LawPlayer, https://lawplayer.com/eu/act/32005R0284
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU, provided the source is acknowledged.
本頁資料來源:EUR-Lex·整理提供:法律人 LawPlayer· lawplayer.com