My bookmarksSign up free

2006/784/EC: Commission Decision of 14 November 2006 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in France (notified under document number C(2006) 5400) (Text with EEA relevance)

2006/784/EC: Commission Decision of 14 November 2006 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in France (notified under document number C(2006) 5400) (Text with EEA relevance)

Decision Β· 6 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 Β· Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. Β· Read the official text β†—

Article 1

The use of the following methods is hereby authorised for grading pig carcases pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 in France: (a) the Capteur Gras/Maigre β€” Sydel (CGM) apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex; (b) the CSB Ultra-Meater apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex; (c) the manual method (ZP) and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 3 of the Annex. The manual method (ZP) may be applied only in slaughterhouses which do not exceed a weekly slaughtering of 200 pigs.

Article 2

Notwithstanding the standard presentation referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84, pig carcases may be presented with the tongue attached during weighing and grading. In this case, in order to establish quotations for pig carcases on a comparable basis, the recorded hot weight shall be reduced by 0,5Β %.

Article 3

Modifications of the apparata or the assessment methods shall not be authorised.

Article 4

Decision 97/28/EC is hereby repealed. However, up to 17 December 2006, France may continue to apply the methods for grading pig carcases authorised under Decision 97/28/EC in place of the methods laid down by this Decision.

Article 5

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Supplementary provisions

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

ANNEX METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASES IN FRANCE PART 1 Capteur Gras/Maigre β€” Sydel (CGM) 1. Grading of pig carcases is carried out by means of the apparatus known as β€˜Capteur Gras/Maigre β€” Sydel (CGM version 01-A)’. 2. The apparatus shall be equipped with a high-definition Sydel probe 8 mm in diameter, a light-emitting infra-red diode (Honeywell) and two light sensors (Honeywell). The operating distance shall be between 0 and 95 mm. The results of the measurements shall be converted into estimated lean meat content by the CGM itself. 3. The lean meat content of carcases shall be calculated using the following formula: = 63,20 – 0,334 G1 – 0,427 G2 + 0,144 M2 where: = the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcase, G1 = the thickness of the fat (including rind), between the third and fourth last lumbar vertebrae, at 8 cm off the dorsal midline, at a trajectory perpendicular to the rind (in millimetres), G2 = the thickness of the fat (including rind), between the third and fourth last ribs, at 6 cm off the dorsal midline, at a trajectory perpendicular to this line (in millimetres), M2 = the thickness of the muscle, between the third and fourth last ribs, at 6 cm off the dorsal midline, at a trajectory perpendicular to this line (in millimetres). This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 45 and 125 kg. PART 2 CSB Ultra-Meater 1. Grading of pig carcases shall be carried out by means of the apparatus termed β€˜CSB Ultra-Meater version 3.0’. 2. The apparatus shall be equipped with a 3,5 MHz probe (Pie Medical). The operating distance shall be between 0 and 200Β mm. The results of the measurements shall be converted into estimated lean meat content using a computer. 3. The lean meat content of carcases shall be calculated using the following formula: = 62,68 – 0,921 G + 0,204 M where: = the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcase, G = the thickness of the fat (including rind), between the second and third last lumbar ribs, at 6 cm off the dorsal midline, at a trajectory perpendicular to the rind (in millimetres), M = the thickness of the muscle, between the second and third last lumbar ribs, at 6 cm off the dorsal midline, at a trajectory perpendicular to the rind (in millimetres). This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 45 and 125 kg. PART 3 Manual method (ZP) 1. Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by use of the manual method (ZP). 2. This method may be implemented using a ruler, with the gradings determined on the basis of the prediction equation. It is based on the manual measurement on the midline of the split carcase of the thickness of the fat and of the thickness of the muscle. 3. The lean meat content of carcases shall be calculated according to the following formula: = 55,99 – 0,514 Gf + 0,157 Mf where: = the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcase, Gf = the thickness of visible fat on the midline of the split carcase in millimetres, covering the glutaeus medius muscle (in millimetres), Mf = the visible thickness of the lumbar muscle on the midline of the split carcase, measured as the shortest connection between the front (cranial) end of the glutaeus medius muscle and the upper (dorsal) edge of the vertebral canal (in millimetres). This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 45 and 125 kg.

Other acts of the same type
Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2019/285 of 18 February 2019 implementing Decision 2011/486/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in AfghanistanCouncil Decision (EU) 2019/304 of 18 February 2019 concerning the notification by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish no longer to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which are contained in Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004 on the creation of an immigration liaison officers networkCouncil Decision (EU) 2019/305 of 18 February 2019 authorising Austria, Cyprus, Croatia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania and the United Kingdom to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of the Dominican Republic to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child AbductionCouncil Decision (EU) 2019/306 of 18 February 2019 authorising Austria to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Ecuador and Ukraine to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child AbductionCouncil Decision (EU) 2019/307 of 18 February 2019 authorising Austria and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Honduras to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child AbductionCouncil Decision (EU) 2019/308 of 18 February 2019 authorising Austria, Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Belarus and Uzbekistan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child AbductionCouncil Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/310 of 18 February 2019 authorising Poland to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 226 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added taxCouncil Decision (CFSP) 2019/1328 of 18 February 2019 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan establishing a framework for the participation of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in European Union crisis management operationsCommission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/708 of 15 February 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the determination of sectors and subsectors deemed at risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021 to 2030 (Text with EEA relevance.)Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/266 of 14 February 2019 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of solar glass originating in MalaysiaCommission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/265 of 12 February 2019 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (notified under document C(2019) 869)Council Decision (EU) 2019/267 of 12 February 2019 on the conclusion of the Status Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Albania on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Albania

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), Β© European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

What to look at next