My bookmarksSign up free
Source

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1791 of 16 November 2020 authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion

Council Decision (EU) 2020/1791 of 16 November 2020 authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion

Decision (EU) 2020/1791 · Decision · 7 articles

Data as of 2026-07-04 · Compiled from an official source version. Later amendments or repeals may not be reflected; the official text prevails. · Read the official text ↗

Article 1

Open ↗

By derogation from Article 110 TFEU, France is authorised to extend the application on the French mainland, to ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion, of a rate of excise duty lower than the full rate on alcohol set in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 92/84/EEC and of a rate of the levy called ‘ cotisation sur les boissons alcooliques ’ (VSS) lower than the full rate applicable according to the national legislation.

Article 2

Open ↗

The derogation set out in Article 1 of this Decision shall apply to rum as defined in point 1(f) of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council  ( 4 ) until 24 May 2021 and to rum as defined in point 1(g)(i) of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council  ( 5 ) as of 25 May 2021, produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion from sugarcane harvested at the place of manufacture, having a content of volatile substances other than ethyl and methyl alcohol equal to or exceeding 225 grams per hectolitre of pure alcohol and an alcoholic strength by volume of 40 % or more.

Article 3

Open ↗

1.   The reduced rates of excise duty and of VSS referred to in Article 1 and applicable to the rum referred to in Article 2 shall be confined to an annual quota of 153 000 hectolitres of pure alcohol. 2.   The reduced rates of excise duty and of VSS referred to in Article 1 of this Decision may each be lower than the minimum rate of excise duty on alcohol set by Directive 92/84/EEC, but shall not be more than 50 % lower than the full rate on alcohol set in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 92/84/EEC or the full rate on alcohol for the VSS. 3.   The cumulative fiscal advantage authorised in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article shall not be more than 50 % of the full rate on alcohol set in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 92/84/EEC.

Article 4

Open ↗

By 30 September 2025 at the latest, France shall submit a monitoring report to the Commission to enable it to assess whether the conditions justifying the authorisation set out in Article 1 continue to be fulfilled. The monitoring report shall contain the information set out in the Annex.

Article 5

Open ↗

This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2021 until 31 December 2027.

Supplementary provisions

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MONITORING REPORT REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 4

ANNEXSupplementary provisions

Open ↗

ANNEX INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MONITORING REPORT REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 4 1.    Estimated additional costs. Information shall be provided for each type of rum (‘agricole rum’ and ‘sucrerie rum’) benefiting from the reduced rate of the relevant indirect taxes. The French authorities shall complete Table 1 with at least the following information, where such information is available. The information provided in Table 1 shall be sufficient to evaluate the additional cost faced by the producers in the French outermost regions. Table 1   Guadeloupe (EUR) French Guiana (EUR) Martinique (EUR) Réunion (EUR) Notes (3) Sugarcane price (per 100 kg)           Molasses price (per 100 kg)           Freight cost (per kg)           Workforce (per hlpa (1) )           Other inputs (per hlpa (1) )           Depreciation costs           Compliance costs           Other costs (2)           Notes to Table 1: ( 1 ) Hectolitres of pure alcohol. ( 2 ) Provide information on water, energy and waste-related costs, other relevant costs. ( 3 ) Provide information on all the specifications and clarifications underpinning the calculation methods. 2.    Other subsidies. The French authorities shall complete Table 2, listing all other aid and support measures addressing the additional operating costs of economic operators linked to the outermost region status. Table 2 Aid/support measure (1) Period (2) Target sector (3) Budget amount in EUR (4) Annual expenditure, in EUR (2019-2024) (5) Share of the budget attributable to additional costs compensation (6) Estimated number of beneficiary firms (7) Notes (8) [list]                               Notes to Table 2: ( 1 ) Provide information on the identification and the type of measure (programme, State aid number etc.). ( 2 ) Provide information on years covered by the measure. ( 3 ) Provide information only for sector-oriented measures. ( 4 ) Provide information on the overall budget of the measure and the sources of funding. ( 5 ) Provide information on actual expenditure year by year in the monitoring period (2019-2024), where available. ( 6 ) Provide approximate estimation, as a percentage of the overall budget. ( 7 ) Provide approximate estimation, where feasible. ( 8 ) Provide any comments and clarifications. 3.    Impact on public budget. The French authorities shall complete Table 3 providing the estimated total amount (in EUR) of tax not collected because of the tax differentials applied. Table 3   2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Foregone tax revenue             4.    Impact on overall economic performance. The French authorities shall complete Table 4 providing any data demonstrating the impact of the reduced rate of the relevant indirect taxes on the socioeconomic development of the French outermost regions. The indicators required in Table 4 refer to the performance of the rum sector compared to the general performance in the regional economy. If some of the indicators are not available, alternative reporting data shall be included on the overall socioeconomic performance of the French outermost regions. Table 4 Year (1) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Notes (2) Regional gross value added               In the rum sector               In the cane-sugar-rum sector               Employment in local distilleries               Employment in the cane-sugar-rum sector               Unemployment rate               Number of active enterprises               Number of rum producers (including SMEs)               Sugarcane cultivation area (ha)               Price level index – French mainland               Price level index – regions               Number of tourists – regions               Number of tourists – distilleries               Notes to Table 4: ( 1 ) The information might not be available for all the years listed. ( 2 ) Provide comments and clarifications as deemed relevant. 5.    Specifications of the regime. The French authorities shall complete Table 5 for each type of rum (‘agricole rum’ and ‘sucrerie rum’) and by region (Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion). If some of the indicators are not available, alternative reporting data shall be included on the specifications of the regime. Table 5 Quantity (in hlpa (1) ) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Rum production             Traditional rum production             Local sales of rum             Rum dispatched to the French mainland             Traditional rum dispatched to the French mainland             Traditional rum dispatched under the derogation             Rum dispatched to other Member States             Rum exported to third countries             Rum as a percentage of total extra OR-exports (%)             Share of French traditional rum in the French mainland rum market (%)             Rum market growth rate in the French mainland (%)             Spirits market growth rate in the French mainland (%)             Note to Table 5: ( 1 ) Hectolitres of pure alcohol. 6.    Irregularities. The French authorities shall provide information on any investigations on administrative irregularities, on evasion of the relevant indirect taxes, and on smuggling of the alcoholic products concerned in the context of the application of the authorisation. They shall provide detailed information, including at least information on the nature of the case, value and time period.   7.    Complaints. The French authorities shall provide information on whether the local, regional, or national authorities have received any complaints concerning the application of the authorisation, either by beneficiaries or by non-beneficiaries.

Other acts of the same type
Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1102 of 20 June 2017 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/1103 of 20 June 2017 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African RepublicCommission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1104 of 20 June 2017 determining that a temporary suspension of the preferential customs duty pursuant to Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 20/2013 is not appropriate for imports of bananas originating in NicaraguaCouncil Decision (EU, Euratom) 2017/1108 of 20 June 2017 appointing two members of the committee of independent eminent persons pursuant to Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundationsCouncil Decision (EU) 2017/1163 of 20 June 2017 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European UnionCommission Implementing Decision of 19 June 2017 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a request for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Dealurile Crişanei (PGI))Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1087 of 19 June 2017 amending Decision 2014/386/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and SevastopolCouncil Decision (EU) 2017/1101 of 19 June 2017 appointing a chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property OfficeCouncil Decision (EU) 2017/1138 of 19 June 2017 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Minamata Convention on Mercury as regards the adoption of the required content of the certification referred to in Article 3(12) of the Convention and of the guidance referred to in Article 8(8) and (9) of the ConventionCommission Implementing Decision of 16 June 2017 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a request for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Dealurile Zarandului (PGI))Council Decision (EU) 2017/1191 of 16 June 2017 abrogating Decision 2014/56/EU on the existence of an excessive deficit in CroatiaCouncil Decision (EU) 2017/1225 of 16 June 2017 abrogating Decision 2010/288/EU on the existence of an excessive deficit in Portugal

Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the EU), © European Union, reuse permitted under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Contents

What to look at next